Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious Force Holds Back NASA Probe In Deep Space
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-10-2002 | Robert Matthews

Posted on 02/09/2002 6:34:49 PM PST by blam

Mysterious force holds back Nasa probe in deep space

By Robert Matthews, Science Correspondent
(Filed: 10/02/2002)

A SPACE probe launched 30 years ago has come under the influence of a force that has baffled scientists and could rewrite the laws of physics.

Researchers say Pioneer 10, which took the first close-up pictures of Jupiter before leaving our solar system in 1983, is being pulled back to the sun by an unknown force. The effect shows no sign of getting weaker as the spacecraft travels deeper into space, and scientists are considering the possibility that the probe has revealed a new force of nature.

Dr Philip Laing, a member of the research team tracking the craft, said: "We have examined every mechanism and theory we can think of and so far nothing works.

"If the effect is real, it will have a big impact on cosmology and spacecraft navigation," said Dr Laing, of the Aerospace Corporation of California.

Pioneer 10 was launched by Nasa on March 2 1972, and with Pioneer 11, its twin, revolutionised astronomy with detailed images of Jupiter and Saturn. In June 1983, Pioneer 10 passed Pluto, the most distant planet in our solar system.

Both probes are now travelling at 27,000mph towards stars that they will encounter several million years from now. Scientists are continuing to monitor signals from Pioneer 10, which is more than seven billion miles from Earth.

Research to be published shortly in The Physical Review, a leading physics journal, will show that the speed of the two probes is being changed by about 6 mph per century - a barely-perceptible effect about 10 billion times weaker than gravity.

Scientists initially suspected that gas escaping from tiny rocket motors aboard the probes, or heat leaking from their nuclear power plants might be responsible. Both have now been ruled out. The team says no current theories explain why the force stays constant: all the most plausible forces, from gravity to the effect of solar radiation, decrease rapidly with distance.

The bizarre behaviour has also eliminated the possibility that the two probes are being affected by the gravitational pull of unknown planets beyond the solar system.

Assertions by some scientists that the force is due to a quirk in the Pioneer probes have also been discounted by the discovery that the effect seems to be affecting Galileo and Ulysses, two other space probes still in the solar system. Data from these two probes suggests the force is of the same strength as that found for the Pioneers.

Dr Duncan Steel, a space scientist at Salford University, says even such a weak force could have huge effects on a cosmic scale. "It might alter the number of comets that come towards us over millions of years, which would have consequences for life on Earth. It also raises the question of whether we know enough about the law of gravity."

Until 1988, Pioneer 10 was the most remote object made by man - a distinction now held by Voyager 1. Should Pioneer 10 make contact with alien life, it carries a gold-plated aluminium plaque on which the figures of a man and woman are shown to scale, along with a map showing its origin that Nasa calls "the cosmic equivalent of a message in a bottle".


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astronomy; heliopause; heliosphere; pioneer10; pioneer11; science; space; voyager1; voyager2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: strela
"Very funny, Scotty. Now turn the tractor beam OFF."My nominee for quote of the week.
22 posted on 02/09/2002 6:56:02 PM PST by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
cosmology ?????? .........Avon and Mark Kay aware of this ?

serious side, very kewl read. I wonder if Art Bells great scientific minds are on this yet ?

Stay Safe !

23 posted on 02/09/2002 6:57:25 PM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
Correction that is "Veeja".
24 posted on 02/09/2002 6:58:04 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Do you think the "gold plated aluminum" pressing of a man and woman "done to scale" has a woman with Hillary's ass?

Maybe it is just some Senator trying to force them to come back for an upkeep or refurbishment at one of their local constituent run businesses?

25 posted on 02/09/2002 6:58:25 PM PST by Glick & Burnett live on.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
This is a serious and/or critical discovery. It would help us understand the laws of space/time and the effects that they have when the interact outide of certain gravitational and speed effects. This is very... very... very... interesting.
26 posted on 02/09/2002 6:59:41 PM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: strela
Sorry strela I just realized I was logged on under my wife's screename; "glick & burnett live on.".
27 posted on 02/09/2002 7:00:57 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
...drag due to interstellar gas...

My initial thought too. Perhaps related to the same force that initiates/starts up/creates comets as well?

28 posted on 02/09/2002 7:01:07 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: *Space
bump
29 posted on 02/09/2002 7:01:46 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
"drag due to interstellar gas"
Impact and accretion of cosmic debris would about fit their measurements IMHO.

"Look here brother-who you jiving with that cosmik debris?
Now is that a real space probe or is that a Sears space probe?"

30 posted on 02/09/2002 7:02:03 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GreenLanternCorps

Yeah, Yoda, that's hilarious. Will you leave the dang probes alone now?

31 posted on 02/09/2002 7:02:06 PM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
Dr Philip Laing, a member of the research team tracking the craft, said: "We have examined every mechanism and theory we can think of and so far nothing works.

"If the effect is real, it will have a big impact on cosmology and spacecraft navigation," said Dr Laing, of the Aerospace Corporation of California.

Looks like another round of Trolling for Dollars.

32 posted on 02/09/2002 7:06:19 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
lol
33 posted on 02/09/2002 7:06:28 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: blam

34 posted on 02/09/2002 7:06:49 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is obviously due to cosmic warming.
35 posted on 02/09/2002 7:07:01 PM PST by Ragdaltx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Replying to "Glick & Burnett ..." was an interesting experience as well. For some reason, I had to type in the ampersand manually to get it to work.
36 posted on 02/09/2002 7:10:55 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Plus, call me nuts, but I think the scientists would have thought of that....I highly doubt some Freeper speculation will arrive at a possibility they have not thought of....
37 posted on 02/09/2002 7:10:58 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam

38 posted on 02/09/2002 7:13:46 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I believe this effect can be blamed on Enron!
39 posted on 02/09/2002 7:20:14 PM PST by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Maybe not gas or dust, but, there are only two (well, 2.5) things that would meet the known facts (i.e., apparent immunity to the inverse square law). The first would be in effect the opposite of a "force", i.e., a resistance (such as gas or dust). Now, a resistance can be created, I believe, by a force, i.e., magnetic braking and so forth. Whether or not that's likely I cannot speculate.

The other thing (or thing and a half) would not really violate the inverse square law, but only seem to violate it. That thing would be an attractive (or repulsive, hence the "and a half" literary vehicle :)) force with a source located so far away as to make the force gradient so gradual as to be below any threshold of measurement. (At close range, the gradient is very steep, at long range, it becomes increasingly consistent.)

So, perhaps there's a large, (perhaps dark) object located somewhere far to the other side of the Sun from the probe, exerting a slight pull, apparently constant due to the great distance from the probe.

However, if the effect is seen on two probes that are aimed in different directions relative to the Sun, then it would shoot that theory down.

Maybe it's just the aether wind, flowing towards the Sun. :)

40 posted on 02/09/2002 7:24:19 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson