Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

College Girls: Unpaid Whores
cornellreview ^ | 3/4/2002 | Joseph J. Sabia

Posted on 03/19/2002 7:13:02 AM PST by TLBSHOW

College Girls: Unpaid Whores

If you were to visit a women’s studies department at an elite university, you would encounter a wide variety of courses on the sexual liberation of women. The main thrust of these courses is that for too long, various social institutions have prevented women from exploring their sexual desires. Now, thanks to the heroism of such women as Gloria Steinem, Margaret Sanger, and Bella Abzug, women have been partially freed from the oppressive forces of male patriarchy. In other words, young women are encouraged to be whores.

The chant of Gen. Y college babes might as well be “We’re here, we’re whores, get used to it!” No, most girls are not actually uttering those words, but the slutty sentiments are implicit in the standard female college behavior – wearing tight shirts and pants, getting publicly drunk, hanging on every guy around, and engaging in random sex.

The concept of “behaving like a lady” is an anachronism. If a college girl acts like a lady, she is considered boring, prudish, and old-fashioned. Why is this happening? Five important explanations come to mind.

(1) Feminist thought has taught young women that equality is achieved by acting like promiscuous sluts.

In Who Stole Feminism? Christina Hoff Summers writes extensively about how the women’s rights movement was hijacked by gender feminists, who supplanted equity feminists. While equity feminists were concerned with such mainstream issues as equal pay for equal work, gender feminists were obsessed with proving that (a) there are no biological differences between men and women and (b) men are evil. When the gender feminists seized control of the movement, they encouraged women to behave just as immorally as many men. This was seen as a step toward gender equity.

But why is it liberating for a college-age woman to jump into bed with a man that is not her husband? Why is it freeing to become intoxicated and to hook-up with anonymous frat guys? Why is it an expression of equal rights to give into men’s animalistic instincts?

Presumably, women could exercise their true power to tame men by using celibacy (and other ladylike behavior) to induce men into monogamous stable relationships and eventually into marriage. Along the way to healthy relationships, women could also gain some self-respect.

(2) Young women have turned away from God.

As women have strayed from the church, they have replaced what is holy with what is temporally pleasing. For Catholics, the model woman is Mary, the virgin Mother of God. She is beloved by the faithful for her unflappable devotion to and trust in God, her nurturing of the Son of Man, and her deep love for all humanity.

Today’s college girl looks to Ally McBeal, the trollops of Sex in the City, and the floozies on Friends to set their moral compasses.

The sad truth is that college girls are so desperate to find love that they are willing to degrade themselves to get it. But true love can only be understood in the context of the Word of God. Any other notion of “love” is secular and, by definition, limited and finite.

(3) The costs of sex have rapidly declined.

The explosion in availability of the birth control pill fueled the so-called sexual revolution of the ‘60s, the consequences of which we still see today. With the ability to partially regulate the probability of pregnancy, women can choose to have sex more liberally. Expanded abortion-on-demand services have also permitted young women to engage in more sex because of the greater ease with which a major consequence of sex can be disposed. Abortion providers have recognized the prevalence of sex by college girls in their choice to locate close to our nation’s colleges and universities.

Perhaps just as important as the reduction in the economic costs of sex is the decline in the psychic costs of sex – specifically, the social stigma associated with nonmarital sex. In an earlier era, young women who chose to engage in sex were socially ostracized and their behavior denounced. Today, if a young woman engages in a one-night-stand (“random hook-up”) she is a liberated studette.

(4) Marriage has been devalued by young women and replaced not only by cohabitation but also by new, bizarre social arrangements such as “friends with benefits.”

Young women have traditionally looked to men for marriage and family formation. This is no longer true. College girls look at men not as marriage material, but as sex partners and roommates. Many college women live and sleep with their boyfriends. This is the norm.

Additionally, other sex-based relationships have become commonplace. In recent years, a new and disturbing arrangement known as “friends with benefits” has emerged. In this arrangement, men are not even forced to perform the normal duties of boyfriends, i.e. flowers, Valentine’s Day cards, rides to the abortion clinic, etc. Instead, girls consider these guys “just friends” whom they happen to screw every now and again. No strings, no attachments, no dinners. Just sex when they feel like it.

This type of arrangement is the next logical step in the direction that young women have drifted in the last few decades. These women have become unpaid whores. At least prostitutes made a buck off of their trade. These women just give it away.

The truth is that women actually lose power by becoming tramps. When they give away one of their main sources of bargaining power in a relationship – sex – men gain total power by achieving everything they want…free sex with no obligation.

(5) “You know exactly who’s to blame…the mother and the father.” – The Oompa Loompas in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory

College girls are clearly responsible for their own behavior, but their parents have shaped their values. The verdict is in -- their parents have failed. Too many parents, particularly mothers, have eschewed their moral obligations to raise their daughters to be respectable ladies.

Instead, many moms want to be their daughters’ friends, talking late at night about boyfriends, parties, who’s hot, etc. Young women do not need more friends, they need mothers who will provide moral guidance. Unfortunately, these self-absorbed moms cannot deal with the fact that they are old and will never again see their early 20s. Thus, they attempt to live their sorority days all over again through their slutty daughters.

“Now Sabia,” you say, “you’ve been very hard on young women. But don’t young men deserve some blame? Aren’t you just a bitter, cranky, rapidly-aging misogynist?”

The answer to both questions is ‘yes.’

Young men are awful and they have gotten worse over the years. And let me be clear – young men are responsible for their own behavior.

But women have historically been the civilizing forces for men. That is biological. Moreover, several verses in the Scriptures refer to the important role that women have in the moral uplift of men.

It should surprise no one that sexual activity has historically been more frequent among gay men than among heterosexuals. This is because there is no civilizing female force in the gay community. Whenever men want to have sex, they just go ahead and do it. Neither of the partners has much of an incentive to refrain from sex since monogamous relationships and traditional familes are generally not the final goals of these partnerships. Recently, the behavior of young heterosexuals has begun to resemble that of gay men because young women are imitating men in their sexual promiscuity.

The result of young women’s abdication of responsibility has been significant moral decay on America’s college campuses. Can the moral high ground ever be reclaimed? Perhaps…one church pew at a time.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: academialist; collegegirls; feministwatch; sasu; spg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-544 next last
To: Tanngrisnir, DallasDeb
Welcome Mr or Miss Libertairna Newbie...we'll have great fun! I swear.

If you're a true Objectivist, at least we'll agree on guns....all is not lost on those of us in the VRWC.

Warm Welcome Regards

281 posted on 03/19/2002 10:38:30 AM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Can't have too many pictures of drunken college chicks!

Man! I wish I was in college again!

282 posted on 03/19/2002 10:39:51 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68

283 posted on 03/19/2002 10:42:44 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
In the early 70s when I was in High School most of the slutty girls had "daddy issues"....seriously. They looked for male approval thru sex.

Nothing has changed. If anything, "daddy issues" have gotten worse because too many dads are absent from their families--but that's a topic for another thread.

284 posted on 03/19/2002 10:43:05 AM PST by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

Comment #285 Removed by Moderator

To: wardaddy
Even if you take pregnancy out of the mix, the downside for women is much greater. One of the biggest dangers IMO is that a woman in her early 20's has a huge relative advantage over a guy in his early 20's because older guys are hitting on them too. But after 25, a woman's bargaining strength realative to men her age starts going downhill very quickly as those older guys are looking for the new flavor of the week. By 28, if she hasn't recognized this fact and married a good man or nurtured very good career for herself, then she is in serious trouble.

The problem is that people tend to stick with a "good" thing. A guy can afford to party well into his 30's, but a woman really can't. That is the problem with shows like "Sex in the City"; girls see this stuff and think they can have it all, and then at age 37 marry the guy of their dreams.

Eventually, the technology will be out there to keep women as young and fertile as a 20 y.o. well into their 40's. This will be a net plus for everyone, but until then, mothers need to teach their daughters to always take the long view.

286 posted on 03/19/2002 10:48:18 AM PST by Cu Roi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Mike K
Whenever the libs string that thought together with the thought that so many women think they are some kind of bi-sexual creatures, and/or lesbians, with pulsating toys that have reasonable facsimiles as standard packages on men, because men don't feel the need to make commitments to be with them anymore, and that's why they think they hate men, we'll be cookin' with gas. And old Rush was really right on the fact that feminism has been inordinately rough on women that are not easy to look at.
287 posted on 03/19/2002 10:59:07 AM PST by stickywillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stickywillie
What did Rush say, that feminism was created for the 'ugly girl' to have opportunities?
288 posted on 03/19/2002 11:00:45 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
More drunken college fun!

Of course, drunken college girl pics would be incomplete without our beloved First Daughter Jenna.


289 posted on 03/19/2002 11:01:49 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68
Upping the celebrity stakes I see!
290 posted on 03/19/2002 11:10:26 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Upping the celebrity stakes I see!

LOL! No, I just ran out of regular drunken college girl pictures that weren't all of the same people.

291 posted on 03/19/2002 11:13:27 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Forgive my lack of moral outrage, but is there a particular reason why I should give a crap whether "college girls" these days are giving it up faster than a Frenchman at a schnitzel stand? Now, I don't have a problem with people "judging" this type of thing, but how exactly is this any of my business?

Have you ever had the thrill of taking a girl to a party, knowing that she has soiled the sheets of fifteen percent of the men and five percent of the women there?

292 posted on 03/19/2002 11:14:05 AM PST by Diojneez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68

293 posted on 03/19/2002 11:16:05 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

Comment #294 Removed by Moderator

To: TLBSHOW
College Girls: Unpaid Whores

It sounds like somebody's not getting any.

295 posted on 03/19/2002 11:17:50 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cu Roi
I agree...Women do not have the same time to make concrete life choices as men. Early 30s at the latest...pregnancy after age 35 for a woman becomes roughly 4 fold more difficult than at say 20-25. My wife is 7 years younger than me and we are both living proof of a marriage where she is reaching the last decade of fertility and I'm....well I'm middle-aged. 36 and 44 repsectively.

The Femi-Nazis wish to ignore reality but wishing reality away and it going away are not the same thing.

Of course an attractive classy woman will always attract men even as she ages....it's just that if she's looking for security or children then the men will tend to be older.

I like women of all ages but from experience I've learned I prefer at my current age the fact that my wife is still youngish..yet grown up (more than me in some ways)..it's just a nice dividend...call me a pig!..LOL

My great grandfather outlived 3 wives and had 22 children...some well into his 70s....my hero.

Seriously at 44, this current little wonder in the oven will be the last planned.

296 posted on 03/19/2002 11:19:08 AM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Bump for reference.
297 posted on 03/19/2002 11:19:44 AM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserve-it
Responsibility for one's personal behavior has been neutralized

Huh? The article isn't an attack on the girls for not taking responsibility, or for hurting or damaging other people. It's an attack on them for choosing to act in a way the author doesn't like, choosing to act in a way that is harmless. How is a girl's sleeping around irresponsible?

298 posted on 03/19/2002 11:20:43 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Thorn11cav
You go T-Cav!!!!....I love the way you just cut right to the backstrap.
299 posted on 03/19/2002 11:22:00 AM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I think society is trained to see a young girl sleeping around for pleasure as 'irresponsbile' becuase on some level in our DNA we all know women are responible for furthering the species through reproduction.
300 posted on 03/19/2002 11:28:13 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-544 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson