Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

W's Arab Bodyguard Hires Att'y
New York Daily News ^ | 1/03/02 | KENNETH R. BAZINET

Posted on 01/03/2002 1:10:30 AM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON
An Arab-American Secret Service agent assigned to protect President Bush has hired an attorney after being kicked off a commercial flight on Christmas Day, officials said yesterday.

The agent, whose name is being withheld for security reasons, was questioned about his identity before being barred from the American Airlines flight.

Civil rights attorney Christy Lopez of the Washington law firm Relman & Associates has taken the case, said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

The council has filed a civil rights complaint alleging the pilot ordered the armed agent off the plane only because he was an Arab-American.

Bush said last week that he would be "madder than heck" if his bodyguard was booted from the flight because of his ethnicity.

The American-Islamic group announced yesterday that a passenger who was sitting next to the agent on American Airlines Flight 363 has come forward alleging the agent was "kicked off the plane because of his race."

Secret Service spokesman Jim Mackin declined to comment.

American Airlines claims the pilot ordered the agent off the flight to Dallas-Fort Worth because his paperwork contained "inconsistencies."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-242 next last
To: one_particular_harbour
Why are you assuming it was blatant and naked racism?

If you believe the pilot, he was completely justified in booting this man off the plane.

I believe the pilot.

101 posted on 01/03/2002 6:59:48 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FloridaCracker
Federal paperwork is always difficult to fill out and it is understandable that someone might not comply with all the requirements.

I wasn't necessarily talking about filling in the appropriate blanks. I was mainly referring to his actual compliance with the Secret Service policy, American Airlines policy, and the FAA regulations Sections 108.11 and 108.21 of 14 CFR 108, Airplane Operator Security.

As you questioned, did his duties actually require him to carry? The FAA has explicit rules about this, and the Secret Service must also file its own explicit policy with American Airlines. Did the agent's written rationale (presumably requested in the forms he was asked to complete) actually comply with all of those policies?

102 posted on 01/03/2002 7:03:55 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Quix
. . . but would we have tolerated too easily Japanese or German Secret Service agents in WWII?

Ask Indira Ghandi about the benefits and safety of using bodyguards from an ethnic group that is your declared enemy.

Oops. You can't. She's dead.

103 posted on 01/03/2002 7:06:58 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
It doesn't matter if he's Islamic, or Christian or Jewish -- he went to the Council on American Islamic Relations with his beef -- that says volumes about his lack of integrity and judgement. This is the same organization whose first response to 9/11 was to e-mail a discrimination complaint form to its members.
104 posted on 01/03/2002 7:07:41 AM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Now that the guy has gone and gotten lawyered up, President Bush might have different take on all this.
105 posted on 01/03/2002 7:07:44 AM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
He's in the money ... his hiring an attorney is about filing suit against AA for an "undisclosed" sum ... that is what this is about.

Otherwise, if money is not what this is about the agent making these claims would have been better served by handling this privately and letting the bigger more horrible outcome for AA be to face President Bush and his anger over what happened.

106 posted on 01/03/2002 7:08:17 AM PST by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
EXACTLY WHO YOU DO NOT WANT FOR A SECRET SERVICE AGENT!!!

THIS IS BS!!!!

107 posted on 01/03/2002 7:10:05 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Have they found out he is Islamic?


I don't care what religion, color, weight, smoker, abortion position, etc. He behaved like a jerk. The pilot rules that plane and his word is law. He should be apologizing for any embarrasement his action caused the President and the Secret Service in a letter of resignation, not looking for a fast buck. Remember the S.S. letting the "reporter" walk up to the President at Boca? Doesn't look like they have improved much since them. They need to get their act together "big time". The biggest insult is to the true professionals that are ready to take a bullet. This guy isn't even ready to take an inconvenience.

108 posted on 01/03/2002 7:14:37 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
Yeah, after losing a few multi-million dollar lawsuits the pilots will stop all this nonsense of trying to make their planes safe.

Of course, they'd have to START first.

109 posted on 01/03/2002 7:19:57 AM PST by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: cricket
Bottom line, given the above, and the times; think 'wisdom' dictates that GW should not have an Islamic body guard, period.

Why not? I mean, Indian Prime Minister Indira Ghandi kept her Sikh personal guard during all of the uprisings at Amritsar for political reasons. She didn't want to make it appear that she was singling out loyal Sikhs for political retribution or that she questioned the loyalty of her long-time ceremonial guard. That all worked out well, didn't it?

(Historical note: Indira Ghandi was killed by her ceremonial Sikh guard during a period of turmoil over uprisings in the Sikh temple as Amritsar)

110 posted on 01/03/2002 7:26:42 AM PST by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
If this creep behaved like an arrogant jerk then I would have been one of the passengers requesting his sorry butt be put off the plane. There is no excuse for racism, but there is a LOT of excuse for using common sense. Methinks someone had EARLY RETIREMENT in mind. God BLESS the PILOT!
111 posted on 01/03/2002 7:26:53 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Unless I'm reading this wrong, Hooper da Pooper(TM) has one degree of separation from the oval office. Yikes!
112 posted on 01/03/2002 7:31:13 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
"Bottom line, given the above, and the times; think 'wisdom' dictates that GW should not have an Islamic body guard, period."

You'd think it would be a no-brainer, sheesh!

113 posted on 01/03/2002 7:35:42 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GopherIt
And every damn 'i' better have a dot on it.

I would hesitate flying with you. If you rely on dotted 'i's in bad ineffective law as a cure all, you would be the primary problem.

114 posted on 01/03/2002 7:36:31 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
I'm with the pilot on this BIG TIME.
115 posted on 01/03/2002 7:38:17 AM PST by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: Cachelot
"If it is an islamic individual, we need to think about what this means. It may mean that what we're looking at is an action initiated for the specific purpose of dulling down security. It may not be just this indivisual acting alone. Keep an eye on what and who comes out of the woodwork to support him."

Am I the only one who is reminded by this of Indira Ghandi her Sikh bodyguards? Something smells wrong here. I hope the Secret Service agents that work around this guy are keeping their eye on him, and I hope GW's indignation is for public consumption only.

117 posted on 01/03/2002 7:41:05 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
"Remember the S.S. letting the "reporter" walk up to the President at Boca?" .......the ss is throughly clintontized. they are all clintonistas and are working only to further the goals of clintonism.
118 posted on 01/03/2002 7:42:10 AM PST by Rustynailww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Bingo. If there wasn't an air of "fishyness" about the guy, they would have called the Secret Service to verify who he was, and on top of that, why didn't just say "fine, put my gun in baggage," and board like all the other passengers?
119 posted on 01/03/2002 7:43:50 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
I'm with the pilot too big time.
120 posted on 01/03/2002 7:45:18 AM PST by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson