Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The President's Strange Heroes
Toogood Reports ^ | January 27, 2002 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 01/25/2002 4:26:25 AM PST by Starmaker

President George W. Bush has a propensity to lavish praise upon those who are the least deserving of it. This is very unfortunate, because it sends the message that people who break the rules and behave badly will still be honored. Furthermore, it tells people who try diligently to keep the rules and live honorably that there is no reward for doing so.

Just recently, Bush heaped acclaim and accolades upon Martin Luther King, Jr. Bush said King "brought much good into the world." He further said, "America is a better place because he (King) was here, and we will honor his name forever." Bush then announced that the Department of Education would establish the "Martin Luther King Jr. Scholars Program to promising students all across America." However, is King deserving of the accolades heaped upon him? The answer is "no."

King admitted to numerous adulterous affairs. Like Bill Clinton, King was a prolific philanderer. He spent the night before his murder with two women, and then fought with a third, knocking her across the bed. Obviously, the "non-violent" preacher did not practice what he preached!

Furthermore, a reluctant media was forced to acknowledge that King had plagiarized his Ph.D. thesis at Boston University. Can you imagine how the press (or even President Bush) would handle that story if the guilty party were anyone else?

As a minister of the Gospel, King was an apostate. Although raised in a fundamentalist home, he rejected the training of his youth and came to renounce the fundamental tenets of the Christian faith. He rejected Christ's deity, His virgin birth, and His physical resurrection. He also rejected the authority and inspiration of the Holy Bible.

It is also true that the F.B.I. has a dossier on King that is a mile long. King's coziness with communists and Marxists is undeniable. Martin Luther King, Jr. brought havoc and unrest to America as few men have ever done. One look at the plight of black families today reveals that his legacy is one of destruction not healing. Bush's praise of King is hollow and hypocritical. If Bush really wants to emulate King's legacy, heaven help us!

Another strange hero of the president is Senator Ted Kennedy. Bush recently said to Kennedy, "Mr. Senator, not only are you a good senator, you're a good man." Bush also said, "I've come to admire him (Kennedy)." These statements are so appalling it turns the stomach!

To call Kennedy "a good man" borders on blasphemy! Does anyone remember the name Mary Jo Kopechne? She was the young campaign worker who Kennedy, after a night of drunken revelry, left in the back seat of his Oldsmobile Eighty Eight to slowly drown as the car plunged to the bottom of an estuary near Chappaquiddick Island. Any other person would have been charged with some form of murder and put in prison. How can President Bush say he "admires" such a man? I doubt that the President would feel the same way if the girl at the bottom of that body of water had been one of his daughters.

Furthermore, Kennedy's record in the U.S. Senate reveals that he is one of the most liberal senators the country has ever had. His record on abortion, gay rights, gun control, big government spending, etc. reeks with liberalism and socialism. Again, how can Bush say that Kennedy is "all right"? How can he extend presidential praise upon such a man?

America has produced many genuine heroes; however, King and Kennedy are not among them, and the President is wrong to pretend that they are.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: D. Miles
bump
41 posted on 01/25/2002 10:00:12 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Christian B
When it comes down to it, you have to do business with Democrats.

Oh, I agree, if your motive is to keep elective office and power, than sell the American people down the river and get along with any slime. Who needs character, honesty, guts, or morals. These are not for political winners.

"The success of government depends entirely on the degree and length of time it can continue to defraud its victims, which are called citizens. A government can produce nothing and can do nothing, except to harm or threaten. All that a government is given credit for providing is confiscated or coerced from others."

"Government is the great fraud. The most successful politicians are those who have no illusions about the true nature of government and operate accordingly, that is, as consummate con artists."

And GW is a great one.

The Autonomist's Notebook

42 posted on 01/25/2002 11:37:33 AM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
It is the nature of government to enforce its authority with violence. That's one reason why big government is inherently tyrranical.

This notwithstanding, I thank God that George Bush is President.

43 posted on 01/25/2002 12:54:28 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
LOL.
47 posted on 01/25/2002 3:19:50 PM PST by OliverWendellDouglas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
This notwithstanding, I thank God that George Bush is President.

You are aware that the Bible agrees with my estimate of all politicians, that they are the basest of men, and God put them there.

Dan. 4:17 This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.

Hank

48 posted on 01/25/2002 4:31:14 PM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
No, Hank. I don't agree that all politicians are the basest of men, though many--maybe most--are. And I think George W. Bush, his father, Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Teddy Roosevelt were very fine people.
49 posted on 01/25/2002 5:07:20 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson