Dance Fever For Chelsea and Ian

New York Daily News ^ | 3/08/02 | Rush & Molloy

[OldFriend]

I guess UGLY is in the eye of the beholder. IMHO, this girl is one UGLY lowlife.

[oldcats]

Don't need you guys to give a reason...they are doing a great job on their own, along with their kin.....
How many Clinton kids were forced to go into therapy to circumvent a trial?
How many have been aressted for anything?
How many Clintons have appeared virtually topless on a magazine cover?
So much for "family values".
Oldcats

[oldcats]

As I said in a previous post....Bush twin bashers don't need to find a reason, they bring it on themselves....
Oldcats

[Betteboop]

Please, no, I like Carrot top!!!

[RGSpincich]

How many have been aressted for anything?

Does Roger Clinton count?
How about the Rodham-Clinton boys?
Does "oral sex" front page news make you all warm and cuddly inside ?

[timydnuc]

She still looks like Web Hubble in drag.

[lawdude]

"BOO!"

Gads. That would scare a maggot off gut a wagon!

[mountaineer]

How many Clintons have appeared virtually topless on a magazine cover?

Close enough.

[mountaineer]

Here's the NY Post account of the same bump-and-grind incident:

DADDY'S GIRL

CHELSEA Clinton is learning some sexy new moves from pal Donatella Versace. The formerly frumpy former first daughter dirty-danced with beau Ian Klaus until 2:30 a.m at the bash following Versace's fashion show in Milan the other night, reports Women's Wear Daily. Chelsea slid Klaus' tie around her neck "stripper-style" and ground against him while wearing a black fishnet top and tight black trousers, the trade paper reports. Heather Graham, Ron Wood and Molly Shannon watched her go at it. "I'm having so much fun!" she gushed.

[FITZ]

I don't think she's ugly either. I'd just as soon leave ALL the daughters out of it ---unless they get into politics themselves.

[Aggie Mama]

You are correct. Now, what I want to know is -- is that picture real, and if so, where can I see a copy of it?????

[John O]

I am just against the clowns on Free Republic who make us all look like fools by bashing Chelsea for being ugly when she clearly is not anymore.

Is she still a democrat? Is she still liberal? then she's still ugly.

The black evil of her liberal heart overwhelms any meager attractiveness she could have hoped to inherit from Web.

No democrat (liberal, enemy of my country, call them what you will) is ever attractive once it is known that they cling to that evil

God Save America (Please)

[mymanbush]

WHAT THE HELL IS THAT! ALIEN?

[1Old Pro]

Chelsea bashes herself, she doesn't need anyone's help.

[bdub]

Judge not

[christine]

LOL! :D

[christine]

omg!! chelsea should NOT, i repeat, NOT wear a plunging neckline!!

[Johnny Shear]

That aside, before you complain - have you contributed?

That is none of your business. And you're a jerk for asking it.

Keep making fun of Chelsea's looks...It only makes you look like the pathetic loser you really are. There are PLENTY of reasons to bash a Clinton without having to make-up some.