Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents drug use, sex lives steal focus: (Van Dam's reveal intimate details, more questions arise!)
Court TV ^ | March 16, 2002 | Court TV

Posted on 03/16/2002 12:09:40 PM PST by FresnoDA

Parents drug use, sex lives steal focus

 
photo

Brenda van Dam cries as she testifies Thursday about her daughter's disappearance.

SAN DIEGO (Court TV) — The parents of Danielle van Dam took the stand Thursday at a preliminary hearing for their daughter's accused killer and tearfully recalled the circumstances of the 7-year-old's abduction from her bedroom.

Asked what she found when she went to wake her daughter on the morning of Feb. 2, a red-eyed Brenda van Dam replied, "an empty bed."

But the girl's disappearance and murder quickly took a back seat to questions about her parents' drug use, drinking habits and sex life.

Brenda and Damon van Dam acknowledged smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol the night their daughter vanished from her bedroom. A lawyer for murder suspect David Westerfield also repeatedly quizzed the pair about rumors they were "swingers," sexually involved with others.

 

Danielle's father, Damon van Dam

Judge H. Ronald Domnitz precluded many of the questions as irrelevant, but Brenda van Dam admitted a female friend tried to grope her breasts in a bar that night. And her husband said he had a relationship with the same woman and had kissed and massaged her in his bed the night his daughter went missing.

Westerfield, a 50-year-old engineer who lived two doors down from the van Dams, is accused of kidnapping the second-grader from her bedroom the night of Feb. 1 and killing her. Her body, too decomposed to determine a cause of death, was discovered in a trash-strewn lot Feb. 27. Spots of Danielle's blood were found in Westerfield's recreational vehicle and on his jacket, according to police. They said they also recovered child pornography from his home and suspect a sexual motive.

At the close of the three-day hearing Thursday afternoon, Domnitz ruled there was sufficient evidence to try Westerfield for kidnapping and murder. He will be arraigned March 28. Prosecutors have not decided whether they will seek the death penalty.

Brenda van Dam, who like her husband wore a picture of her daughter on her lapel, testified that almost all of her contact with Westerfield came in the week preceding her daughter's abduction. On Jan. 25, she said, she saw him at Dad's, a neighborhood bar where she had gone with two female friends. He bought her a cranberry and vodka cocktail, but she said she could not remember what they talked about and still did not know his name.

 

Suspect David Westerfield

Several days later, she said, she, her son Dylan and Danielle went to Westerfield's home while selling Girl Scout cookies. Westerfield formally introduced himself and bought four boxes of cookies. While the children ran around his pool, she and Westerfield talked, she testified.

He wanted to get to know her female friends, she said.

"He said to tell them I had a rich neighbor to introduce them to," she testified.

She said she told Westerfield that she and her friends might return to Dad's the next Friday if she could get a baby sitter. Her husband, she recalled telling him, would be out of town.

As she left his house, Westerfield took her phone number and told her he "had adult parties and also barbecues" and planned to invite her and her husband to them, she testified.

She said she found the comment so strange that she called her husband at work when she got home.

"It struck me as odd that he mentioned adult parties. I didn't know what he meant by that," she said. On cross-examination, she denied Feldman's charge that she was tickled because "there were others in your neighborhood allegedly engaged in the swinging lifestyle."

The van Dam's testified that on Feb. 1, Brenda and her two female friends planned to go to Dad's bar and Damon, his trip postponed, to stay home with the three children. Damon van Dam said he drank two beers with dinner and a third later.

When the friends, identified as Denise Kamal and Barbara Easton, arrived, the adults went into the garage, locked the door and shared half a marijuana joint. The boys played video games while Danielle sat at the kitchen table writing in her journal.

Brenda van Dam said she had smoked marijuana about 30 times before, and both testified they had the garage lock specially set to keep the children from happening upon them. Damon van Dam said he had one or two hits and Brenda said she had "three or four puffs."

"Did it get you high?" asked defense lawyer Steven Feldman.

"I did," she said.

The women left for the bar, and Damon van Dam said he played video games with his sons and then put all three children to bed at about 10 p.m. Danielle, he said, was already in her four-poster bed when he entered the room to tuck her in.

"I gave her a kiss goodnight," he said. He left her door and those of her brothers open about eight inches, he said.

After watching television and walking the dog, he went to bed, he said. He testified that the dog, Leila, was raised with dogs who had their larynx removed and almost never barked.

Brenda van Dam said that when she arrived at the bar, Westerfield was there with two friends and offered to buy her and her friends drinks.

"He said, Ladies don't buy their own drinks and threw some money on the counter," she testified.

She said that over the course of the evening, she had three cranberry and vodka cocktails and a shot of tequila. She said she did not know how many Westerfield bought because her friends just kept passing them to her. She also said she went to the parking lot with Easton, Kamal and two male friends and smoked the rest of the joint.

"How clearheaded were you," Dusek asked.

"I think I was very clearheaded," she said.

At one point, she and her friends played pool with Westerfield's friends. She said she noticed him watching them.

She said she danced with her male friends and a male stranger and then with Kamal and Easton. Under cross-examination, she admitted that Easton and Kamal were dancing provocatively with each other, and that she told investigators Easton tried to grab her breasts. Brenda van Dam denied ever dancing with Westerfield, but before the hearing ended, the defense listed several bystanders who said they had seen the pair on the dance floor together.

At 1:50 a.m., the bar closed and she drove Kamal and Easton back to her house. The two male friends also joined them.

Damon van Dam said he had just returned to bed from taking the dog out again when his wife and friends arrived home. Brenda van Dam said as she walked into the house, the security alarm indicated a door in the garage was ajar. The alarm was not hooked up to a security company and did not sound continuously when a door or window opened. She said she closed it and then she and Easton went to the master bedroom.

Easton, he said, got on the bed.

"I put my arm around her and kissed her and rubbed her back," said Damon van Dam, adding that he could not remember whether his wife was in the room at the time, but she later left.

On cross-examination, Feldman asked if he and Easton had a relationship with her and he said "Yes."

Eventually, he and Easton joined the two men and Brenda van Dam in the living room. After eating pizza, the guests left and the van Dams went to bed about 2:30 without looking in on their children.

Damon van Dam said that sometime during the night, he woke to use the restroom and noticed a flashing light on the alarm panel. He went downstairs and found the sliding back door slightly ajar. He closed it, thinking one of his guests had opened it, and returned to bed.

At 9 the next morning, Brenda found Danielle's bed empty.

"We started looking everywhere," she said.

"What was your state of mind?" Dusek asked.

"Frantic," she said.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandams; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-348 next last
To: Drango
Focus, I repeat FOCUS, on the murder of the child, not the sins of the parents...

I'll second that one. Really, none of this other matters at all: I really don't care. What I *do* care about is who murdered their little girl and that there be clear and convincing evidence as to who did it, so the bastard can be executed. *That* is what is important here, not the habits of the parents (unless said habits are relevant to the case).

Tuor

121 posted on 03/17/2002 2:07:05 AM PST by Tuor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Yes there are FR Swingers. We have been told that there are more here than we could possibly imagine.
122 posted on 03/17/2002 4:34:17 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
I would really like to know if the guy had pictures of prepubescent girls. (There's a difference between 17 and 7.)
123 posted on 03/17/2002 4:36:46 AM PST by TN Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
!!!

In that case, one almost hopes that the lads brought back some gifts of their own.

Ed

124 posted on 03/17/2002 4:57:22 AM PST by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: spectre
As she was signing off for the hour on Friday morning, the Court TV anchorwoman portrayed the VD's as having been cooperative and forthcoming with the facts since the beginning of the case. What an outrageous lie.
125 posted on 03/17/2002 5:16:11 AM PST by TN Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TN Republican
I saw and heard that too. It confirmed the bias of the majority at Court TV.

The other one who irritates me is the Male Reporter, who does his live reports outside the courtroom. Another example of outrageous biased reporting.

sw

126 posted on 03/17/2002 5:30:36 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: TN Republican
I would think we aren't talking 17 years old. They found over 1,000 images, and 100 are deemed "questionable". Given that, I would think the girls must look clearly under-age.

The descriptions included beastiality, S&M and images described as showing children performing sex acts.

Sounds like one sick puppy to me.

127 posted on 03/17/2002 5:59:29 AM PST by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Ok, you'vd done it. I'm completely stunned. And frankly, dismayed that there are so many of these freaks running around free. Terribly dismayed.
128 posted on 03/17/2002 6:02:31 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Couldn't Dorothy have been abducted by some Westerfieldian character, and hypnotized into thinking she'd been through a tornado? And what about TOTO? Hmmmm? Well, makes as much sense as dragging "huge amounts" of plastic sheeting across the street. What does he do with it while he's busy doing the abducting (note: without disturbing the dog, who was in various places according to Damon's testimony, without alerting any of the neighbors--one of whom, remember, was a nosy neighbor--without awakening the other children, without even allowing Danielle to scream or yell)? And he takes the time to roll it out, and wrap the little girl in it? And still no one (not even one of the nosy neighbors) notices a thing? And what if blood drips out one end? Or was this one of your little jokes? If so, good show. Very funny.
129 posted on 03/17/2002 6:11:47 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Kerensky
"Anyone going by would have noticed the vehicle. "

This is a good point, and one that points to someone already in the house. We know some of those people had cars parked there. I have often wondered about the other "party guests" leaving the "party room" for snacks or the bathroom: if everyone is, ahem, very involved, would they miss someone if they were gone long enough to snatch a sleeping child, choroform her, and stash her in a car until they can say their farewells--then drive off "normally". No one knows for sure when Danielle was taken.

130 posted on 03/17/2002 6:16:19 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Kerensky
Another money source might be sales of XXX videos of their...get-togethers. Some time back, it was said they did find such videos in the garage. They would be easy to sell via the internet, I'd imagine.
131 posted on 03/17/2002 6:18:28 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Tuor
"(unless said habits are relevant to the case)."

And that really is the crux of the whole thing, isn't it? Some of us think these habits might be quite relevant. They might have even contributed--directly or indirectly--to this death.

132 posted on 03/17/2002 6:20:53 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: TN Republican; rolling_stone
"I would really like to know if the guy had pictures of prepubescent girls. (There's a difference between 17 and 7.)"

As per Rolling_Stone's transcript from the hearing:

Q)Mr. Armstrong informed you that he found no images depicting children engaged in sexual acts?

A) He informed me he found no.. that he didn't believe they were prepubescent photos or digital images which apparently is what he goes by.

I don't know if this answers your question, but apparently these were not small children he was looking at?

133 posted on 03/17/2002 6:26:58 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TN Republican
I believe the correct answer would be no. The judge in the PH didn't seem to be terribly jack up about these either. The question seems to have been if the girls in the pictures were 16, 17, 18 or 19. There was a picture of a girlfriends daughter in a bikini and that in one she had a towel over her head. The mother was apparently there. The daughter's name was Danielle? Coincidence, a lot of people would like to think so. Danielle was the 28th most popular girls name in the 90's.

Speaking of the judge... Will he be overseeing the festivities at trial or will some one else lose the draw.

134 posted on 03/17/2002 6:27:26 AM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
"...and images described as showing children performing sex acts. "

Not according to the testimony at the hearing. See my #133.

That doesn't mean he's not a sick puppy though. Just that some of the police reports might have been exaggerated by the police or the reporters.

135 posted on 03/17/2002 6:30:22 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: golitely
The police or media exaggerate, I'm shocked, shocked I tell you. If you can't trust the media's interpretation of what the police say who can you trust?

What's so hard to believe that it was someone from inside the house? I just don't by the Dave waited in the closet for at minimum an hour and a half for an opportunity to get even with Brenda, whom he has had only passing contact with.

Does the testimony about the dog getting a nose bleed seem odd to anyone else?

136 posted on 03/17/2002 6:37:05 AM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: DreamWeaver
Sad, very sad. Sad because their parents allowed perverts and immoral "friends" into their home and God only knows if this led to the awful tragedy of their daughter.

If you're suggesting that the little girl was killed because her parents smoked pot, drank beer, and engaged is the swinging lifestyle, then your logic is seriously flawed. From everything I've read, Andrea Yates didn't smoke pot, drink beer, or swing, and God was a very big part of her lifestyle, yet she murdered her own children. If I follow your logic, then one could argue that abstainance and God caused Yates to kill her kids.

BTW, I smoked two hits of pot last night and drank a pint of Harp around midnight -- about two hours after my kids went to sleep. I also had wild sex with a woman who is not my wife. And guess what? Both my kids woke up smiling in their respective beds this morning.

137 posted on 03/17/2002 6:42:40 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Makes you wonder if the dog came after someone (trying to protect Danielle?), and was kicked or hit in the snout. If so, why are the van Dams hiding the details about that?
138 posted on 03/17/2002 6:43:05 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
I've seen even badly abused children smile. Children do their best to survive such horrible lifestyles. Your children's smiles are not evidence of a healthy lifestyle, just evidence of their ability to do their best under the worst of circumstances. One can only hope the CPS pays a visit to your home--soonest.
139 posted on 03/17/2002 6:47:29 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: golitely
Your children's smiles are not evidence of a healthy lifestyle.

Both my children are number one in their classes at school, with near perfect grades and attendance. I've never spanked my kids and I seldom need to raise my voice. They are well behaved and polite and have never gotten themselves into serious trouble. Their teachers say they are a joy to teach and they are both very popular among their peers. My kids love to be around me, and on weekends they beg me to take them fishing or shooting in the fields behind the house. I was up a dawn this morning to buy green bagels and decorate the kitchen for St. Patrick's Day. We then all went to Mass and this afternoon, we're going to a local Irish Restaurant to watch step dancing and share a traditional Irish dinner with family, friends, and neighbors. But I guess your right. I'm a lousy parent.

140 posted on 03/17/2002 7:11:08 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson