Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRULOCK CASE AGAINST WEN HO LEE DISMISSED AT REQUEST OF PRESIDENT BUSH
Judicial Watch ^ | February 12, 2002 | Press release

Posted on 02/12/2002 6:15:54 PM PST by tgslTakoma

Bush Justice Department's Actions Protect Convicted Felon Who Violated National Security

Judicial Watch To Appeal Lower Court's Grant of Bush Administration Request

(Washington, D.C.). Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, has been litigating defamation lawsuits against convicted felon Wen Ho Lee and others who, to deflect blame for their own actions, slandered and libeled Trulock. Specifically, as part of a media, public relations campaign, these defendants claimed in widely published reports that Trulock had singled Wen Ho Lee out for prosecution because he is ethnic Chinese, a variation of the O.J. Simpson defense. As a result, Trulock, a hero who blew the whistle on the biggest breach of nuclear security since the Rosenbergs at Los Alamos National Laboratories, lost his job and had his reputation destroyed.

A later government report which issued in Judicial Watch's litigation on behalf of Trulock proved that he had not engaged in “racial profiling.” Nevertheless, Wen Ho Lee recently published another defamatory book making these and other claims, further damaging Trulock, who is now destitute and penny-less. It hit the bookstores on January 15, 2002.

During discovery in the cases brought for Trulock, Judicial Watch obtained admissions from Wen Ho Lee that he had never been discriminated against, and did not even know what racial profiling is. Further, he was forced to admit that the government had valid reasons to investigate him.(emphasis added)

Nevertheless, just days before trial, which was scheduled to begin February 19, the full weight of the Bush Justice Department was used by the administration to intervene in Judicial Watch's private cases for Trulock, to argue that if the trial was allowed to proceed, that national security would be violated.

The lower court granted the Bush Justice Department's request to stop the cases this afternoon, on the eve of trial. Judicial Watch will appeal on behalf of Trulock.

Already, another case filed before the same court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which was dismissed, has been reinstated by the Fourth Circuit. This reinstated case involves Trulock's claims against former FBI Director Louis Freeh for violating his constitutional rights.

“The Bush Justice Department feared that if the Trulock defamation cases went to trial that it would be embarrassed for allowing Wen Ho Lee to violate national security, and for this reason conjured up a bogus argument, backed by secret CIA affidavits submitted to the court ex parte, that trying this simple defamation case would itself breach national security. This action by the administration amounts to a cover-up of the negligence of the FBI, which allowed Wen Ho Lee to pick the pockets of the American nuclear arsenal. To this day, Lee cannot account for the whereabouts of the secrets he stole,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushclinton; bushknew; busk911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
, but we need to know the truth of what the last president did. To do anything else is dereliction of duty.

I agree, but what if it would cause national panic? There's a lot of weak people in this country. FReepers are special. Good looking, strong, and above average.

21 posted on 02/12/2002 7:07:39 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Fair enough. You're the village idiot.
22 posted on 02/12/2002 7:08:48 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
damn... Notra is a hero... timing is bad on this oneb
23 posted on 02/12/2002 7:12:49 PM PST by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Can I get on someone's bump list that'll advise when Ashcroft ever actually does anything?
24 posted on 02/12/2002 7:14:35 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Good looking, strong, and above average.

Shades of Praire Home Companion

25 posted on 02/12/2002 7:15:01 PM PST by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
...besides obfuscate and rhetoricize.
26 posted on 02/12/2002 7:16:13 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
You're the village idiot.

Take the mirror away from your face and try again Ferd.

27 posted on 02/12/2002 7:16:52 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
This press release doesn't include any statements from the DOJ or the Court.

It is useless to a reasonable person.

28 posted on 02/12/2002 7:18:49 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
But it's true.
29 posted on 02/12/2002 7:19:39 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blackbag
Indeed.
30 posted on 02/12/2002 7:20:39 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma; Judicial Watch
Good call! Prepare for the attack of the Kool-Aid-drinking, Bush-pimping Klayman-haters! However, I thought Mr. Lee was ultimately cleared of his charges.
31 posted on 02/12/2002 7:30:23 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Wen Ho Lee is innocent. He was persecuted by Clintonistas because he fit the profile - and Bill Richardson didn't.
32 posted on 02/12/2002 7:36:19 PM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
SERIOUSLY. HAS JUDICIAL WATCH EVER WON A CASE?
HAVE THEY PUT ANYONE IN JAIL OR PUNISHED THEM?
HAVE THEY BROUGHT THE CLINTONS TO JUSTICE?
I used to contribute to JW but have stopped.
I will do it again when I see some results.
33 posted on 02/12/2002 7:40:28 PM PST by Swampfox One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl,amom
FYI ping
34 posted on 02/12/2002 7:44:21 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl,amom
FYI ping
35 posted on 02/12/2002 7:44:24 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug; tgslTakoma
Can I get on someone's bump list that'll advise when A-G Janet Ashcroft ever actually does anything?

I vote for him and Colon Powell to take a lunch together -- or, better yet, a hike!

36 posted on 02/12/2002 7:45:16 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
I am out here in New Mexico(the scene of the crime)so I know a little about all this (probably very little)....The case against Lee was embarrasing at best,Richardson and some of his co-horts bear a lot of responsibility,and I still believe Trulock was a goodguy....A big fat mess all around,with the Clinton administration's smudged and greasy prints on it all.
37 posted on 02/12/2002 7:46:23 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
just days before trial, which was scheduled to begin February 19, the full weight of the Bush Justice Department was used by the administration to intervene in Judicial Watch's private cases for Trulock, to argue that if the trial was allowed to proceed, that national security would be violated.

A defamation suit, and national security could be violated?

Stay well Fred, we could be in for some really rough times.

38 posted on 02/12/2002 7:46:49 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; ChaseR
Doug, I sure hope someone gets a second chance to ask the President some questions.
39 posted on 02/12/2002 7:48:23 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
!
40 posted on 02/12/2002 7:49:07 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson