Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teachers in New Jersey now required to emphasize abstinence in sex ed courses
AP | 1/2/02

Posted on 01/02/2002 2:20:56 PM PST by Native American Female Vet

Teachers now required to emphasize abstinence in sex ed courses

By Associated Press, 1/2/2002 17:56

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) Sex educators in New Jersey must now stress abstinence as the best way to avoid pregnancy or AIDS.

Acting Gov. Donald T. DiFrancesco signed a bill Wednesday that orders any one who promotes sex education to make sure abstinence is listed as the only certain method to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.

The new law covers classroom lectures and all materials including pamphlets.

''Any instruction concerning the use of contraceptives, such as condoms, must include information on their failure rates for preventing pregnancy, HIV infection, and other sexually transmitted diseases in actual use among adolescent populations,'' the law reads.

School boards in the state must also rewrite local plans for teaching sex education to include ''reasons, skills, and strategies for remaining or becoming abstinent from sexual activity,'' according to the measure.

Opponents say the new law will hurt children by taking valuable classroom time away from subjects such as contraception.

Supporters contend that students must be presented with all information, including details about abstinence.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/02/2002 2:20:57 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
At least there is some good news out there!
2 posted on 01/02/2002 2:24:07 PM PST by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
How is this supposed to keep high schoolers from having sex?
3 posted on 01/02/2002 2:27:20 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Why do public schols have sex ed at all?
4 posted on 01/02/2002 2:28:59 PM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand
It sounds good, but I wonder if it means they will now be giving 3 minutes to abstinence instead of a passing mention.
5 posted on 01/02/2002 2:29:27 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Unless teachers mention abstinence in these courses, students don't even think abstinence is an option. But, I am really surprised to hear this about New Jersey -- is this governor a Dem or in the GOP?
6 posted on 01/02/2002 2:30:06 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doodad
Ooops. See-- more basics like education.
7 posted on 01/02/2002 2:30:22 PM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
Just think of it as a product liability requirement put into the condom promotion curriculum.
8 posted on 01/02/2002 2:32:58 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
How is this supposed to keep high schoolers from having sex?

By giving them better information so they make better choices. When teachers give them incomplete and misleading information that encourages them to go ahead and start having sex (or keep on having sex) rather than informing them of the risks of sex even with contraceptives, then students are MORE likely to engage in sexual activities than when they are informed about abstinence and the dangers of sex even with "protection". When students are given better information about abstinence and the risks with condoms and other contraceptive devices, then students are MORE likely to abstain than when they are fed only the Planned Parenthood propaganda.

If the schools are going to assume the power to "teach" students about sex and birth control, then at the very least they should be honest enough to teach the kids that it is in their best interest to wait until they are older (preferrably until marriage) to engage in sex and inform them of the reasons why.

9 posted on 01/02/2002 2:41:44 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Yikes!!!
Just when you last saw New Jersey swirling down the liberal toilet, out pops a hand to clutch desperately at the rim of the bowl! It's like a horror movie!

I wouldn't get too excited, though. The teachers unions there still own and control New Jersey. The place is gone for good, and this latest "bill" is just a meaningless con-job. The teachers will simply ignore the law.

10 posted on 01/02/2002 2:53:31 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Opponents say the new law will hurt children by taking valuable classroom time away from subjects such as contraception.

Not a lot of time is needed to teach contraception. Kids aren't ignorant of contraception methods, especially condoms. The problem is they don't use them.

11 posted on 01/02/2002 2:54:04 PM PST by jiggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
I suppose we should give up telling kids not to lie since they will do it anyway. Also, lets stop teaching them to wash their hair or brush their teeth--good personal hygiene--since many kids don't listen anyway and come to class with dirty hair or bad teeth. We wouldn't want anyone to feel bad.

For that matter, there will be murderers and robbers. No time in history has not had them, so, let's not make those future criminals feel excluded and bad. They just might be born that way.

12 posted on 01/02/2002 2:54:40 PM PST by Media2Powerful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Whoa! We did something right in New Jersey for once! (I live there.)

Way to go DiFrancesco! This is almost enough to make me consider forgiving you for what you did to Schundler. Nah. It's good, but it's not enough to make up for that.

Gamma

13 posted on 01/02/2002 4:34:29 PM PST by Gamma-131-I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
"Opponents say the new law will hurt children by taking valuable classroom time away from subjects such as contraception."

The above lame excuse not only shows that liberals are desperate, but it shows that they really hate our children enough that they want to withhold information that could keep our children from killing themselves, They might as well hold a loaded gun to their heads and teach them how to play russian roulette.

What else could explain liberals not wanting to teach children and I emphasize the word Children, that abstinence is the only thing that will keep them safe from diseases that may kill them, lifestyles that could destroy them, or from a pregnancy that would result in a child having a child or a child killing a child.

Abstinence until they are adults and have entered into a committed relationship(I believe marriage) is the only thing that will ensure that they become healthy and happy adults.

The same thing that can bring someone such immediate pleasure can also destroy their lives, especially if they engage in sexual activity before they are adults and mature.

14 posted on 01/02/2002 4:53:49 PM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamma-131-I
Exactly. Plus McGreevey will throw this out two weeks after taking office. New Jersey is lost. Our only hope is to split the state in two. We'll let the Municipalities along the Hudson and the Turnpike down to exit 9 go their socialist ways,we'll give Trenton and Camden to Pennsylvania, and form a new state. Ahh never mind, it's too late. Everytime I drive by George Washington's winter headquarters I just shake my head and feel bad for their sacrifice.
15 posted on 01/02/2002 5:06:13 PM PST by MattinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Thanks to Assemblywoman Marian Crecco, who has been trying to get this bill approved for close to 10 years. For some strange reason her fellow Catholic/Republican assemblymen did not support her until now. I wonder why?

Notice how it wasn't approved until "after" the Schundler for Governor election.

16 posted on 01/02/2002 5:36:33 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Thanks to Assemblywoman Marian Crecco, who has been trying to get this bill approved for close to 10 years. For some strange reason her fellow Catholic/Republican assemblymen did not support her until now. I wonder why?

Notice how it wasn't approved until "after" the Schundler for Governor election.

17 posted on 01/02/2002 5:37:56 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Am I the only one who thinks it is a bit seedy for the taxpayers to pay an adult to talk to kids about sex? The whole phenomenon reminds me of those late-night 1-900 ads.
18 posted on 01/02/2002 8:30:10 PM PST by Dumb_Ox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson