To: gnarledmaw
bttt
2 posted on
01/24/2002 6:33:25 AM PST by
Don Myers
To: bang_list
bang!
To: gnarledmaw
4 posted on
01/24/2002 6:37:56 AM PST by
backhoe
To: gnarledmaw
as they say in southern russia..."bumpski y'all"
6 posted on
01/24/2002 6:55:33 AM PST by
gorush
To: gnarledmaw
By their definition of explosive, wouldn't gasoline count?
7 posted on
01/24/2002 7:05:19 AM PST by
Aiden
To: gnarledmaw
As I have said, the anti-gunners know this has no chance of succeeding. I'll bet the legislators who introduced this bill are either not up for re-election or in a district full of DemoNAZIS who would vote for Satan himself if he ran.
The other anti-gunners will all come out and proclaim their opposition to this bill in an effort to make gun owners think that they are really not anti-gunners.
They will then water down the bill by banning only certain weapons such as .50 cal "sniper rifles". After all, who NEEDS a gun that can take out a tank (or a dirty politician) at more than a mile away?
The gun owners will lose a bit more and the NRA will proclaim that this was a victory and they actually support the new law.
To: gnarledmaw
With over 1,500 bills introduced each session... Uhhhh, anybody think this is part of the problem?
To: gnarledmaw
"The gun owners and sportsmen and women of Wisconsin owe our thanks to the Bold 15 who stood up for our rights and committed to help stop this legislation," said Zien. "I have never seen a bill lose ¾ of it's cosponsors for any reason, until today." 3/4 of the cosponsers took a hike? Heck, I want to thank those 15 as well . .
T L I
22 posted on
02/15/2004 9:24:00 PM PST by
TLI
(...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
To: gnarledmaw
23 posted on
06/30/2005 5:41:00 AM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson