Posted on 12/27/2001 12:53:07 AM PST by John W
I think that this can be mitigated by having all the local radio stations play Grateful Dead bootlegs for 24 hours after the initial exposure.
Don't believe me? Then try your own experiment. Toss a chemically-similar metal, "a few grams of lead" [a shotgun pellet would do] into a lake, and let me know when folks start showing symptoms of lead poisoning. "
The plutonium scenario was described to me by a friend of mine who's a physicist. There may be more details that I'm not aware of.
As for chemically similar metals, silver and gold are chemically similar, but not similarly reactive, no?
I'm not a chemist, so I don't know, but are lead and radioactive plutonium going to react the same way when immersed in water?
Silver and Gold don't. Mercury is a neighbor in the periodic table, and it will react even more differently.
So can fish.
Even (very rarely) in aquariums.
All of the "backflow preventers" I've seen have been vacuum breakers, required to prevent chemicals from being sucked into the supply lines if the water pressure fails, which would create a siphon effect. A vacuum breaker will open up when pressure drops, letting air be sucked into the system instead of chemicals. (You see these things on darkroom sinks, they look like a flat-bell-kinda thing at the top of a pipe.)
A check valve, on the other hand, is a one-way valve, i.e., a spring-loaded ball. Water can go one way because it pushes the ball into the spring, away from the valve seat. It can't go the other way, because it pushes the ball into the valve seat.
"Also, how would you prevent terrorists from disabling them?"
With the former, you don't. With the latter, you bury them outside the building, between the water mains and the distribution pipe to the building.
IMO the article paints an overly optimistic picture of the threat. What? Yeah, overly optimistic.
That stuff about "a sudden drop in water pressure in a targeted neighborhood as terrorists stopped the flow of water into a home or business" is IMO feel-good nonsense. If the bad guys hooked up a high pressure pump to a water faucet, opened the faucet, and started the pump injecting concentrated toxin into the pipes at a low rate of volume, I dunno, off the top of my head, a gallon or two a minute, they'd be able to effect a considerable amount of havoc with zero detectibility. I mean, hell, there'd be less pressure change from that than there'd be from someone turning on (or off) the faucet to wash his hands.
And where they got that stuff about a vacuum cleaner, I have no idea.
The problem, in a nutshell, is that our infrastructure -- from top to bottom -- was not designed for survivability in hell. It was designed to perform OK in a normal country, populated with normal people. You don't put a half-million dollars worth of bomb and radiation hardening around a ramshackle outhouse in the backyard. You put a hook-latch on the wooden door. IOW, you build the "security" measures to be commensurate with the anticipated level of threat.
We're facing the kind of nightmare that can only occur when a free society is attacked by a group of sociopaths. And the solution is to either retrofit an ever-increasing amount of safety measures (i.e., checkvalves on every supply line to every house and business in the country -- and mind you, that will only address the "poison into the pipes" problem, all other weak points will remain unprotected), or, to deal with the perpetrators of the crimes, and deal with them quickly, and mercilessly.
It's either that, or we let them win.
Why bother, when democrat politics, welfare state economics, and garden variety television will do the job so much more effectively? LSD wears off after a few hours, but The Great Society's effects are forever. (Or damned close to it.)
We cannot make our country safe against attack other than by killing all those who would attack it. Sad, but true.
And something the attackers should have thought seriously about before starting in. Although, from their warped perspective our non-response to their previous, less-efficient attacks essentially were a form of entrapment. We suckered them into this situation, and now they're going to die for it!
Maybe a salt?
I don't know much about plutonium. Lead poisoning is usuall from paint, but there are a few cases due to putting wine into a container that was glazed with lead. Romans got lead poisoning from pipes. And lead batteries have contaminated streams.
If you want to read something frightening, read about "pink disease" caused by mercury poisoning, from industrial waste that was dumped into a Japanese bay and got to people via the fish. There used to be a joke to feed your cats high fat dark meat tuna, since it contained mercury and would kill the cats. I don't know if that was true, but Minnesota Indians are warned not to eat local fish more than twice a week due to pollution.
Again, I can't remember if plutonium or uranium will make a salt. However, you don't really need something that rare.
I grew up drinking "mercury contaminated" water. In the Almaden Valley in San Jose, the Guadalupe Reservoir sits below the old Mercury mines. During a good part of the 19th century, these were the most productive mercury mines in the world. That's where the San Jose Mercury got its name.
Anyway, there were lots of mercury scares back in the 70s, but my Mom still lives there, and I'm not aware of any great epidemic of mercury related illnesses.
Not that mercury isn't toxic, I'm just tossing my experience onto the table.
LOL!
Well, that explains Gore Country... not too many wells in Gore Country, all public water distribution systems...
If terrorists didn't consider something as simple as water before they will now... and thanks to the press they have some initial ideas.
and... are we are not also the "press"
please, don't underestimate the brain-share horsepower of FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.