To: antienvironmentalist
I reject creation because it cannot be scientifically proven. I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven.
9 posted on
12/29/2001 12:10:07 AM PST by
Physicist
To: Physicist
I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven. The literal reading or the symbolic reading? Seems to me that someone who never had a science cource somehow got the basic chronology correct 3000 years ago. Since then, some other people have been inserting 'details' between the lines. Those details are usually wrong.
43 posted on
12/29/2001 12:12:43 AM PST by
Ditto
To: Physicist
I don't want to get into an argument; I don't plan to reply (although I can't guarantee that I won't); I don't expect to convince you, or you to convince me, but may I please ask, in a nutshell, what part of "creation, as outlined in the Bible," has been "scientifically disproven"? Just for my info, so I'll have a better idea of what the other side believes. Thanks!
To: Physicist
"I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven" Can you enlighten us since I don't remember the news of the discovery of the missing link? Thanks, Dobbyman
48 posted on
12/29/2001 12:13:02 AM PST by
dobbyman
To: Physicist
"I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, because it has been scientifically disproven."And I reject faithless scientists who spend their days spewing the meaningless words of fellow heathens.
Perhaps they can trace their lineage to some puddle of mud or a tree swining primate, but I was created by God in His image and likeness.
Dust in the wind
All you are is dust in the wind...
To: Physicist
I reject creation, as outlined in the Bible, Well now that's rich coming from one who "believes" in the Noosphere.
It's a damn pity the Protest-ants had to so completely undercut the Bible they worshipped by insisting every word was to be taken literally ... (per one's own Spirit-infused powers of interpretation, that is).
Until you can "scientifically disprove" the Magisterium's take, I think you should be more specific that you speak of creation as outlined by Bibliolators.
70 posted on
12/29/2001 12:14:25 AM PST by
Askel5
To: Physicist
Really? When? Where? I'm still looking. All I hear is a bunch of posturing and multi-syllabic words being thrown around. Please enlighten us backward and ignorant ones on this great event.
To: Physicist
I think that the Bible and Evolution are compatible. It never specifies in the Bible whether a day is 24 of our hours, or 20 billion of our years. It's well possible both are true.
Just my two quid.
To: Physicist
How can the statement In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth be disproved?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson