Skip to comments.
Wife of Flight 93 Hero Gets Cold Shoulder from 9/11 Charities
NewsMax ^
| 12/13/01
Posted on 12/13/2001 2:38:51 PM PST by AmericaUnited
Thursday Dec. 13, 2001; 4:45 p.m. EST
Wife of Flight 93 Hero Gets Cold Shoulder from 9/11 Charities
Three months after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the wife of Flight 93 hero Jeremy Glick is struggling to make ends meet, since an array of charities created to help 9/11 victims have given her the brush off because of a technicality.
Lyzabeth Glick tells the New York Daily News that the national United Way hasn't been much help, telling her recently, "(your husband) was not in the World Trade Center, we're not giving you any funds."
The Federal Emergency Management Agency also gave Mrs. Glick and her two children the cold shoulder, explaining, "We're not giving any money to Flight 93 victims."
Even a promise from singer Kristy Jackson, who recorded "Little Did She Know" as a tribute to Jeremy Glick with an eye towards donating the proceeds to victims' families, hasn't panned out. Mrs. Glick says she has yet to see a cent from the song.
She, her young daughter and five-month-old son were at the White House Tuesday to commemorate the three month anniversary of the attacks, where they heard President Bush honoring the husband and father as "one of the heroes of Sept. 11" whose "courage may have saved the White House" when he and fellow Flight 93 passengers foiled the plans of the kamikaze hijackers at the cost of their own lives.
But her husband's hero status hasn't meant much in terms getting some of the money donated to 9/11 victims. After collecting a mere $5,000 from her local United Way and $25,000 from the Red Cross, she's now all tapped out.
With charity after charity giving Mrs. Glick the runaround, she now hopes to find a teaching job to keep the bank from foreclosing on her home.
TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-197 next last
To: AmericaUnited
ATTENTION EVERYONE! Can we stop beating up the victim for a moment and get back to the original purpose of this thread... TO BEAT UP THE CHARITIES!!!Excellent point. I can understand that some of the money was donated to specific groups, ie the firemen and the police...but does anyone have any idea why FEMA would deny assistance to the families of the victims of Flight 93?
101
posted on
12/13/2001 4:06:20 PM PST
by
JD86
To: TheDon
I agree with Howlin and JD86. I have a great deal of sympathy, and have grieved, for this woman and her children, and for all of those who lost family members at WTC or on the airplanes. That doesn't translate to believing that the survivors are not responsible for their own living expenses. There was a time in our history when we didn't expect everyone else to take care of us. We all should plan ahead, especially if we have young children. Poor planning on someone else's part does not require that the rest of us foot the bill for his survivors' living expenses forever.
To: JD86
...members of the NYC Bar Association donated their time to probate estates for the victims of 9/11... An exception to the rule. Besides, members of the NYCBA are donating their time to help those aliens being detained under suspicion of aiding and abetting the terrorists.
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
they took the entire $30,000.00!and you Sir, have no idea what you are talking about...
104
posted on
12/13/2001 4:08:37 PM PST
by
JD86
To: JD86
Can we stop beating up the victim for a moment and get back to the original purpose of this thread... TO BEAT UP THE CHARITIES!!! I think beating up attorneys is much more fun. Besides, weren't you the one who started beating up the victim's family? You callous brute!
To: Howlin
Most men only provide for a get-on-your feet period, anyway. I think the charities have enough of our $$$ to do more, and they ought to, and for flight 93 in particular.
I'm saying the heroes of that flight deserve our help providing for their families, and if we can make it so that income for his expected lifetime is replaced, I'd be proud to do it.
106
posted on
12/13/2001 4:12:02 PM PST
by
SarahW
To: AmericaUnited
Oreilly@foxnews.com . . . .copy and paste this article and send it to him. We gotta help.
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
...members of the NYC Bar Association donated their time to probate estates for the victims of 9/11... An exception to the ruleIn other words, nothing good that any attorney does means anything to you. Since I am one, please keep your negative comments to yourself. Thank you.
108
posted on
12/13/2001 4:14:22 PM PST
by
JD86
To: AmericaUnited
The 9-11 Fund was established to assist the families of the massacres of 9-11. Flight 93 was a part of that massacre as were the those murdered in the Pentagon massacre. These charities need to be dismantled, they are obviously incompetent.
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Please see # 108
JD86, Attorney at Law
110
posted on
12/13/2001 4:15:44 PM PST
by
JD86
To: Tree of Liberty
There's a talk radio guy here in Tampa who did a radio fund raiser for a family from here who lost the husband/father serving at the Pentagon. In just a couple of hours, the listeners gave about $30,000.00, then one man called in and said he'd match that. They also had a golf tournament for the family. All in all, they raised $90,000.00 for the family in one afternoon.
He was in the military so he's eligible for related benefits, and he undoubtedly had SGLI, but that doesn't go too far. No whining and moaning about the "charities", just down home people helping people.
Just an idea for the locals...
To: WIladyconservative
I read the Airlines gave each family $25,000.00 after the crash. So, in addition to the 30 thousand, she also got that. People gave that money to go to the families of the people who were killed, it should go to them. The problem is people put their trust in the Red Cross and United Way. That is where they made their first mistake.
112
posted on
12/13/2001 4:18:16 PM PST
by
esmith
To: JD86
and you Sir, have no idea what you are talking about... No need to capitalize "sir"...not yet anyway. Her Majesty has offered me a knighthood if I am successful in slaying evil attorneys in mass. Perhaps another cross on the Union Jack in my honour, too.
Anyway, everyone knows that the attorneys took it all!
To: JD86
Perhaps they're afraid that it would set a precedent for becoming responsible for all plane crashes. Just an idea, I'm not advocating that position!
To: SarahW
Most men only provide for a get-on-your feet period, anyway. Not the men I know.
I'm not saying they don't deserve help. I'm saying HE should have thought of that, too.
115
posted on
12/13/2001 4:21:30 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Go Dub Go
Your Post #71 summed it up very well. Your sister is fortunate to have you for a brother and she also has my condolances.
116
posted on
12/13/2001 4:21:57 PM PST
by
cibco
To: GatorGirl
That's a great response for the local community. And it makes sure there is nothing skimmed off the top for administrative fees and expenses. Well Done!
117
posted on
12/13/2001 4:22:01 PM PST
by
JD86
To: McGavin999
And now we are hearing reports on the radio about donations for Christmas are down; in North Carolina, it's down eight million dollars! Big surprise, eh?
118
posted on
12/13/2001 4:23:41 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: GatorGirl
Good point on the FEMA reaction. You may be right. Also, FEMA is more for disaster relief...not a one time death benefit payor.
119
posted on
12/13/2001 4:24:13 PM PST
by
JD86
To: esmith
You are right, all the way around. Well put.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-197 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson