Skip to comments.
W's Arab Bodyguard Hires Att'y
New York Daily News ^
| 1/03/02
| KENNETH R. BAZINET
Posted on 01/03/2002 1:10:30 AM PST by kattracks
WASHINGTON
An Arab-American Secret Service agent assigned to protect President Bush has hired an attorney after being kicked off a commercial flight on Christmas Day, officials said yesterday.
The agent, whose name is being withheld for security reasons, was questioned about his identity before being barred from the American Airlines flight.
Civil rights attorney Christy Lopez of the Washington law firm Relman & Associates has taken the case, said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
The council has filed a civil rights complaint alleging the pilot ordered the armed agent off the plane only because he was an Arab-American.
Bush said last week that he would be "madder than heck" if his bodyguard was booted from the flight because of his ethnicity.
The American-Islamic group announced yesterday that a passenger who was sitting next to the agent on American Airlines Flight 363 has come forward alleging the agent was "kicked off the plane because of his race."
Secret Service spokesman Jim Mackin declined to comment.
American Airlines claims the pilot ordered the agent off the flight to Dallas-Fort Worth because his paperwork contained "inconsistencies."
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-242 next last
To: one_particular_harbour
Why are you assuming it was blatant and naked racism?
If you believe the pilot, he was completely justified in booting this man off the plane.
I believe the pilot.
To: FloridaCracker
Federal paperwork is always difficult to fill out and it is understandable that someone might not comply with all the requirements.I wasn't necessarily talking about filling in the appropriate blanks. I was mainly referring to his actual compliance with the Secret Service policy, American Airlines policy, and the FAA regulations Sections 108.11 and 108.21 of 14 CFR 108, Airplane Operator Security.
As you questioned, did his duties actually require him to carry? The FAA has explicit rules about this, and the Secret Service must also file its own explicit policy with American Airlines. Did the agent's written rationale (presumably requested in the forms he was asked to complete) actually comply with all of those policies?
102
posted on
01/03/2002 7:03:55 AM PST
by
angkor
To: Quix
. . . but would we have tolerated too easily Japanese or German Secret Service agents in WWII?Ask Indira Ghandi about the benefits and safety of using bodyguards from an ethnic group that is your declared enemy.
Oops. You can't. She's dead.
To: MissAmericanPie
It doesn't matter if he's Islamic, or Christian or Jewish -- he went to the Council on American Islamic Relations with his beef -- that says volumes about his lack of integrity and judgement. This is the same organization whose first response to 9/11 was to e-mail a discrimination complaint form to its members.
To: cynicom
Now that the guy has gone and gotten lawyered up, President Bush might have different take on all this.
To: kattracks
He's in the money ... his hiring an attorney is about filing suit against AA for an "undisclosed" sum ... that is what this is about.
Otherwise, if money is not what this is about the agent making these claims would have been better served by handling this privately and letting the bigger more horrible outcome for AA be to face President Bush and his anger over what happened.
106
posted on
01/03/2002 7:08:17 AM PST
by
zeaal
To: kattracks
EXACTLY WHO YOU DO NOT WANT FOR A SECRET SERVICE AGENT!!!
THIS IS BS!!!!
107
posted on
01/03/2002 7:10:05 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: MissAmericanPie
Have they found out he is Islamic?
I don't care what religion, color, weight, smoker, abortion position, etc. He behaved like a jerk. The pilot rules that plane and his word is law. He should be apologizing for any embarrasement his action caused the President and the Secret Service in a letter of resignation, not looking for a fast buck. Remember the S.S. letting the "reporter" walk up to the President at Boca? Doesn't look like they have improved much since them. They need to get their act together "big time". The biggest insult is to the true professionals that are ready to take a bullet. This guy isn't even ready to take an inconvenience.
To: Flyer
Yeah, after losing a few multi-million dollar lawsuits the pilots will stop all this nonsense of trying to make their planes safe. Of course, they'd have to START first.
109
posted on
01/03/2002 7:19:57 AM PST
by
Sloth
To: cricket
Bottom line, given the above, and the times; think 'wisdom' dictates that GW should not have an Islamic body guard, period. Why not? I mean, Indian Prime Minister Indira Ghandi kept her Sikh personal guard during all of the uprisings at Amritsar for political reasons. She didn't want to make it appear that she was singling out loyal Sikhs for political retribution or that she questioned the loyalty of her long-time ceremonial guard. That all worked out well, didn't it?
(Historical note: Indira Ghandi was killed by her ceremonial Sikh guard during a period of turmoil over uprisings in the Sikh temple as Amritsar)
To: Gadsden1st
If this creep behaved like an arrogant jerk then I would have been one of the passengers requesting his sorry butt be put off the plane. There is no excuse for racism, but there is a LOT of excuse for using common sense. Methinks someone had EARLY RETIREMENT in mind. God BLESS the PILOT!
To: kattracks
Unless I'm reading this wrong, Hooper da Pooper(TM) has one degree of separation from the oval office. Yikes!
112
posted on
01/03/2002 7:31:13 AM PST
by
Don Joe
To: cricket
"Bottom line, given the above, and the times; think 'wisdom' dictates that GW should not have an Islamic body guard, period." You'd think it would be a no-brainer, sheesh!
113
posted on
01/03/2002 7:35:42 AM PST
by
Don Joe
To: GopherIt
And every damn 'i' better have a dot on it.I would hesitate flying with you. If you rely on dotted 'i's in bad ineffective law as a cure all, you would be the primary problem.
114
posted on
01/03/2002 7:36:31 AM PST
by
duckln
To: lonestar
I'm with the pilot on this BIG TIME.
115
posted on
01/03/2002 7:38:17 AM PST
by
Unicorn
Comment #116 Removed by Moderator
To: Cachelot
"If it is an islamic individual, we need to think about what this means. It may mean that what we're looking at is an action initiated for the specific purpose of dulling down security. It may not be just this indivisual acting alone. Keep an eye on what and who comes out of the woodwork to support him." Am I the only one who is reminded by this of Indira Ghandi her Sikh bodyguards? Something smells wrong here. I hope the Secret Service agents that work around this guy are keeping their eye on him, and I hope GW's indignation is for public consumption only.
117
posted on
01/03/2002 7:41:05 AM PST
by
Don Joe
To: Gadsden1st
"Remember the S.S. letting the "reporter" walk up to the President at Boca?" .......the ss is throughly clintontized. they are all clintonistas and are working only to further the goals of clintonism.
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Bingo. If there wasn't an air of "fishyness" about the guy, they would have called the Secret Service to verify who he was, and on top of that, why didn't just say "fine, put my gun in baggage," and board like all the other passengers?
119
posted on
01/03/2002 7:43:50 AM PST
by
Don Joe
To: FR_addict
I'm with the pilot too big time.
120
posted on
01/03/2002 7:45:18 AM PST
by
Unicorn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-242 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson