Skip to comments.
First ever Abortion-Breast Cancer Settlement [ABORTION causes BREAST CANCER]
www.RFMNEWS.com ^
| 12-27-01
Posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:11 AM PST by Notwithstanding
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
FYI
2
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:11 AM PST
by
Jean S
To: patent
Please ping all around.
This is great news - it is always good when the butchers have to watch their every step. Sadly, unfair lawsuits scare the hell out of doctors. In this case there is nothing sad about it - and certainly nothing unfair. I am hoping sucn lawsuits scare the hell out of abortionists.
To: Notwithstanding
"...expressed a sense of horror that researchers would selectively omit data for the most significant risk factor. It's horrible - but not shocking. The Left has always been about lies and it's usually women and children who suffer the most as a result of their lies.
To: Notwithstanding
This is great news To you it is great news, I am going to Hell!
5
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:12 AM PST
by
Nitro
To: Notwithstanding
This is great news..........it should happen in US. (I won't hold my breath)
6
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:12 AM PST
by
mickie
To: Notwithstanding
As much as I'm glad to hear about this case and their win. The following statement gives me the creeps. As a woman, I would think this wouldn't even have to be told to anyone.
, two Australian women commenced legal actions because their abortionists gave them no warning that there might be adverse psychiatric consequences.
7
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:12 AM PST
by
TXBubba
To: Notwithstanding; *Catholic_list; *Christian_list; *Abortion_list; *Pro_life; patent...
Good news indeed, pinging...
To: TXBubba
This info has been out there for a while. The problem is that planned parenthood with the assistance of media shills have been able to smear any attempt at discussion of the issue.
To: Nitro
Why do you say that? Everyone is redeemable. =)
10
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:13 AM PST
by
JMJ333
To: gov_bean_ counter
Oh, I know it has been out there. I've worked on the front lines at Pregnancy Counseling Centers. I was trying to make the point that our world is so screwed up that my sisters in womanhood somehow don't think there would be no psychological problems with killing a baby. Of course there are - and not just for the women but for the boyfriends, husbands, grandmothers etc.
11
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:14 AM PST
by
TXBubba
To: Notwithstanding
Although a direct linkage between the murder of their children via abortion and an increased risk of contracting breast cancer by the murderers is good news, it should be remembered that the liberal's response will be predictable...
More money and government protection (from lawsuits) for the murderer's abortionist-accomplices.
Even so, this is a wonderful opportunity for pro-life forces to capitalize on. The key will be to ignore or marginalize any fifth columnists in the pro-life movement who will (as sure as God made little green apples) council that this opportunity not be fully exploited.
12
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:14 AM PST
by
DWSUWF
To: Notwithstanding
Yah... as Fred Flintstone would say: Yabba Dabba Dooooooo... Not just as a scary thing for doctors to have to deal with, but maybe some women may take note of this while making a decision on abortion. I've never went to deep into the "planned parenthood" program, but I wonder if this danger is pointed out there? If not, it should be forced into the program by the government. Maybe we can sue more liberal garbage here?
To: anniegetyourgun
Especially the lie that it is just a lump of tissue and ignoring the mental anguish it has caused to countless millions of women.
To: Notwithstanding
Rohan's abortion data had been buried in a file cabinet, until [...]
Surprise.
15
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:15 AM PST
by
A. Pole
To: TXBubba
I meant "don't think there would be any psychological". It's late. I'm tired.
16
posted on
12/29/2001 12:18:15 AM PST
by
TXBubba
To: TXBubba
My better than better half has often articulated the same point. She is for more published pictures of the child at it's earliest recognizable stages. As I understand it takes a recognizable form real early.
To: Notwithstanding
I'm not sure I understand what data was withheld.
The Australian study, authored by Thomas E. Rohan et al and published in the American Journal of Epidemiology in 1988, was conducted on women from Adelaide, Australia. Rohan examined reproductive and dietary risk factors for the disease. Researchers determined Australian women who had abortions increased their risks for breast cancer by 160%.
Has anyone here actually read the American Journal of Epidemiology article? Were these findings from the study omitted from the article?
To: Nitro
To you it is great news, I am going to Hell! Heh, me too, probably. For reasons unrelated to abortion in my case, but none the less...
To: Blood of Tyrants
Yep. This one reminds me of the lie about how condoms will prevent one from contracting HIV/AIDS. Both require the user (of condoms and abortions) to play Russian roulette, while convincing them they are only playing tiddlywinks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson