Replies

This is good news - because someone is finally coming forward. It would be good to start hearing from more and more former Clinton "insiders" because it would indicate that (perhaps after Sept 11th) some of these people now understand the danger the Clintons have placed all Americans in at this time and in the forseeable future.)

Why don't the "media" pundits (the ones we can half way trust - O'Reilly, Brit Hume, Novak - ZERO IN on this fact:

The Democrats M.O. regarding "persuasion" of their potential enemies and/or of their "friends" ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS involved either:

1. Bribery for silence or compliant actions/words

2. Extortion or blackmailing (threats to reveal damaging information) for compliant actions or nonactions

3. Threats of violence for compliant actions or nonactions

Whan all else fails - or if the "target" is deemed too dangers and able to be removed without too much "suspicion" -

4. TAKING THE PERSON OUT OF ACTION TOTALLY (physical destruction either through contrived illness, plane/Chopper crash, automobile crash, or assorted methods of "Arkancide".

I suppose since these groups are "friendlies", the Dems knew that #1 would work just fine. Evidently, it did!

But what we want to know - is who exactly got the money and how much!

September 11th actually had nothing to do with it. Back in 1998 and 1999, a very astute commentator (I can't remember who it was) predicted that the truth about the Clinton presidency would eventually come out in stages as the statutes of limitations for the various crimes expired.

His prediction was based on the fact that anyone who was so thoroughly marginal that they would stand up for Clinton would eventually want to cash in on whatever inside information they could offer to a publisher.