Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAILED ANTHRAX FINALLY THE TRUTH?
Medium Rare articles | December 6, 2001 | Jim Rarey

Posted on 12/06/2001 5:34:13 PM PST by Medium Rare

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Medium Rare
Whoa. I wasn't directing my comment about listening to Alibek at you, but at the AP report. All we have we get from reporters. Alibek is probably being honest; he doesn't know whether this is foreign or homegrown. I don't think anyone knows, or can answer that question yet.

Maybe the producers of the Ames spores came by the strain legitimately, but based on other reports I very seriously doubt that's the case.

I do think Alibek was talking about delivery here, because of comments he has made elsewhere.

41 posted on 12/07/2001 12:17:50 PM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Medium Rare
I forgot to tell you I understand the point about security. Obviously, Ames has fallen into the wrong hands. Personally, I believe the strain and our bio-technology was stolen by someone on the inside, and then sold for money.
42 posted on 12/07/2001 12:27:50 PM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: keri
There are any number of possibilites as to how the Ames strain bacteria got into the wrong hands. That's just one of the possibilities.

However, getting a hold of Patrick's patented process is an entirely different thing. I don't think it could have been picked up just from observation at Pine Bluffs.

Getting the bacteria strain is only half way down the road to weaponized bacteria.

43 posted on 12/07/2001 12:47:14 PM PST by Medium Rare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Medium Rare
I totally agree with everything in #43. It's just my bias that I believe in the competence of private anthrax researchers, and their ability to keep a military strain of anthrax out of the wrong hands. (I prefer a thief, and preferably one from Detrick, since that's my bet:-))

I'll be away from my terminal for a few days, but will check the thread when I return.

Thanks.

44 posted on 12/07/2001 1:10:51 PM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: keri
I think your bias is based on faith because the record certainly doesn't support it.

Of course many of the so-called "private" organizations are really government proprietaries.

Hope you had a nice rest away from the addictive Internet.

45 posted on 12/07/2001 5:47:21 PM PST by Medium Rare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
46 posted on 12/08/2001 7:15:54 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
47 posted on 12/08/2001 7:29:27 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Medium Rare; right_to_defend; Dark Wing
The crucial point here is the alleged analysis indicating that the US method of aerolsolization was used, which is having so many spores per gram. That makes an American thief of US stocks of weaponized anthrax more likely than an Iraqi source.
49 posted on 12/08/2001 1:04:44 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson