Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Democrats not likely to support Gore in '04
USA Today ^ | 12/18/01 | Richard Benedetto

Posted on 12/18/2001 4:12:44 PM PST by NorCoGOP

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:38:52 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: sboyd
They will throw up Senators Edwards, Clinton, maybe Durbin.

I'd throw up any of them, too. Of course, it would be projectile in the case of sinator clintbilly!

21 posted on 12/18/2001 6:21:34 PM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP

Well, he's always got the family restaurant if the '04 nomination falls through. And if he's able to settle out of court after punching this guy in the face.

22 posted on 12/18/2001 6:45:51 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
Amazing how good the DemoRATS are at changing history. An attempted stealing of the election by Gore has mutated into Bush stealing it, instead of the truth we all (including rats) saw before our very eyes on national television
All it took was the repeating of the idea over and over by the media for awhile, now it is a fact.
23 posted on 12/18/2001 6:50:47 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DKM
I agree with you, and was thinking the exact same thing.
24 posted on 12/18/2001 6:51:40 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Gee, I though Gore got a majority of the votes last time and *deserved* to be president. Wish those RATs would get their story straight.
25 posted on 12/18/2001 7:04:30 PM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
Just shows you how vicious those democRats are: One wee slip-up and you're, like, history. Totally. Sheesh.

This is one difference between the parties. Since 1952, there's been a Nixon, Dole or Bush on every Republican Presidential ticket except for 1964. If you look at the primaries, Reagan lost in 1976, but was back in 1980. Dole, well, let's not even go there. And of course there was Nixon. Defeated in 1960, he came back in 1968 and won.

26 posted on 12/18/2001 7:35:05 PM PST by Koblenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Nonetheless, 78% of those same Democrats polled now say they approve of the job Bush is doing as president.

When Dubya won.....America won! Even the RATs now know thatnow!

Thank God ......I mean really Thank God for a President who puts America first, respects the office of President and prays for Divine Guidance.

27 posted on 12/18/2001 7:45:37 PM PST by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Overall, 48% of Democrats say Bush won on a technicality, 25% say he stole the election and 24% say he won fair and square.
Nonetheless, 78% of those same Democrats polled now say they approve of the job Bush is doing as president.


Apparently only 22% of Democrats don't approve of the job Bush is doing. That's pretty amazing since 25% think he "stole the election." At least 3% must approve of his job performance AND think he "stole the election." I know the mentally ill are a core constituency for the Democrats, but wouldn't you almost have to be schizophrenic to think that GWB is some kind of anti-Constitutional usurper and also believe that he's doing a fine job?
28 posted on 12/18/2001 8:00:46 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
This will hurt Gore's chances for re-election.
29 posted on 12/18/2001 8:05:27 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: NorCoGOP
Overall, 48% of Democrats say Bush won on a technicality

Yep. The technicality was that he got more votes in the Electoral College.

let's go to DU and talk up Ted Kennedy as the rightful nominee.

31 posted on 12/18/2001 9:13:38 PM PST by womanvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruggers
"Nah, she won't run...."

You may be right. Lots of percieved trial balloons going up, though. Would not be surpised if the new annointed one, Dasshole, doesn't join the fray.

32 posted on 12/19/2001 4:29:03 AM PST by DKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DKM
Exactly
33 posted on 12/19/2001 4:31:40 AM PST by SmartEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
This goes to show us, then, that at least 48% of all Rats are IDIOTS that can't see facts for what they are....

48% don't know the facts, and don't care to learn the facts. They live in a a fog of ignorance fed by the Big Media machine. And they like it!
None in my direct family have any more than a superficial understanding of the election debacle and none even care to know what went on. The dangerous point is, they still have an opinion. An opinion based on a woefully limited and badly mis-understood set of 'facts'.

34 posted on 12/19/2001 4:37:39 AM PST by SmartEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson