Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notwithstanding
I'm not sure I understand what data was withheld.

The Australian study, authored by Thomas E. Rohan et al and published in the American Journal of Epidemiology in 1988, was conducted on women from Adelaide, Australia. Rohan examined reproductive and dietary risk factors for the disease. Researchers determined Australian women who had abortions increased their risks for breast cancer by 160%.

Has anyone here actually read the American Journal of Epidemiology article? Were these findings from the study omitted from the article?

18 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:15 AM PST by StopGlobalWhining
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: StopGlobalWhining
Apparently the most significant factor, abortion, was left out.

Did you miss this from the article?:

determined Australian women who had abortions increased their risks for breast cancer by 160%. As the study's most significant and only statistically significant risk factor, abortion was unparalleled among all of the variables examined. The elevated risk resulting from induced abortion far and away exceeded that of family history for the disease and even childlessness, according to the research. ... At a talk given in 1999 in Malvern, Australia, Brind said, "This is not what you see in scientific research, ever. I've never seen it before, where the most significant finding in a study is specifically left out of a research paper."

28 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:17 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson