Lieberman setting up the story to run over the weekend?
1 posted on
01/11/2002 10:39:11 AM PST by
umbra
To: umbra
"51 pickup?"
2 posted on
01/11/2002 10:41:50 AM PST by
Tallguy
To: umbra
I wonder how this is going to work out -- 51 subpoenas are sent out by an institution that doesn't have the moral authority to demand truthful testimony from anyone.
To: umbra
Fine. As Commerce Committee chairman, he certainly has the right. Again, what does this have to do with Bush?
To: umbra
List should be easy...go to Federal Inside Trader Form 144 and take a look at all the instant multi-millionaires from March - October 2001.....and there are ~ 51+ rich boys & girls.
5 posted on
01/11/2002 10:44:46 AM PST by
TRY ONE
To: umbra
There's nothing to hide! Stocks go up and stocks go down. Shareholders have to expect some risk. If they hold onto their stock, maybe it will go back up again, just in time for the November elections!
To: umbra
From
Enron's "who we are" section of their website:
It's difficult to define Enron in a sentence, but the closest we come is this: we make commodity markets so that we can deliver physical commodities to our customers at a predictable price. It's difficult, too, to talk about Enron without using the word "innovative." Most of the things we do have never been done before.
I'll wager to say that most of the things they do will never be done again, either ;)
7 posted on
01/11/2002 10:45:45 AM PST by
Sender
To: umbra
Are these 51 subpoenas going to the the 51 Democrat Senator's who received campaign money from Enron? Somehow I doubt it.
8 posted on
01/11/2002 10:45:57 AM PST by
ao98
To: umbra
Lieberman setting up the story to run over the weekend? Maybe the story should be that Lieberman's biggest campaign contributor is Enron's larget unsecured creditor. Citigroup, which has been Lieberman's top contributor since 1998, is on the hook for $3 billion thanks to unsecured loans to Enron.
9 posted on
01/11/2002 10:46:34 AM PST by
Pete
To: umbra
11 posted on
01/11/2002 10:49:01 AM PST by
angkor
To: umbra
Isn't it amazing how speedy and efficient those DemocRATS can become when the target isn't their own corrupt president!
To: umbra
setting up the story to run over the weekend? I suspect the story will run FAR longer than that.
Gives the media a chance to soft-pedal the "WAR ON TERROR" report to a mere sidebar now that the First of the gabillion dollar checks have been cashed.
14 posted on
01/11/2002 10:52:36 AM PST by
Askel5
To: umbra
Two thoughts:
1. If any of our people actually did anything wrong, then they should answer for it. Being a republican doesn't earn you a "Get out of jail free" card with me.
2. I will support the principal of innocent until proven guilty, and therefore, any on our side accused, until the cows come home. I'll not abide low-life slander, innuendo campaigns run throught the liberal media.
16 posted on
01/11/2002 10:55:05 AM PST by
xzins
To: umbra
seeking documents back to 1991.Hmmm. Right through the Clinton Administration? Well...White house coffees, Indonesian tech sales...who knows what other good democrat connections we'll hear about.
BTW...The Clinton/Lewinski full report is due to come out today.
To: umbra
Maybe they can subpoena each other, then go after the House:
Jean Carnahan (D-Mo) $1,000
Robert G. Torricelli (D-NJ) $1,000
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) $3,000
Pete V. Domenici (R-NM) $12,000
Thad Cochran (R-Miss) $3,000
Robert F. Bennett (R-Utah) $8,053
Jim Bunning (R-Ky) $769
Ken Bentsen (D-Texas) $42,750
Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) $38,000
Martin Frost (D-Texas) $24,250
Charles W. Stenholm (D-Texas) $14,439
Chet Edwards (D-Texas) $10,000
John D. Dingell (D-Mich) $9,000
Edward J. Markey (D-Mass) $8,500
20 posted on
01/11/2002 11:00:51 AM PST by
angkor
To: umbra
Let's be sure they subpoena Clinton and Gore so we can also fully investigate how Enron introduced their Administration to the Chinese. Most likely Enron got a lot more return favors from Clinton and Gore than they ever got from George W.
39 posted on
01/11/2002 12:10:36 PM PST by
jrlc
To: umbra
Loserman can't shut his mouth over in South Asia -- rebuked by Pakistan over his comments regarding the upcoming speech. Guess he had his mind on domestic politics while he was grandstanding on taxpayer $ in Kabul.
40 posted on
01/11/2002 12:11:58 PM PST by
jrlc
To: umbra
To bad they can't subpoena Ron Brown. Although his body still has a story to tell. Exhume and autopsy it.
To: umbra
I certainly hope that Clinton's Chief of Staff MacLarty & Lanny davis are among those called.......:)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson