Posted on 01/14/2002 3:41:37 AM PST by tberry
Performing a Historectomy on America
David C. Stolinsky
Monday, Jan. 14, 2002
First, let me make clear that I am not referring to a hysterectomy, or removal of the uterus, but a historectomy, or removal of our history.
Next, let me explain why this is especially critical for America. To do so, let me contrast America with France.
The area we now call France was settled by Celtic peoples called Gauls in prehistoric times, hundreds or perhaps thousands of years B.C. The Romans under Caesar invaded and spread Roman customs and law and the Latin language, on which French is based.
The last major addition was the invasion of the Franks, a Germanic tribe that settled northwestern France and gave the nation its name. This occurred roughly 1,500 years ago. That is, for a millennium and a half, approximately the same people have occupied roughly the same area.
When we talk about France and the French, we know very well what and whom we mean. Despite all the wars and other changes of the last 1,500 years, France remains France. But what of America?
A small strip of the Atlantic coast was settled by Europeans in the late 1500s and early 1600s. A large chunk of the central continent was added with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, and the Southwest was added in 1848 after the Mexican War. These huge areas were peopled by successive waves of immigrants from many lands, who largely displaced the Native Americans.
When we talk about America and Americans, we must specify what time we refer to, and which segment of the population we mean. Unlike older nations, America is a relatively recent invention. Its population shifted over time, and is still shifting because of continued immigration.
Unlike France and many other nations, America is an idea. To define America, one cannot merely refer to an ancient land with a predominantly stable population. No, to define America one must refer to the ideas and ideals on which it is based.
But are we trying to preserve these ideas and hand them down to the next generation? Or are we doing our best to eradicate these ideas from our collective memory? Are we attempting to induce national amnesia? Are we, in fact, performing a historectomy? That is, are we removing the basis of our nation?
When I went to grammar school a half-century ago, we saluted the flag every morning. We were taught patriotic songs for national holidays. And we enjoyed Christmas and Easter vacations, not winter and spring breaks. After all, the vast majority of Americans, and all of the founders, identified themselves as Christians.
In junior high, I was required to memorize the Gettysburg Address, the Preamble to the Constitution, and the first and fourth verses of "The Star-Spangled Banner." If you want to learn how a house is constructed, first study the foundation.
In high school, I was required to take American History and Civics, not merely "social studies." We learned about the great people and great events of our history, and (to a much lesser degree) some of the unhappy events. We learned how a bill becomes law, and what powers the president and the Supreme Court have.
But more than that, I loved movies. I saw "The Story of Alexander Graham Bell," inventor of the telephone. I saw "Sergeant York," the true story of how a pacifist farmer was convinced that violent evildoers had to be opposed by force, then went on to win the Medal of Honor. I saw "They Died With Their Boots On," a highly fictionalized account of General Custer, but at least I learned that he played a key role in the Civil War, which is more than today's kids know.
Later I saw "Boys' Town," the story of Father Flannagan's orphanage. And of course there was "The Fighting Sixty-Ninth," depicting Father Duffy's role in this New York unit's World War I exploits. So when I passed his statue in Times Square, I may have been the only one on the tour bus who knew who he was – not bad for a Jewish kid who grew up in San Francisco.
But, you see, I was brought up to be an American.
Then there were the John Ford films of the West, where the U.S. Army was depicted in a sympathetic (some might say overly sympathetic) light. I saw depictions of Abe Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson. I was being entertained at the movies, but I was also being exposed to my country's past.
Contrast my upbringing with what today's kids are exposed to:
Today's kids read history books and hear lectures that describe America's past as questionable at best, and evil or downright genocidal at worst.
Today's kids mumble a few of the words to the first verse of the National Anthem at sports events. Forget about the fourth verse, the one that mentions (gasp!) God.
Today's kids are taught that the founders were deists, not really Christians – that is, if religion is allowed to be mentioned at all.
Today's kids are lucky to place the Revolution or the Civil War in the right century, much less the right decade.
Today's kids identify Grant as the man on the $50 bill, not the man who led the Union to victory and thereby ended slavery.
Today's kids will not find Adm. Ernest King, our chief of naval operations in World War II, in the Encyclopedia Britannica. They will find jazz guitarist B.B. King. One doesn't need an encyclopedia for living musicians; one needs it to learn about heroes of the past who bequeathed us our freedom. But Adm. King has been excised, along with uncounted other significant figures of our past.
Today's kid's see movies depicting our leaders as scheming warmongers or even assassins (remember Oliver Stone's "JFK"?) and our military as sadistic morons and oppressors.
Today's kids see clergy depicted as idiots or molesters, if they see them at all, and religion shown as an oppressive and destructive force, if it is referred to in any way.
Today's kids, and even law students, are taught that the Constitution is a "living document." (Do you give it mouth-to-page respiration if it stops breathing?) That is, it has no fixed meaning, and means whatever a judge says it means today. In effect, kids are taught that we have no
Constitution. In short, the last generation of Americans has been taught little of the foundations of their country. And what they were taught was often negative. What they saw in movies only served to strengthen this negative impression.
No wonder they view America with ambivalence at best, and with open hostility at worst. Is John Walker an aberration, or just the tip of the iceberg? Only time will tell.
If you want to destroy a house, undermine the foundation. If you want to destroy a nation, do the same. If you want to debase people who are defined by ideas, destroy the ideas. If you want to bring down a society that is sustained by its history, perform a historectomy. But be aware that this can be a dangerous operation from which the patient may not recover.
Until he corrects his own misperceptions of the ideals on which the US was founded, he doesn't really know what to moan about.
The union/government near monopoly control of education should be ended with the privatization of schools with a type of GI Bill for children. It is the civil rights issue of this Century. COMPETITION WILL INSURE FREEDOM.
So would I. I had my last U.S. History class at a public high school about 5 years ago. I would consider it to be an accurate representation of U.S. history, without a lot of the politically correct junk that people complain about. (Of course, by now I've had plenty of time to forget parts of it, but that's a completely different issue.)
4th (and 8th) grade were a long time ago.
I agree with your 'bit-players' comment. We're seeing that more and more - I specifially had the misfortune of seeing it at the Smithsonian museum of American History recently. Was expecting stuff on the Revolution, rise of America, etc and got displays on Pop culture, dresses worn by former first ladies, and an exhibit on global warming. I was so disgusted that I left. How a museum can give equal billing to the original Star Spangled Banner AND a 'phaser' from Star Trek boggles my imagination.
I call it 'Gumping' history (with apologies to Forrest). Dumb it down, and populate it with people whose only claim to fame was that they were there when something happened.
This is what the Frankfort School is all about---Cultural Marxism.
Good post. Thanks.
On a side note, did anyone here actually learn anything about Africa outside of Egypt and the requisite paragraph on the Boer War before they got to college? I didn't know jack about Africa until I took an African history & geography course in my undergrad years.
I believe you. Been there and done that.
I don't know if you use NUMBERS USA or not but if you don't, go there and send free FAX's to Washington. Every little bit helps!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.