Posted on 01/11/2002 8:52:14 AM PST by ml/nj
Today in the WSJ, Karen Elliot House reviews a new book from Bernard Lewis entitled What Went Wrong. She begins this way:
How has it come to pass that a civilization that for centuries led the world in science, medicine, and the arts ...Does anyone know what contribution the Islamic world made to science besides giving us our number system (admittedly a biggie) and naming a bunch of stars (less big)? Algebra may have Arabic roots linguistically, but I cannot think of a single concept or theorem that we credit to the Arabs. The Greeks are all over geometry. The Arabs supposedly preserved this and passed it along, but did they contribute? I don't know. I'm asking.
Ditto for medicine. What did they do? (Stop the bleeding when they chopped off someones hand?)
And if House just said "Art," maybe, but Arts? The Islamic architecture should certainly be considered "leading," but is there any philosophy or literature that anyone pays attention to along the lines of Maimonades or Aquinas?
ML/NJ
"I used to be somebody............now I'm just annoying and a pain in the ass to all around me."
In all fairness, 1200 years ago they did collect and preserve all of the useful knowledge of the known world, which later was passed on to the West. Their contributions of original concepts, however, was nil.
Sometime around the 15th century, aliens from another planet took away all the original muslims and replaced them with genetically engineered pigs.
So for the last 700 years their positive contribution in any useful field is pretty much zero.
What is the source of all these assertions?
Advances. Algebra (Al-Gebra), early theory of medicine and sanitation, dissemination of the use of suturing (don't recall if it was original to them or not), changes in arch style that led to the flying buttress, improved steels, preservation of the works of the early philosophers, dissemination of "Arabic" numbering, advances in geometry and number theory, advances in stellar navigation, advances in ship and sail design...
One of the things about Islam is that it calls for a pilgrimage to Mecca to be made at least once in each person's life. And the Koran calls for learning as an absolute positive. The combination, up until the 14th-16th century or so, meant that Islam was a _major_ positive force for learning and change. Scholars were treated the way that we treat rock stars and travelled throughout the Dar Al Islam with impugnity. Groups would be gathered by Kaliphs and think and expound and develop and invent. In its heyday, Islam was a center of learning and culture. However, right at its peak there was a philosophical split between the followers of Averroes, who believed that the Koran could only be truly understood by the literate, and for all others it had to be interpreted, and the Fundamentalists who believed that each statement had to be obeyed in a Fundamental way.
Guess who won?
What's this we stuff? ....
Here at FR most are treated with derision. Does anyone care what any "rock star" has to say about anything?
Scholars are routinely quoted here to support one point or another.
And as for the way Muslims regarded scholars, I asked sometime back if anyone knew the Mulsim equivalent to Maimonades or Aquinas. I don't think I got an answer. I think the bottom line is that the Muslim World has little use for anyone whose learning extends beyond the boundaries of the Koran and the Hadiths. That is not "respect for scholars" in my book.
ML/NJ
But the way they describe it, it was from the 700's well into 1800's. Pretty much includes the dark ages, you might say they caused it.
How much is "many,many" ? I know a 'couple' is 2, a 'few' is more than 2, and 'many' is maybe 10, "many, many" may then be 20. I have yet to hear of a 'few' accomplishments for a culture that sat on time for 1400 years and still going down hill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.