Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Comedian arrested in scuffle with security at San Francisco airport
Sacramento Bee ^ | March 4, 2002 | Unattributed

Posted on 03/05/2002 5:29:27 AM PST by Ignatz

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:33:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Published 8:15 a.m. PST Monday, March 4, 2002 SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A stand-up comedian was arrested after he allegedly got into a loud argument and a scuffle with a National Guardsman at San Francisco International Airport. Kevin Meaney, 45, allegedly grabbed the soldier's loaded M-16 rifle with both hands and got into a shoving match with him Sunday after airport authorities repeatedly asked the comedian to stop videotaping checkpoint security procedures, authorities said.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
It has been against federal law to videotape such activities since the Sept. 11 attacks

The lessons of Tiannamen Square were not lost on the Feds, eh?

"If a Government abuse occurs and not all of the people are aware of it, did it really happen?"

1 posted on 03/05/2002 5:29:27 AM PST by Ignatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
bump
2 posted on 03/05/2002 5:32:33 AM PST by Ignatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
bumpitty-bump
3 posted on 03/05/2002 5:32:57 AM PST by Ignatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
"Who put the bump in the bump-she-bump-she-bump...."
4 posted on 03/05/2002 5:33:38 AM PST by Ignatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
It seems that defeating the terrorists means putting up with being treated as one.
5 posted on 03/05/2002 5:37:09 AM PST by toupsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
The National Guard said Meaney also became verbally abusive when security staff asked to pat-search his wife. Provocation? Fighting words? Were the security staff seeking to incite violence? Obviously the reporting was -- as always -- onesided. Nonetheless, will anyone who is familiar with the appropriate standards explain how the authorities might conceivably have been justified in this request?

Or, in tin-foil terms, are we approaching Soylent Green?

6 posted on 03/05/2002 5:39:53 AM PST by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Posted here
7 posted on 03/05/2002 5:42:27 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Gosh, he thought he had a right to video tape government goons performing duty in a public area and to keep his wife from being felt up by some 19 year old pimple faced grinning ape? The nerve of the man. Where does he think he lives, America or something?
8 posted on 03/05/2002 5:47:49 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Dad-burnit! I searched the News/Events page specifically for this article before I posted!

Appy's correct, y'all, go here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/639638/posts

As for me, it's back to the eye doctor!

9 posted on 03/05/2002 6:00:44 AM PST by Ignatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Did any of you people happen to think that a terrorist organization would welcome a tape of security procedures? What better way to circumvent security than to tape the procedures and study them for weaknesses! Can you see past the end of your nose?
10 posted on 03/05/2002 6:15:46 AM PST by History is truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
I love to play grumble freak as much as the next person when it comes to government agencies. I also have been known to dabble in the Government is big brother game myself. But come on. If we can't count on the American public to stay vigil and cooperate with the airline security, then where does that leave us?

I for one have no sympathy for anyone who tries to override airline security, or to make a joke about it.

There are other options for fliers. Walk, run ,ride the train. You could also take a boat a bike or trike. I don't really care how you get there, just go. For those trying to make trouble for the security of this country I say a double go to them.

11 posted on 03/05/2002 6:40:22 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Kevin Meaney, 45, allegedly grabbed the soldier's loaded M-16 rifle. . . .

(In my best Kevin's-mom voice:)

"You'll poke your eye out!"

12 posted on 03/05/2002 6:48:23 AM PST by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
. . . he allegedly got into a loud argument and a scuffle with a National Guardsman. . . .

"What'd you go and do that for? Scuffling with a National Guardsman. . . . We'll lose the house!"

13 posted on 03/05/2002 6:52:17 AM PST by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toupsie
I couldn't agree more with your statement. All of us are benig treated as terrorists' 80-yr old Grandmas and 3-yr old are being strip-searched.

Am I the only one who remembers that most of the perps on 9/11 were Saudis?

We are so afraid of being accused of "profiling", we are afraid to the DO the profiling that is necessary. How stupid is that?

This PC crap has gone this far, folks, and it leads us right to the ridiculous. I hope that what the Israeli security guys have been telling Congress about the necessity of profiling, sinks in.

14 posted on 03/05/2002 6:52:28 AM PST by TruthNtegrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
It's fairly disturbing this phenomena of "you either submit with a smile or you're with the terrorists" -- I can write off a large part of it as human nature but am waiting for a return to sanity that seems a long time coming.

I get the feeling that some of us fight the war by throwing our freedom at it.

15 posted on 03/05/2002 7:52:20 AM PST by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Elsie
Your argument loses credibility when you resort to name calling. And no, people don't lounge around security checkpoints taking notes. A witness' memory is notoriously bad. Reviewing a videotape multiple times allows a person to spot things they don't see at first viewing.

Why are you so paranoid about law enforcement personnel? Thousands of them do an outstanding job every day. They are people doing their job. They are not some vast conspiracy trying to deprive you of some your rights. They are just trying to protect the public.

17 posted on 03/06/2002 5:22:29 AM PST by History is truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: History is truth
can't you see past the end of your nose?
Oh? And just what would you call THIS???
18 posted on 03/06/2002 1:15:29 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
You are an (hurt my poor widdle feelings word)!

is a statement.


Are you a (hurt my poor widdle feelings word)?

is a question.



19 posted on 03/06/2002 1:17:37 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: History is truth
Your argument loses credibility when you resort to name calling.
2+2=4

If you don't think 2+2=4, you might be an idiot.


Ah, yes..... I see your point.
20 posted on 03/06/2002 1:20:03 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson