Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antienvironmentalist
I reject creation because it cannot be scientifically proven.

I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven.

9 posted on 12/29/2001 12:10:07 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven.

The literal reading or the symbolic reading? Seems to me that someone who never had a science cource somehow got the basic chronology correct 3000 years ago. Since then, some other people have been inserting 'details' between the lines. Those details are usually wrong.

43 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:43 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
I don't want to get into an argument; I don't plan to reply (although I can't guarantee that I won't); I don't expect to convince you, or you to convince me, but may I please ask, in a nutshell, what part of "creation, as outlined in the Bible," has been "scientifically disproven"? Just for my info, so I'll have a better idea of what the other side believes. Thanks!
46 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:58 AM PST by allthingsnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
"I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven" Can you enlighten us since I don't remember the news of the discovery of the missing link? Thanks, Dobbyman
48 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:02 AM PST by dobbyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
"I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven."

And I reject faithless scientists who spend their days spewing the meaningless words of fellow heathens.

Perhaps they can trace their lineage to some puddle of mud or a tree swining primate, but I was created by God in His image and likeness.

Dust in the wind
All you are is dust in the wind...

49 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:05 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible,

Well now that's rich coming from one who "believes" in the Noosphere.

It's a damn pity the Protest-ants had to so completely undercut the Bible they worshipped by insisting every word was to be taken literally ... (per one's own Spirit-infused powers of interpretation, that is).

Until you can "scientifically disprove" the Magisterium's take, I think you should be more specific that you speak of creation as outlined by Bibliolators.

70 posted on 12/29/2001 12:14:25 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
Really? When? Where? I'm still looking. All I hear is a bunch of posturing and multi-syllabic words being thrown around. Please enlighten us backward and ignorant ones on this great event.
201 posted on 12/29/2001 6:31:31 PM PST by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
I think that the Bible and Evolution are compatible. It never specifies in the Bible whether a day is 24 of our hours, or 20 billion of our years. It's well possible both are true.


Just my two quid.
222 posted on 01/16/2002 12:58:27 PM PST by rightwingbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
How can the statement In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth be disproved?
224 posted on 01/16/2002 1:45:49 PM PST by jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson