And again, you are wrong if you think that if the press had police reports naming Chelsea Clinton in hand, or photos in hand of Chelsea Clinton falling down drunk, that they would not have run them. Trust me, I've been in the business for more than a quarter-century. It would have happened, regardless of any protestation from the White House. All the columnists, pundits, etc., would've fussed about it ... that's where Billy and Hilly would've called in their chips ... but as far as an everyday news decision by the working stiffs in the newsroom, that stuff would've been in the paper.
Which as I said in another response here, begs the question as to whether Chelsea had the good sense, either from her own intuition or because of drilling by her parents and their handlers, to know her stopping point and to never let herself completely go to the point of not realizing that photographers could lurk behind every pillar.
Chelsea comed her hair different last week. It was top story for three days. Talk about a mega-barf alert. It's unconcionable what the press does in this nation.
As for the current mess, pharmacists will not give anyone a pass who's presenting a fraudulent script. That is as it should be. But who calls the press in on these? Some vengeful democrat, that's who. Otherwise the press wouldn't have even known about it.
Well here it is, State of the Union day and the Bush's are being taken down a notch. That's all this is about in my opinion. This is a non-event. It has nothing to do with Uncle accept to detract from his talking points.