Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA evidence 'clears Libya' of Lockerbie (Iran has done it)
Sundat Herald ^ | 22 february 2002 | Neil Mackay

Posted on 02/23/2002 9:19:39 AM PST by knighthawk

Megrahi's appeal team ignored 'evidence' from key CIA investigator that claims Iran was behind PanAm 103 bombing INVESTIGATION

By Neil Mackay, Home Affairs Editor, John Ashton in Washington and Ian Ferguson in Camp Zeist

ONE of the CIA's leading Lockerbie bomb investigators has come forward with compelling evidence that Libya was not behind the downing of PanAm 103 which killed 270 people. Robert Baer, a retired senior CIA agent, offered to meet the defence team leading the appeal of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, who was convicted last year of the bombing. However, his offer was not accepted and the new evidence never raised in court.

The new evidence, according to Baer, shows Iran masterminded and funded the bombing; implicates the Palestinian terrorist unit, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC), as the group behind the plot; and reveals that just two days after the December 21 1988 bombing the PFLP-GC received $11 million (£7.6m), paid into a Swiss bank account by Iran.

Legal experts say the new evidence should have been brought before the court, and are asking why Megrahi's defence didn't take up the offer.

Megrahi's appeal, which took place at a special Scottish court sitting at Camp Zeist in Holland, adjourned on Thursday for judges to consider whether to overturn the original verdict.

Baer claims he is breaking his silence now because of growing disillusionment with the CIA's counter-terrorist operations and the war on terror.

Baer, an anti-terrorist specialist, was one of the key CIA officers investigating Lockerbie. He says the CIA received definitive evidence that the PFLP-GC struck a deal with Iranian intelligence agents in July 1988 to take down an American airliner.

Baer also has details of an $11m payment made to the PFLP-GC. On December 23 1988 the money was paid into a bank account used by the terror group in Lausanne, Switzerland. It was transferred to another PFLP-GC account at the Banque Nationale de Paris and moved to the Hungarian Trade Development Bank.

A terrorist linked to the PFLP-GC, Abu Talb, who was later jailed for terrorist offences in Sweden, was also paid $500,000 (£350,000). The money went into an account in Talb's name in Frankfurt four months after the bombing, on April 25 1989.

Germany was a key base for the PFLP-GC in the late 1980s. Baer has the number of at least one of these bank accounts.

Talb and the PFLP-GC were to have been implicated by lawyers working for Megrahi and his co-accused, Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, at the original trial, but little evidence was ever raised to show they were part of the Lockerbie plot.

On legal advice Baer is not disclosing his Lockerbie records, but the Sunday Herald has seen CIA paperwork that supports his claims. British and US intelligence have always publicly denied that the PFLP-GC played a part in the Lockerbie plot, saying raids by German police two months before the Lockerbie bombing took the terror group out of action.

Baer says, however, that these arrests were a mere hiccup in PFLP-GC plans as other members of the German unit rem ained at large. This theory also fits with claims that the bomb began its journey in Frankfurt, rather than Malta, where Megrahi was based.

PFLP-GC leader Hafez Dalkamoni and the group's chief bomb-maker, Marwan Khreesat, were arrested in Germany in October 1988 in possession of a Toshiba radio-cassette player containing a bomb. PanAm 103 flew from Frankfurt and was destroyed by a bomb built inside a Toshiba radio-cassette.

Timers matching the one used in the Lockerbie device were sold to both Libya and the East German secret service, the Stasi, which had close links to the PFLP-GC. 'I don't know what components the bomb contained,' Baer said, 'but there was very reliable information from multiple sources that (the PFLP-GC) were running around between East and West Germany and Sweden, trying to get the operation back on track. It's conceivable that the Stasi supplied components during a trip to East Germany.'

Baer said the components for the bomb were supplied by a terrorist known as Abu Elias, who was for a time the CIA's prime suspect but was never caught. 'He was the big centre of the investigation, but he was very elusive,' Baer said. Khreesat and Dalkamoni were on their way to meet Abu Elias when they were arrested in Germany. Abu Elias was a close associate of Abu Talb. Both lived in Sweden.

Talb had made a trip to Malta just weeks before the Lockerbie bombing. Clothes from a shop in Malta were packed in the suitcase which contained the PanAm 103 bomb.

Baer also claims the CIA has irrefutable intelligence that Talb and Dalkamoni were Iranian agents and were on a government roll of honour for their services to the 'Islamic revolutionary struggle against the west'. Baer add ed: 'Although it was not specific, Dalkamoni's citation praised him for achieving Iran's greatest- ever strike against the west'.

Iran had vowed 'the skies would rain with American blood' after a US battle cruiser, the USS Vincennes, accidentally shot down an Iranian Airbus over the Persian Gulf, killing 290 people, six months before the Lockerbie bombing.

'It doesn't take a genius to figure out where the $11m came from,' says Baer. He added that 'the information [would] be useful to the defence as much of it was of a type that would be admissible in court. Once the investigators had the timer evidence, which seemed to point to Libya, they stopped pursuing other leads -- that's the way most criminal investigations work. People sleep better at night if they think they have justice. Who wants an unsolved airplane bombing?'

Edinburgh University law professor Robert Black, the architect of the Lockerbie trial, said of Megrahi's defence not seeking to interview Baer: 'I don't know why they would act like this. Real hard evidence of a money transfer from Iran to the PFLP-GC is so supportive of the alternative theory behind the bombing that I'm at a loss to explain their actions.

'At the very least, you would interview the source of the information and make a decision once you have spoken to him. A lawyer's job is to provide a belt-and-braces defence for his client, so to refuse to even meet with Baer requires a lot of explaining.'


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bobbaer; lockerbie; panam103
Heard some rumors of it some days ago. But now the name of the ex-CIA guy is out also.
1 posted on 02/23/2002 9:19:39 AM PST by knighthawk (knighthawk@wish.nl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: golitely; rebdov; Nix 2; viadexter
Ping
2 posted on 02/23/2002 9:19:58 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk; _jim; lawdog
Bump
4 posted on 02/23/2002 10:36:37 AM PST by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Let's see... when it wasn't opportune for Iran to be the guilty party, Libya was guilty. Now that we need a reason for taking on Iran, behold!

How much can we trust such convenient testimony, even from an 'unofficial' source?

5 posted on 02/23/2002 10:40:59 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut
With all the interaction between terrorists and sponsor states, it doesn't make any difference who was guilty *when* anymore. Thet are ALL guilty. They threw all their money, arms, and evil into the pot and stirred a great evil. All should be treated as such.
6 posted on 02/23/2002 11:00:37 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
At the start of this years NFL season I remember watching a 60 minutes were they interviewed a man who defected from Iran, je claimed to have proof that Iran was behind Lockerbie, as well as other acts against the US. Does anyone who saw that show have any follow up?
7 posted on 02/23/2002 11:26:14 AM PST by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut
The independent journalist and investment newsletter guru, Harry Schultz, said on more than one occasion that geo-politics is a filthy cesspool of lies and deceit. Looks like the powers that be have laid the groundwork for a new pile that we can all gather 'round for a two minute hate.
8 posted on 02/23/2002 12:18:10 PM PST by Anthem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
The second theme running through all of these stories is how terrorist friendly the feckless socialist countries of Europe really are. It appears that they need a few attacks on them to rouse them from their klintoon like slumbering.
9 posted on 02/23/2002 12:18:19 PM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: illbenice
I am not at all suprised. I would bet a number of terror events were covered up becuase we have an ongoing "cold war" with the nation behind it. But with as treasonous a slimball as Clinton in charge, who knows what damage was done in the name of his Fabian quest?
10 posted on 02/23/2002 12:46:14 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
ALL these fanatic groups work in concert, funded by Saudi and other arabian oil dollars. Destroy the Saudi tribal state and you end the bankroling of these terrorists and terrorist states with our petro-dollars.
11 posted on 02/23/2002 12:51:42 PM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Nix 2
With all the interaction between terrorists and sponsor states, it doesn't make any difference who was guilty *when* anymore.

Hmmm. I don't disagree with you out of principle. Since 9/11, I've been in the "bomb everyone let God sort 'em out" mode and still am- but think about it. If Libya's name had never been connected to Lockerbie- would their country's name be so stigmatized now? We hate Libya... because of Lockerbie. Libya, recently and since 9/11 has made many "nice gestures" towards our country including the radical statement (for an Islamic country) that "the USA has a right to defend itself".

All I'm saying is- if this is true, it is extremely relevant and being as how Ghadafi is making concilliatory noises, it might not be such a bad thing to acknowledge it if it's the truth. It was a different admin that bombed Libya, they support our bombing Afghanistan etc and they have a lot of oil. If we were suddenly on nice/nice terms with Libya- Saudi wouldn't seem like such a good buddy any more.

Flame away.

13 posted on 02/23/2002 1:21:28 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
No flames, so. You are right on this. I would like to know more about the Libyan ties to the Nation of Islam here in the US first. But if that is clean, I have no real disagreement with you.
14 posted on 02/23/2002 1:37:40 PM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
You are right on this.

Well, I wouldn't go that far.

I'm like you, I would like to know all the facts and that includes whatever the CIA might have to ante up. If Libya was behind Lockerbie- well, let them have Hell to pay. But if not...It changes things doesn't it?

15 posted on 02/23/2002 1:47:16 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Baer claims he is breaking his silence now because of growing disillusionment with the CIA's counter-terrorist operations and the war on terror.

How convenient, now that Iran is part of the Axis of Evil, and Libya is off the map. Wonder if this is a real story or Office of Strategic Information BS? We'll never know again, will we.

16 posted on 02/23/2002 1:53:22 PM PST by patlaw_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anthem
Exactly.

Syria was the original culprit, but then we needed them for the Gulf War. Then, it was Libya, although the evidence was virtually non-existent. However, recently MQ has made serious progess toward becoming a major player on the African continent

Now, it is Iran.

17 posted on 02/23/2002 2:00:53 PM PST by Boyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Lybia is not clean in the terror game, either. Lybia is one of the places that Al-Quida members were fleeing to during early stages of the recent unpleasantness in Afghanistan. However, they did start arresting the Al-Quida folks after the collapse of the Taleban. Yemen, The Sudan, Somalia, Syria, France, Germany, England, Canada and even Pakistan, Iran and Indonesia have cracked down on the terrorists they've been harboring.
18 posted on 02/23/2002 2:13:24 PM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
This accident (Lockerbie) was too similar to THREE other situations ALSO involving Boeing 747 aircraft for which a case can be made that the outward opening forwrd cargo bay door failed causing a catastrophic chain of events including starboard-side engines that were heavily fodded from passengers and luggage (from the cargo bay) sucked out a large hole that was subsequently torn in the fuselage beginning in the area of the failed forward cargo bay door ...
19 posted on 02/23/2002 5:36:03 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson