To: conserve-it
Responsibility for one's personal behavior has been neutralizedHuh? The article isn't an attack on the girls for not taking responsibility, or for hurting or damaging other people. It's an attack on them for choosing to act in a way the author doesn't like, choosing to act in a way that is harmless. How is a girl's sleeping around irresponsible?
298 posted on
03/19/2002 11:20:43 AM PST by
xm177e2
To: xm177e2
I think society is trained to see a young girl sleeping around for pleasure as 'irresponsbile' becuase on some level in our DNA we all know women are responible for furthering the species through reproduction.
To: xm177e2
Geez i dunno .....I guess 80% illegitiamcy rate in the black community is harmeless...no I get it....they're all immaculately concieved.
Promiscuousness is not victimless. Birds and the Bees remember? STDs?
Sex without responsibility is a canard.
To: xm177e2
How is a girl's sleeping around irresponsible? Just ask yourself why this has not happened in any society in the past. The asnwer is not trivial, but you will start on the road to the answer.
Even among animals there are codes and restrictive rules on the behavior in this area of life. Just ask youself, why?
To: xm177e2
Huh? The article isn't an attack on the girls for not taking responsibility, or for hurting or damaging other people. It's an attack on them for choosing to act in a way the author doesn't like, choosing to act in a way that is harmless. How is a girl's sleeping around irresponsible?Oh, I dunno. Pregnancies and abortions, catching something and passing it on, reputation for going through men faster than a Mack truck through tissue paper...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson