Charles Pickering’s Record On Civil Rights, Other Key Issues Calls For Rejection By Senate Judiciary

People For The American Way ^ | February 7, 2002 | PFAW-Ralph G. Neas, President

[d14truth]

Democrats on the Judiciary Committee 'Kowtowing' to the People For The American Way???

"Nominee’s record both before and after becoming a federal judge has generated widespread opposition to his elevation to U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit"

"People For the American Way President Ralph G. Neas urged Senate Judiciary Committee members to carefully consider the public record of Judge Charles Pickering and to reject his nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

"Judge Charles Pickering should not be elevated to the appeals court and the Senate Judiciary Committee should reject his nomination," said Neas. "His actions over the past decade as a federal judge and his long public record before that reflect a troubling lack of commitment to fundamental civil and constitutional rights principles."

Neas noted that Pickering’s public record has generated opposition to his confirmation from a broad range of civil rights and other public interest organizations, including the NAACP chapter in Pickering’s home state of Mississippi and the Magnolia Bar Association, the state’s predominantly African American bar group. People For the American Way has published a review of Pickering’s record, as have a number of other public interest organizations.

Because many opponents of Pickering’s confirmation have focused on his troubling civil rights record, said Neas, some Pickering supporters have claimed that his opponents are smearing him as a racist. Neas said People For the American Way has clearly documented that its opposition to Pickering’s elevation to the appeals court is grounded solidly in his public record. "We cannot know what is in Pickering’s heart," said Neas. "But we do know what is in his record. And that is why we are opposing his confirmation to the federal appeals court."

Among the concerns raised by PFAW and other opponents of Pickering’s confirmation:

*His record demonstrates insensitivity and hostility toward key principles and remedies that safeguard civil rights, and indifference toward the problems caused by laws and institutions that have previously created and perpetuated discrimination.

*Even conservative appellate court judges have reversed Judge Pickering on a number of occasions for violating "well-settled principles of law" involving constitutional rights and other matters, and for improperly denying people access to the courts. Another Bush nominee to the 5th Circuit, the recently confirmed Edith Brown Clement, had no such reversals during her tenure as a district judge.

*As a state senator, Pickering co-sponsored and voted for measures harmful to minority voting rights, including a resolution calling on Congress to repeal or weaken key provisions of the federal Voting Rights Act. And as a federal judge, Pickering has gone out of his way to criticize key civil rights principles like "one person-one vote" and to repeatedly disparage plaintiffs in civil rights cases.

*Pickering testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had had no contact with the infamous Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission, which opposed desegregation and infiltrated civil rights organizations to disrupt their efforts. In fact, Pickering went into law practice with a well-known defiant segregationist who served as a member of the Commission for part of the time he was Pickering’s law partner. In the state legislature, Pickering twice voted to fund the Commission.

*In addition, a recently unsealed Commission document states that "Senator Charles Pickering" and two other state legislators were "very interested" in a Commission investigation into union activity that had resulted in a strike against a large employer in Laurel, Pickering’s home town. Some Pickering supporters have suggested that he was concerned about Ku Klux Klan involvement in union violence. The Commission memorandum, however, contains no foundation for such speculation. To the contrary, it states that the request from Pickering and the other legislators was to be "advised of developments in connection with SCEF [Southern Conference Educational Fund] infiltration of GPA [Gulfcoast Pulpwood Association] and full background on James Simmons [President of the GPA]."

*As a law student, Pickering wrote a law review article advising the Mississippi legislature how it could fix a loophole in its law penalizing interracial marriage in order to make the law enforceable. The next year, legislators enacted his recommendations. Although Pickering now says he does not think there should be legal obstacles to interracial marriage, when questioned about the article by the Senate Judiciary Committee he did not repudiate it and tried to brush it aside as an "academic exercise."

*Pickering has opposed Roe v. Wade and the Equal Rights Amendment. He was chair of the Republican Party platform committee that first added an anti-Roe plank to the party platform. His strident anti-choice position is especially troubling in the 5th Circuit, where women’s reproductive rights have already been eroded.

*He has inappropriately used his position on the bench to promote involvement in religious programs by people before him for sentencing.

Neas said Pickering’s record makes him an especially problematic choice for the 5th Circuit, which presides over a three-state area with the largest and most diverse minority population in any Circuit in the country, and which has already decided a number of cases restricting civil and reproductive rights.

Neas said the grassroots effort to defeat Pickering’s nomination would be the first of many unless President Bush engages in genuine bipartisan dialogue with members of the Senate. Neas urged senators, especially members of the Judiciary Committee, to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities to carefully scrutinize judicial nominees and reject those who have not demonstrated a commitment to upholding civil rights.

"Right-wing senators perpetuated dozens of appeals court vacancies by carrying out an unprecedented ideological blockade against judges nominated by President Clinton," said Neas. "Now they hope President Bush will take advantage of those vacancies to fill the appeals courts with right-wing nominees like Charles Pickering."

Neas noted that 35 percent of President Clinton’s appellate court nominees were blocked from 1995-2000; 45 percent failed to receive a vote in the Congress during which they were nominated. Republican-nominated judges currently hold a majority on seven of the 13 circuit courts. If all President Bush’s current nominees are approved, such judges will make up a majority on 11 circuit courts. And by the end of 2004, Republican-appointed judges could make up a majority on every one of the 13 circuit courts.

"A federal judiciary completely dominated by right-wing judges would be a disaster for Americans’ rights and freedoms," said Neas. "Senators must be willing to say no to Judge Pickering and they must be willing to say no to right-wing efforts to pack the federal judiciary."

[d14truth]

"A federal judiciary completely dominated by right-wing judges would be a disaster for Americans’ rights and freedoms," said Neas.
*****
Bet he wouldn't object to a majority of left-wing ones, now, would he?
*****
Smear campaign on a good man and a good judge. Just not to 'their' standards.

[WIMom]

It is not fun posting on every thread and annoying all of you. We are volunteers and do so because we love Free Republic and want to see it continue for a long time.

Ask yourself these questions:

Where is the first place I go to on the internet to find out what's happening with politics?
Am I getting any benefit from Free Republic?
Am I learning from Free Republic?

Free Republic is not free. It costs Jim Robinson tens of thousands of dollars to keep this forum running. There are almost 80,000 registered users on Free Republic and approximately 1,000 Freepers help keep this forum running. Those who do not have the ability to donate money could help by bumping the threads once in a while. I've been in a position where the funds were low and every penny was needed to pay for frivolous things such as food. Those who do have the means should be ashamed of yourselves. You are a FReeploader. Go ahead, flame me. I don't care. I contribute to Free Republic, and I for one do not want to see this forum dead.

If everyone who registered donated one measly dollar a month, we would never have to have a fundraiser again. Thus ending the silly graphics and posts. But, it's not happening, so we will continue this annoying process until we reach our goal.

Because The Constitution Still Matters - Freepathon Thread 2

Or Mail your check to:
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

To donate By Paypal:
Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

[Stand Watch Listen]

Related Articles:

Pickering Battle Places Congress on Verge of 'Institutional Crisis'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 07, 2002;
Author: Jeff Johnson

Make them pay for 'Borking': David Limbaugh rebukes spineless Republicans to support Pickering
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: March 5, 2002;
Author: David Limbaugh

The GOP's Post-Pickering Strategy
Source: National Review Online; Published: March 1, 2002;
Author: Byron York

Pickering Fight Shows Liberals At Their Worst
Source: Roll Call.com; Publblished: February 21, 2002;
Author: Mort Kondracke

Still Pestering Pickering
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 19, 2002;
Author: John Nowacki

Dismantling Democracy through Judicial Activism
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 12, 2002;
Author:Tom Jipping

'A Troubling Pattern': Ideology Over Truth In Judicial Confirmations
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: February 10, 2002;
Author: Paul E. Scates

Democrats Blast Bush Judicial Nominee
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published: February 08, 2002;
Susan Jones

The Next Big Fight: The first major judicial-confirmation battle of the Bush administration.
Source: National Review: Published: Feburary 6, 2002;
Author:Byron York

SYMPOSIUM Q: Should the Senate Take Ideology into Account in Judicial Confirmations
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 4, 2002;
Authors:
Ralph G. Neas -- YES: The ideology of nominees for the federal judiciary matters more now than ever
Roger Pilon -- NO: Since judges apply law, not make it, the Senate's concern should be with judicial temperament

What is the Judiciary Committee Trying to Hide?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 29, 2002;
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Blasting Conservative Judges: Liberals Launch Their Campaign
Source: cnsnews.com; Published: January 24 2002;
Matt Pyeatt

Judicial Confirmation Lies, Deception and Cover-up
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: December 11, 2001
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Senator Leahy Does Not Meet His Own Standards
Source:.cnsnews.com; Published: December 07, 2001
Author: By John Nowacki

Senator Daschle Must Remove 'Leaky Leahy' From Judiciary Committee
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 4, 2001
Author: Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

A Disgraceful Blocking of Nominees
Source: The Wall Street Journal (ltr to ed) Published December 3, 2001

Mr. Leahy's Fuzzy Math
Source: Washington Times;Published: December 3, 2001
Author:Editorial

Sen. Patrick Leahy; Our Constitutional Conscience?
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 2, 2001
Author: Paul E. Scates

Judicial confirmations called significantly low
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 30, 2001
Author: Audrey Hudson

Patrick Leahy - Words Do Kill
Source: PipeBombNews.com; Published: November 29, 2001
Author: William A. Mayer

Judicial Profiling
Source: The Wall Street Journal; Published: November 27, 2001

Sen. Leahy's judicial hostages
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 21, 2001

Judges Delayed is Justice Denied
Source: CNSNews.com ; Published: November 20, 2001;
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Partisanship is Prevalent with Leahy's Judicial Confirmations
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 15, 2001
Author: John Nowacki

Leahy And Daschle Are Coming Face To Face With Their Own Words
Author: John Nowacki

Obedient Democrats
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published October 26, 2001
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Why is Daschle Blocking Judges needed to Try Terrorists when we Catch them?
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published:October 26, 2001
Author: Mary Mostert

Pat Leahy's Passive Aggressive Game
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 25, 2001
Author: John Nowacki

Operation Obstruct Justice
Source: Washington Times; Published: October 25, 2001
Author: T.L.Jipping

Daschle wins struggle over judicial nominations
Source: The Washington Times; Published: Oct 24, 2001
Author: Dave Boyer

Leahy doctrine ensures judicial gridlock
Source: Washington Times; Published October 22, 2001

Senate's judicial powergrab: Tom Jipping tracks Dems' assault on courts
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: June 28, 2001
Author: Tom Jipping

Dems Will Shut Down Judicial Confirmations
Source: CNSNews.com Commentary from the Free Congress Foundation; Published: June 13, 2001;
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

[d14truth]

This is what the 'lamestream' won't attack. Yet, they will chew up and spit out Falwell, Robertson, and Dobson at every turn. Thank you for FreeRepublic, where we can point out the atrocities of the left without the 'soft spin' given them by their media accomplices.

[d14truth]

Your list is what got me to searching. Thank you, SWL.

[Ohioan]

If one could pick one loathsome group, which one would most like to be opposed by, so that one could be judged by the enemies one has made, many of us would give long consideration to having that most loathsome group be People For The American Way. There are other bad apples in America, probably just as bad, but none that excel in pure evil, the evil of this hate-filled organization.

We have dealt with them in some detail in How To Recognize The Bigot In The Argument. I can think of no better reason to endorse Judge Pickering, than the opposition of these people.

William Flax

[eisch]

If People for the American Way, the ACLU, the NAACP don't like this guy----

Then I know I will!!!

I hope the "right" pressure is applied so Pickering can come to the full vote of the Senate, where he will be confirmed!

[Alissa]

Have you added the monthly payments to this yet?????

[d14truth]

Yes, they were added a couple of hours ago.

[d14truth]

The view from the 'Far Left' on Judge Pickering.

[Homer_J_Simpson]

I've always thought of this bunch as the most grotesquely misnamed organization around. They are the exact opposite of what they call themselves.

[Alissa]

So little facts and so much spin in this diatribe.

[wjcsux]

You forgot the mandatory barf alert. Anything from these idiots must have one!

[d14truth]

"I've always thought of this bunch as the most grotesquely misnamed organization around. They are the exact opposite of what they call themselves."

I agree. However, their ideology/religion encourages 'disinformation'/LIES; which necessitates our unending vigilance.

[rdf]

Agreed. Thank God for FR, and for folks like Keyes who will come out for Pickering and other appointees of integrity.

Cheers,

Richard F.

[d14truth]

"You forgot the mandatory barf alert."

I'm hoping a 1,000 FReepers will point that out.

[liberalism=failure]

Bush has enormous political capital, he should try and use it for a change.

[d14truth]

"So little facts and so much spin in this diatribe."

Our job is to 'unspin' for the Senators who represent 100% of us.(Not just those in 'their' party.)

[d14truth]

"Bush has enormous political capital, he should try and use it for a change."

Bush has given us enormous political capital, we should try to use it for a change.

[Ohioan]

I've always thought of this bunch as the most grotesquely misnamed organization around. They are the exact opposite of what they call themselves.

That is correct. But that is the way Fabian Socialists operate. Their function is to smear any organization that really believes in the American Way, by making it seem motivated by hate. But it is the PFAW which are motivated by pure hate--hatred of the America that better men won for us.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site