Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

82 Year Old Widow has Home Seized for Son's sins.
Associated Press | 1-11-02 | Associated Press

Posted on 01/11/2002 10:44:30 PM PST by LloydofDSS

Jan 11, 2002 Widow's Home Seized After Son's Arrest for Drug Possession The Associated Press ATHENS, Ga. (AP) - Police have seized the house of an 82-year-old widow because they say she knew her son dealt drugs there and did nothing to stop him. Fannie Gresham's small home was seized Thursday under a state law allowing authorities to confiscate property linked to the illegal drug trade. Authorities also arrested her 50-year-old son, Tommie "Top Dollar" Gresham, on a drug charge after he allegedly dropped several rocks of crack cocaine and fled. Police records show 29 incidents of drug activity at the address since 1992 and authorities say drug dealers were caught numerous times fetching drugs from the house for street sales. Based on that, and police claims that the elder, widowed Gresham was helping her son's alleged operation, Superior Court Judge Stephen Boswell issued a court order in December allowing the seizure. Boswell gave Fannie Gresham 14 days to move her belongings. Her attorney, Jim Smith, likened the seizure to the widespread illegal taking of property and land from blacks that he says tarnishes America's past. "They have never seized any drugs in this house. This lady is not accused of a single thing," he said. Police predicted more such seizures as they crack down on the drug trade in the city's troubled neighborhoods. A hearing on the seizure has been scheduled in February.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-174 next last
To: LloydofDSS;Johnny_Apollo
OK, Its just me stirring the pot! Me & sick $.01 of Humor..I just couldnt resist.
SPeaking of 15 years ago in Florida, There was a few of these making the rounds in the Key West area.

From the 4th ammendment to "Zero Tollerance" to property confication without due process, it is definatly a tangled web. Where will it end...INDEED.

Delta 21

21 posted on 01/12/2002 1:49:39 AM PST by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
Well - it looks like its back to work for ole granny!

GRANNY EARNING $ FOR A NEW HOUSE

22 posted on 01/12/2002 2:03:50 AM PST by stlrocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stlrocket
I'll give her a job as a live-in housekeeper.

I need someone to move my BoFlex and free weights up into the attic.

23 posted on 01/12/2002 2:16:51 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
"They have never seized any drugs in this house. This lady is not accused of a single thing,"

This ought to seriously bother you. Why doesn't it?

24 posted on 01/12/2002 2:21:13 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I'm also against drugs, I don't think we should punish those who aren't guilty though.Sorry, but this is a natural by product of the WOD's. You can't have it both ways. You are either going to allow this to continue, and get worse, or put a stop to it. I know alot of folks think every issue has a middle of the road, grey areas and the like, but it's just not the case. When you give someone the authority to take an inch they'll have a mile under their jackboots before you know it. Blackbird.
25 posted on 01/12/2002 2:38:25 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
If she convinces the court, she gets her property back.Yeah right, it happens all the time. Blackbird.
26 posted on 01/12/2002 2:40:36 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
If she convinces the court, she gets her property back.I forgot to add, guilty till proven innocent. Blackbird.
27 posted on 01/12/2002 2:42:57 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Thats good it shows your rational. But why do you think taxpayer money should be wasted stopping people from ingesting whatever they want into their bodies

#1.. Because the average age when a kid gets hooked is 12. Is a 12 year old able to make rational decisions that will drive the restof their lives? Is your 12 year old? Were you so qualified at 12?

#2 Because after the addict crashes their body, they want the taxpayers to fund their health care for the rest of their lives. Isn't it better to stop the problem in the first place?

28 posted on 01/12/2002 2:57:33 AM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: LloydofDSS
How do they expect an 82 year old woman to stop her 50 year old son from dealing drugs?

Let's see: She can't

I guess all she can do it put encouraging words on little post-it notes all over his room. ;-)

These confiscation laws are really un-American! They can't convict the guy of anything so they go after his mother!

30 posted on 01/12/2002 3:17:14 AM PST by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: riley1992
"They have never seized any drugs in this house. This lady is not accused of a single thing,"

This ought to seriously bother you. Why doesn't it?

That is not the question I addressed. I addressed the claim that the old and weak are totally helpless to prevent crime committed by the young and strong.

In a primitive society, that claim may be true. In a civilized society, a 85 year old lady can pick up the phone, call the Police and, depending on the situation, can initiate the mobilization of a SWAT team.

32 posted on 01/12/2002 3:22:28 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LloydofDSS
Her attorney, Jim Smith, likened the seizure to the widespread illegal taking of property and land from blacks that he says tarnishes America's past.

The first thing you want to do, in a case like this, is pull out the race card and hold it up for everyone to see.

33 posted on 01/12/2002 3:22:54 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LloydofDSS
Isnt the Drug War great?

How much longer??? before you DRUG WAR FANATICS!! win this war?

so my taxes can be reduced, so I can get back my freedoms, so we have room for violent felons in prison, and so I can get the government to stop snooping on me??

(Things were so much simpler back when all drugs were legal, back when there was no drug-related crime, and the mafia was actually poor)

34 posted on 01/12/2002 3:24:12 AM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Why didn't she notify the cops on this??
35 posted on 01/12/2002 3:26:08 AM PST by Disgusted in Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
When was the last time you heard of a multimillionaire put on trial for drug trafficking?

Generally, drug laws are enforced against the middle class, and the poor. This is especially true of the drug "lifer" laws.

Does anyone really think that George Washington(a daily opium user), or Thomas Jefferson(who grew acres of marijuanna), would be sentenced to life in prison if we caught them today?

Does everyone???? here really think/believe that we would have been better off if George Washington and Tom Jefferson had spent all of their lives in prison, and lost their homes, instead of starting the United States and becoming presidents?

36 posted on 01/12/2002 3:31:32 AM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I know that this may go over your heads, but don't you think that some of the law abiding neigbors may be happy with getting a crack house out of their neighborhood. Of course the AP didn't interview any of her neighbors.

They wrote the article to gin up the ACLU/Libertarian crowd.

37 posted on 01/12/2002 3:31:36 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
If Georgia law allows for an innocent owner defense, then this lady will have the privilege of trying to prove that she didn't/couldn't know about the illegal activity. If she convinces the court, she gets her property back.

That is completely unacceptable. We have a little thing in our constitution called "innocent until proven guilty." She is not supposed to have to prove her innocence. The state has to prove her guilt, and they are only supposed to take her home after doing so (due process). Of course, first they're supposed to actually charge her with something, then they're supposed to prove it.

Let me repeat: In this country we do not require people to prove their innocence. We require the state to prove their guilt.
38 posted on 01/12/2002 3:33:04 AM PST by sonjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Pick up the phone, call the Police and report the crime.

You are kidding aren't you. I once actually tried that long long ago. Fortunately a very kind and understanding police officer very politely informed me what was about to happen to ME if I actually filed that report. This little old lady is just "lucky" she hasn't been hauled off Elian style by some jack-booted thugs.

39 posted on 01/12/2002 3:33:39 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LloydofDSS
Police records show 29 incidents of drug activity at the address since 1992 and authorities say drug dealers were caught numerous times fetching drugs from the house for street sales.

While I am no WOD crusader and I feel that convictionless seizures are an abomination of justice, it should be mentioned that this woman had many chances to do something about her son's behavior.

You can bet that if this was a white family in the suburbs who's kid was busted selling pot out of the house, that home would have been seized after incident numero uno.

40 posted on 01/12/2002 3:39:53 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson