Posted on 12/10/2001 7:30:51 PM PST by blam
these were already added and pinged, and are related:
Evidence Aquits Clovis People Of Ancient Killings, Archaeologists Say
University Of Washington ^ | 2-25-2003 | Joel Schwartz
Posted on 02/25/2003 4:46:54 PM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/851809/posts
First Americans
Discover ^ | 2-1999 | Karen Wright
Posted on 10/06/2002 9:57:05 PM PDT by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/764305/posts
First Americans
Discover ^ | 9-1999 | Karen Wright
Posted on 07/15/2003 5:52:59 PM PDT by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/946813/posts
Jomon Fishing Site Discovered
Yomiuri.com ^ | 3-29-2004 | Yomiuri Shimbun
Posted on 03/29/2004 11:58:24 AM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107336/posts
Rediscovering America.
(The New World May Be 20,000 Years Older Than Experts Thought)
Blue Corn Comics (?) ^ | Charles W, Petit
Posted on 12/10/2003 1:30:57 PM PST by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037905/posts
You mean this?
Have you seen the latest from the Topper site in South Carolina? Goodyear (archaeologist) is reporting dates of human occupation exceeding 50,000 years. (It was posted 3-4 times on FR)
Immigrants From The Other Side (Clovis Is Solutrean)
"The Topper site is interesting...you and other archeo-freepers keep us amateurs well-informed!"
We're all amateurs except I believe FReeper Coyoteman is a practicing archaeologist...PhD I think.
Wow. Woeful ignorance and religious bigotry all in one post.
Kudos.
Don't you know that Catholics follow the dictates of the Anti-Christ? It's all right there in that old invalid RC "bible". C'mon, you should know this stuff . . .
well, the first brits are thought to have come across during the Ice age when the English channel was either shallow or non-existant (and the Mediterranean was an inland lake)
Be thankful for global warming. Without it you would not be here.
If other populations pre-date the Indian, then what happened to them? If the Indians aren't the perfect beings who fell to the ravenous Whites, then perhaps they simply conquered the others. Many other peoples have done so throughout history.
your point is well taken. when it suits people to use darwin's third claim in their theory of evolution (survival of the fittest), they do so. when it is not politically expedient to so do, then victimhood is played out to its fullest.
the king james bible was the greates work of its kind of its time. however, if i spoke the english that king james spoke in the 1600s, i would be perfectly happy to use his bible. rather, i want a bible translated from the original manuscripts that use the language that i use to today. to do otherwise, is to present a work that cannot be fully appreciated or understood.
If the continents were originally connected at the Atlantic Ocean, and then drifted apart, then Alaska an Siberia would have been further apart in the past, not linked by a land bridge.
South America and Africa began breaking apart about 120 million years ago...and, continue to drift apart at about the same rate that your fingernails grow. Don't know about Alaska - Siberia.
All humans come by water.
Please note, that I have sent a formal complaint message to the moderator, as I have no recollection of ever saying this in December of 2001. I do not know how this happened. If I did say this in 2001, then please know, that this is not my current thinking.
I am in the process of going back through my replies to investigate this. I do not know how far back comments are stored.
To blam..do you remember if this is completely in context?
I am busy now, but I will get to this later.
ooops, didn't notice the date of the post -- just saw red and went in, all guns firing! Apologies!
DAMN! That blows my theory that they flew here!
No problem, I just can't figure out my comment. I don't believe I've ever taken that position, and I can't figure out why or how I would ever had said that.
sorry, i did not mean to offend you to the point where you would have felt the need to file a complaint. i apologize.
i was not paying attention to the date -- 2001 -- and thought that it was more current. i typically do not respond to things that old.
please do not waste your time tracing this down on my account.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.