Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAILED ANTHRAX FINALLY THE TRUTH?
Medium Rare articles | December 6, 2001 | Jim Rarey

Posted on 12/06/2001 5:34:13 PM PST by Medium Rare

MEDIUM RARE

By Jim Rarey

December 6, 2001

MAILED ANTHRAX FINALLY THE TRUTH?

It has too often been the case in the last decade or so, the truth about important events is first published either on the Internet or in a foreign newspaper. And it usually is in direct contradiction to the (authorized) leaks from “knowledgable” but unidentified government officials propagated by the “mainstream” media. The subject of mailed anthrax has followed this pattern.

Many (too many) Americans will only accept “facts” when they see them on the eleven o’clock network news or read them in the establishment newspapers, e.g. The New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times. One of the earliest bits of misinformation that probably resulted in several deaths was the assurance that those not in the vicinity where the envelope containing the anthrax spores was opened had nothing to worry about.

That had to be revised when victims hundred of miles from the capitol came down with anthrax poisoning. Cross contamination was finally acknowledged, but the danger was downplayed contending that treatment with Cipro (and later other antibiotics) was 100% effective in those cases.

We were told that inhalation of anthrax would require a concentration of eight to ten thousand spores in the lungs to be potentially fatal. We were told initially that the anthrax mailed was “crude” in form and could easily have been used by foreign terrorists. This was reinforced by repetitive showings of the crude lettering on the envelopes on TV.

As test results began to filter out, the focus of the media changed to the “weaponization” of anthrax spores, i.e. milling them down to a diameter of one to three microns. (A micron is one millionth of a meter.) This required a degree of expertise beyond that of a single individual without access to a fairly sophisticated laboratory.

After a spate of “speculation” in the media that a “right wing fanatic” might have been responsible, the FBI released a “profile” of its suspect. Predictably, they postulated a “loner” who may have worked in a laboratory and acquired a couple of test tubes of anthrax he kept in his basement for all these years. After the 911 tragedy this person, for his own reasons might have mailed the anthrax.

As test results confirmed the (Ames) strain of anthrax used in the mailings, attention began to focus on the army’s top-secret bioweapon laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland. The Ames strain is one of the most virulent (deadly) strains available and was in high demand both for developing weapons and vaccines to protect against all strains. Ft. Detrick’s records are incomplete but it is known to have furnished the Ames strain to Britain’s Porton Down laboratory, a number of university and private labs and probably to Iraq.

During the cold war, Ft. Detrick, Britain’s Porton Down, Russia and South Africa produced and stockpiled large amounts of toxic biological and chemical weapons including anthrax. In 1969, in contemplation of a treaty signed in 1972, President Nixon ordered Ft. Detrick to cease production and destroy the stockpiles. Although research and development was done at Ft. Detrick, the actual production and storage was at the army’s facility in the Pine Bluffs Redstone Arsenal in Arkansas.

Now, some thirty years later, the U.S. Government appears to be relying on the expertise of two cold war bioweapon veterans, Dr.’s William C. Patrick III, and Kenneth Alibek, President and CEO of Advanced Biosystems Inc. (ABS).

Patrick was in charge of the anthrax “weaponization” program at Ft. Detrick. He developed a process that resulted in anthrax far more potent than that known to have been produced by Britain or Russia. He holds five secret patents on the process. The army’s anthrax comprised up to one trillion spores per gram, double the amount other programs reached. To put that in perspective, if 10,000 spores is a lethal dose, then the two grams said to have been in the envelope addressed to Senator Daschle had enough for 200 million lethal doses. A gram is just one-twenty-eighth of an ounce.

But even the 8 to 10 thousand spore number is misleading the public according to Edgar W. “Bud” Larson, one of several other Ft. Detrick veterans who granted on the record interviews to Scott Shane of the Baltimore Sun. Larson says that number (which he helped develop) is an average for lethal doses. Depending on several factors, 100 spores or less could be fatal. Larson was head of the aerobiology division at Detrick. Another veteran of the biowars, Norman M. Covert, adds that their experiments showed that spores of one to four microns easily escaped from ordinary envelopes, which have pores of ten microns.

Another former Detrick expert is Manuel S. Barbeito who was in charge of decontaminating 75 to 100 buildings at Ft. Detrick after the program was shut down. He has doubts about the chlorine dioxide cleanup method that the EPA has chosen for the Hart Senate Office building. Barbeito says he experimented with many methods before settling on formaldehyde gas.

All three experts are puzzled as to why the government has only contacted Patrick and not taken advantage of other expertise available.

Patrick has been a long time consultant to the government on bioweapons and bioterrorism. When the First Deputy of the USSR’s bioweapons program (Kanatjan Alibekov) defected to the U.S. in 1992, Patrick was called in by the intelligence agencies to help debrief him.

Alibekov, now known by his Americanized name of Kenneth Alibek has become a colleague of Patrick as President and CEO of Advanced Biosystems a wholly owned subsidiary of Hadron, Inc. Hadron, a large defense contractor describes itself as, “specializing in developing innovative technical solutions for the intelligence community, analyzing and supporting defense systems (including intelligent weapons systems and biological weapons defense).”

Alibek’s Advanced Biosystems has received more than $3 million in government grants (including one for $800,000 this October) for work on defenses against anthrax. Yesterday (Wednesday Dec. 5, 2001) Alibek testified before the House International Relations Committee. An Associated Press dispatch quotes him as saying of the mailed anthrax, “It was a primitive process, but it was a workable process. I would say that they are not very highly trained professionals,” Alibek said of whoever sent the anthrax letters.

Alibek’s statement is in direct contradiction to the opinion of Dr. Richard Spertzel, former head of the U.N. weapons inspection program in Iraq and experts cited by the New York Times in a Dec. 3 article this week. Spertzel supported those experts contention that the mailed anthrax was top quality saying, “(This) is not the kind of thing you mess around with in a university lab.” Spertzel, who also testified at the hearing, said the FBI’s profile of the anthrax killer as a deranged loner “is a lot of hokum.”

Lab experts cited by the New York Times say the mailed anthrax reached the one trillion spores per gram threshold and could only have been made using Patrick’s patented process.

While no other countries are known to have duplicated Patrick’s process, there is an interesting sidelight involving one of the pieces of equipment involved in it.

Charlie Trie, the Little Rock restaurant owner, long time friend of, (illegal) fund-raiser for Bill Clinton, and member of a Mafia-like Chinese Triad, according to the FBI, helped the Chinese germ warfare program obtain a 132-gallon medical fermentation tank. The equipment is an integral part of the process of producing toxic bacteria and export to China required a permit from the Department of Commerce.

Trie met several times in China with Zhang Jianming, director of China’s germ warfare program. He later arrange a trip to the United States for Zhang and accompanied him in his travels. One stop was Little Rock, Arkansas where Zhang was introduced to an American scientist.

In a February 26th article last year, WorldNetDaily’s Paul Sperry revealed that the American scientist named Peter Fu had invested $40,000 in a shell company set up by Trie to obtain the equipment for transshipment to China. Fu’s wife worked for the company for a short time but dropped out after a few weeks. When interviewed by the FBI, Fu claimed the $40,000 was a loan to Trie.

This sidebar is not meant to imply that China was the source of the mailed anthrax. Rather, its possible significance lies in the fact that Peter Fu (at that time) was the Deputy Director of the FDA’s Division of Biochemical Toxicology in its National Center for Toxicological Research. The center is located on the grounds of the Pine Bluffs Redstone Arsenal, the site of anthrax production and storage. Fu’s first loyalties may not lie with the U.S. According to his biography on the FDA website, Fu is still at that location as a research chemist.

Are there dots to be connected in this mystery of the mailed anthrax? At the very least, there are a number of questions that need to be asked….and answered.

Permission is granted to reproduce this article in its entirety.

The author is a free lance writer based in Romulus, Michigan. He is a former newspaper editor and investigative reporter, a retired customs administrator and accountant, and a student of history and the U.S. Constitution.

If you would like to receive Medium Rare articles directly, please contact us at jimrarey@provide.net.

Although not necessary, we would appreciate an indication of the city and/or state or country (If outside the USA) in which you are located to give us an idea as to where our articles are being received.


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: anthrax; anthraxscarelist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: UCANSEE2
Did you hear? They got 'em! Pakistanis in CT who had the Vietnamese woman who died in NYC mail them.

Click here for GOOD NEWS!!

21 posted on 12/06/2001 8:47:50 PM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Did you hear? They got 'em! Pakistanis in CT who had the Vietnamese woman who died in NYC mail them.

Click here for GOOD NEWS!!

22 posted on 12/06/2001 8:48:43 PM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doxteve
Did you hear? They got 'em! Pakistanis in CT who had the Vietnamese woman who died in NYC mail them.

Click here for GOOD NEWS!!

23 posted on 12/06/2001 8:49:24 PM PST by meridia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: meridia
Thanks for the ping. I hate to brag but this was my theory all along. Good deal!
24 posted on 12/06/2001 8:54:16 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Medium Rare
Interesting! Bump for later reading!
25 posted on 12/06/2001 8:59:46 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doxteve
Anywone else remember this, and could possibly provide a link or site? Thanks Doc Steve

I re-call something from AK but darned if I remember. Did you check the anthrax thread? Many posters are caching the data there.

26 posted on 12/06/2001 9:12:09 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
I think it is Antrax_scare_list.
27 posted on 12/06/2001 9:13:42 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: keri
More clues.
28 posted on 12/06/2001 10:15:15 PM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right_to_defend; aristeides; patriciaruth; maestro
ping
29 posted on 12/06/2001 10:23:12 PM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist; M. Thatcher; nimdoc; Mitchell; Dark Wing
ping
30 posted on 12/06/2001 10:24:22 PM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keri
What is he saying?

An Arkansas-China-Iraq connection?

That would be quite unexpected.

31 posted on 12/06/2001 10:55:28 PM PST by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nogbad
Ah, so!

Now we get some real information.

Thanks!

32 posted on 12/07/2001 3:00:16 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Medium Rare
FYI--

Chinese Germ Warfare Ignored By State Dept.

33 posted on 12/07/2001 3:07:40 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doxteve
I think this is the link you are looking for.
34 posted on 12/07/2001 3:10:03 AM PST by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thanks. In spite of all the information available, there are still those who believe that GWB is sincere in his "war on terrorism."

It is as many of us predicted although Al Gore would have been no different. My bigget disappointment has been "Janet" Ashcroft.

35 posted on 12/07/2001 5:06:55 AM PST by Medium Rare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nogbad
Ft. Detrick's records are incomplete but it is known to have furnished the Ames strain to Britain's Porton Down laboratory, a number of universtiy private labs and probably to Iraq.

Just a couple of things here. Detrick did share Ames with Porton Down, but Iraq didn't receive *any* anthrax from Porton Down (or from anywhere in the UK) after the mid-eighties. We can rule out universities and private labs as being the source of the the spores, and the strain. It may be possible the strain was acquired from a private or universtiy lab, but I doubt it.

"It was a primitive process, but it was a workable process. I would say that they are not highly trained professionals," Alibek said of whoever sent the anthrax letters.

When Ken Alibek talks, people should listen. He is talking about the means of delivery, and people who actually mailed the letters, not the people who produced the spores.

As far as the China-Iraq connection -- it's an interesting speculation, but I don't think China is involved in this.

36 posted on 12/07/2001 7:24:23 AM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nogbad
???????????????

More irrelevant facts?

The plot thickens.

37 posted on 12/07/2001 9:28:06 AM PST by nimdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: keri
Ft. Detrick's records show that seven different strains of anthrax were sent to Iraq during the Iran/Iraq war. The Ft. Detrick spokesperson said they couldn't be sure one of the seven wasn't Ames. It was said that Ames was not always labeled as that and somethimes had a different description.

As for Porton Down, in 1998 Iraq made a specific request for the Ames strain. Britain says that request was denied. However, this was during the timeframe that Fuad el Hibri was in charge there (current CEO at Bioport in Michigan)and Fuad admitted he had authorized shipment of anthrax to Saudi Arabia and other "friendly countries" in the near east.

I was not saying there was a China/Iraq connection although that's an inference one could draw. What I was trying to show was that security was as lax at Pine Bluffs Redstone Arsenal as it was (and still is)at the other ten "secret" labs the U.S. has.

Who knows whose hands anthrax may have fallen into after it left Pine Bluffs? That's anyone's guess.

38 posted on 12/07/2001 11:37:42 AM PST by Medium Rare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: keri
When Ken Alibek talks, people should listen. He is talking about the means of delivery, and people who actually mailed the letters, not the people who produced the spores.

I don't think you're right. Here is the full quote from the AP dispatch.

"It was a primitive process, but a workable process," Alibek said of the anthrax. He said he has reviewed photographs of some of the anthrax mailed to the news media and to politicians.

The other quote from AP is, "I would say preliminarily that they are not very highly trained professionals." Alibek said of whoever sent the anthrax letters. "It could be homegrown or foreign, I cannot answer this question."

I do listen when people who claim to be experts talk. Believing is another thing entirely. Either Alibek made a big mistake in trying to base his opinions on photographs rather than microsopic or spectrographic analysis, or he was dissembling.

You believe whatever you want to believe.

39 posted on 12/07/2001 11:54:22 AM PST by Medium Rare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Medium Rare
Good work.

Intriguing.

Bump.

40 posted on 12/07/2001 12:10:20 PM PST by ez2muz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson