Posted on 02/04/2002 6:15:27 PM PST by JoeMomma
Robert Locke |
|
AMERICA'S GENEROUS IMMIGRATION LAWS
are increasingly being corrupted and taken advantage of by self-aware economic interests. Take, for example, the H1-B visa program for technical workers, which was recently expanded to 200,000 people per year by the Clinton administration. H1-B allows corporations to bring in cheap foreign technical labor in the computer industry and elsewhere. This is shrinking opportunities for American citizens, driving down their wages, and stunting the production of homegrown talent.Industry likes to tell the public that they need to bring in foreign workers because of a so-called "labor shortage." But the very concept of a labor shortage is a sophistry that has no place in free-market economics. Economics teaches that in a free market there are never shortages of anything, only things whose price, as set by supply and demand, is higher than some person wishes to pay. There is not a technical job in America that could not be filled with an American citizen if the employer were willing to pay the right price. The fact that the company in question "cannot fill" the position is merely a function of their desire to set an arbitrary price that they feel like paying. This is not the way of the market, and frankly it is a form of corporate decadence for them to go running to the government for a subsidy in the form of cheap foreign workers.
The emerging pattern in American society has a sinister resemblance to the decadent sheikdoms of the Gulf, which can't pump their own oil without massive foreign labor: Americans handle the financial and marketing side of things while we let foreigners do the engineering and the hard stuff. The national-security implications alone are chilling.
Furthermore, because we have this supply of foreign labor, we let our own technical education system slide, and we never liked math that much in the first place. Frankly, until American industry is served notice that it will have to supply its future technical needs from our own people, it has absolutely no incentive to care. Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich stated "The H-1b program "has become a major means of circumventing the costs of paying skilled American workers of the costs of training them." (Those who blanche politically at taking the word of a liberal like Reich should in fact rejoice at the sight of the opposition being hoisted on its own petard by one of its very few intellectually consistent members.)
H1-B helps promote age and other forms of discrimination by giving companies a ready supply of foreigners who don't have any uppity American ideas about their rights and who can be silenced by threatening to send them back where they came from. Because even companies that don't employ H1-B workers can threaten to do so, H1-B has a chilling effect on industry as a whole.
Though the H-1b has been sold as providing companies access to the "world's best and brightest", reality differs from the sales pitch. The law states the alien must have "a bachelors degree or equivalent". Hardly indicative of the world's best and brightest. Experience shows that the people imported are, in general terms, no better or no worse than domestic workers. Nobody objects to bringing in Nobel-calibre scientists and the like, but this is a tiny number of people, not 200,000 per year.
There are entire companies in America now where native-born Americans are not welcome. Some of them are even growing fat on defense contracts. H-1b visa holders are often "benched" when imported by a contract engineering house or "body shop". They will be brought in and benched until the contract firm has a job opening they can fill. Often they are not paid until they actually go to work at a client firm of the contract house. They may be provided a place to stay, and a small amount of spending money until they get on the payroll.
The final idiocy of the recent raising of the H1-B quota to 200,000 per year is that it was done just as we are almost certainly overdue for a recession. People tend to assume that all technology workers are rich dot-com entrepreneurs; in fact, 95% of them are ordinary middle-class Americans.
The Labor Department has nominal regulations on the books to protect American citizens, but these have so many loopholes as to be ineffective. For example, although Labor Dept. regulations require companies to pay at least 95% of the prevailing wage, companies are free to use biased data in establishing what this wage is. The survey data is always suspect because it is provided by the very companies who will benefit from the results. They spin the data by grouping employees into inappropriate categories, by selective reporting, and by outright dishonesty. Companies who do not use foreign labor are reluctant to answer the survey as it entails some cost and time which could be spent on more productive corporate endeavors. Furthermore, because H1-B workers depress wages, their prevailing wage tends to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. No one ever checks the results of the survey.
Industry likes to claim that it needs H1-B workers "to be competitive in the global economy." However, they can't get even Clinton's Labor Department, which has overseen this massive giveaway program, to buy their line. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General Final Report. Report Number: 06-96-002-03-321 Titled "The Department of Labor's Foreign Labor Certification Programs: The System Is Broken and Needs To Be Fixed" dated 1/24/97, states "In our opinion, not all types of jobs being filled by H-1B aliens necessarily represent jobs that would enhance U.S. employers' abilities to compete in a global economy."
Congress has repeatedly agreed, year by year, to expand the number of H1-B visas, always in exchange for provisions designed to protect American citizens. But this congressional intent is being frustrated.
Charles C. Masten, Inspector General, H-1B Labor Condition Application (LCA) program made the following comments. "Audit findings in a recently issued OIG report found that both programs fail to adequately protect American jobs or wages, as intended by Congress. The audit discovered that the Department's role amounts to little more than a paper shuffle for the PLC program and a "rubber stamping" for LCA program applications .The OIG also found that the labor market test, which is designed to ensure that there are no qualified U.S. workers available to fill the positions for which the application has been filed, is perfunctory at best Despite annual expenditures of approximately $50 million on DOL's foreign labor certification programs, the OIG found that DOL's role in the PLC and LCA programs did little to add value to the process of protecting U.S. workers' jobs and wages."
America's high-paying technical jobs are one of its most precious assets and they should not be squandered on foreigners. America has been the most competitive nation on earth for years without importing mass foreign technical labor. We are sending a message to our young people not to take technical careers, where they will be forced to compete against cheap foreigners, and making ourselves dependent on people with no intrinsic loyalty to us. The entire H1-B program should be abolished, and the few authentic geniuses out there should be brought in under other, existing programs."
You can e-mail Robert Locke at
lockerobert@hotmail.com.Email this article to a friend
E N D
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Employment_List, click below: | ||||
click here >>> | Employment_List | <<< click here | ||
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
I started out majoring in Computer Science and got as far as Programming in C but then Congress increased H-1B visas and I said goodbye to it. They're encouraging Americans NOT to take Computer Engineering with these policies, but try to get them to understand that. They could care less.
Actually, opposition to the H-1B visa program is a bipartisan thing, just as enacting it was bipartisan as well. H-1B is supported by Al Gore, George W. Bush, John McLame, Bill Clinton.
Many of the folks who oppose the H-1B is just as diverse -- Pat Buchanan, Ralph Nader, Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), Sen. Tim Hutchinson (R-AR), Sen Tom Harkin (D-IA), fmr Sen. Carol Mosely-Braun (D-IL), Sen. Carl LEvin (D-MI), and Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO).
Yep -- I am. I've not been laid off or anything or even fear being laid off (in fact, I'm actually up for a promotion). But it does bother me that our country is selling out to big businesses who are in search of cheap workers. I bring up this issue a lot because I'm just surprised at the lack of outrage at it. Our tax money is supporting a program that unemploys many Americans in the tech field.
Read another post I made today -- How to Tap India's Cheap IT Labor -- it's an article that appeared in CFO Magazine's website. To me, it's immoral that corporate America is handing Congress a lie about "this is not about lowering IT salaries" and then a financial trade mag pretty much admits that it is! It's insulting to the intelligence that there's a supposed shortage in the tech fields, layoffs are widespread in the tech fields, and yet companies lobby for MORE H-1B's in a recessionary period.
Congress is all about money and where they can get more. Trade groups (like ITAA, the tech industry's think tank in support of H-1B) are created using a 6-figure check from some CEO, while an employee group takes time and effort and what little money it can get.
Okay I will bite. Where is the data to support this? If there are hundreds of thousands of Americans with the proper skills and who are fluent in the computer languages that Microsoft and other H-1B hirers are looking for why isnt there rampant unemployment in the computer programming field?
If someone is fluent in Cobol and the company is looking for someone who is fluent in some other language, then the individual is unqualified for the position. Its just like showing up for interview to be a Japaneese interpreter and only know English and Spanish.
From the article it sounded as though the author expected the companies to hire and then train Americans in the computer language and how to do the task that they want completed. Sorry that wont wash. Potential employees are responsible for their own education. Why should a company teach a potential employee how to make a living so that guy can then go across the street and sell his new skill for even more money. No way. You want the job, you show up qualified for it.
This whole rant over H-1B is idiotic. If Microsoft and others cant bring in workers to do the work here, they can have it outsourced to firms in India and Singapore who would be happy to do it and they wont even pay US taxes. Its a global economy. Better get used to it. Get a skill someone is willing to pay more than minimum wage for or suffer the consequences.
Okay I will bite. Where is the data to support this? If there are hundreds of thousands of Americans with the proper skills and who are fluent in the computer languages that Microsoft and other H-1B hirers are looking for why isnt there rampant unemployment in the computer programming field?
If someone is fluent in Cobol and the company is looking for someone who is fluent in some other language, then the individual is unqualified for the position. Its just like showing up for interview to be a Japaneese interpreter and only know English and Spanish.
From the article it sounded as though the author expected the companies to hire and then train Americans in the computer language and how to do the task that they want completed. Sorry that wont wash. Potential employees are responsible for their own education. Why should a company teach a potential employee how to make a living so that guy can then go across the street and sell his new skill for even more money. No way. You want the job, you show up qualified for it.
This whole rant over H-1B is idiotic. If Microsoft and others cant bring in workers to do the work here, they can have it outsourced to firms in India and Singapore who would be happy to do it and they wont even pay US taxes. Its a global economy. Better get used to it. Get a skill someone is willing to pay more than minimum wage for or suffer the consequences.
Okay I will bite. Where is the data to support this? If there are hundreds of thousands of Americans with the proper skills and who are fluent in the computer languages that Microsoft and other H-1B hirers are looking for why isnt there rampant unemployment in the computer programming field?
If someone is fluent in Cobol and the company is looking for someone who is fluent in some other language, then the individual is unqualified for the position. Its just like showing up for interview to be a Japaneese interpreter and only know English and Spanish.
From the article it sounded as though the author expected the companies to hire and then train Americans in the computer language and how to do the task that they want completed. Sorry that wont wash. Potential employees are responsible for their own education. Why should a company teach a potential employee how to make a living so that guy can then go across the street and sell his new skill for even more money. No way. You want the job, you show up qualified for it.
This whole rant over H-1B is idiotic. If Microsoft and others cant bring in workers to do the work here, they can have it outsourced to firms in India and Singapore who would be happy to do it and they wont even pay US taxes. Its a global economy. Better get used to it. Get a skill someone is willing to pay more than minimum wage for or suffer the consequences.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.