Skip to comments.
Imagine a World without Guns
NRO ^
| 5 Dec 2001
| Kopel, Eisen, Gallant
Posted on 12/05/2001 6:59:27 AM PST by white trash redneck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: white trash redneck
To: white trash redneck
Yeah, no guns would mean the return of Bows and arrows, sabers, knives, sling shot like David used to slay the giant or as the Mother in Houston did, use the bath tub to kill her children. GUNS DO NOT KILL, PEOPLE DO. The gun cannot fire itself. Liberals lack any common sense, they are in a dream world.
22
posted on
12/05/2001 7:34:53 AM PST
by
Texbob
Bump for an excellent piece. My only slight gripe to some of the responses is the use of the word "liberal" in reference to people who seek to empower the government to ban firearm ownership among citizens.
Such people are most decidedly not liberal, in any sense of the word, however much they might like to think of themselves that way.
They are authoritarians.
To: BlueLancer
We can begin by imagining the enactment of laws which ban all non-government possession of firearms.That's not a world without guns. From this point on the whole article is a bunch of BS.
24
posted on
12/05/2001 7:37:03 AM PST
by
Flint
To: white trash redneck
A world without guns! HAHAHAHA! We could take over with a butter knife and a pointy stick! HAHAHAHA!
Or, to quote Kodos, "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
To: white trash redneck
When I was 11 or 12, I made my own muzzle-loader from a weightlifting tube, loaded with match heads. It worked great, though I'm now amazed that I didn't maim myself.
You can't keep guns from any industrious person.
To: dtom
Flame me all you want, but I refuse to elevate the beatles to the music-god status everyone else has. I pesonaly think their music sucked, and I cant stomach thier politics, especialy Lennon's. He should have spelled his name L-e-n-i-n.
27
posted on
12/05/2001 7:39:33 AM PST
by
sean327
To: white trash redneck
OHHHH a world without guns....we would be such a big happy family then....It just gives me such a warm and fuzzy feeling...I think its time for a..............................
BIG HUG
![](http://pbskids.org/teletubbies/images/ins_tubbies.gif)
/sarcasm
To: BlueLancer
BUMP
29
posted on
12/05/2001 7:47:36 AM PST
by
Aurelius
To: white trash redneck
Whenever they play John Lennon's "Imagine" they should show a video in the background the Hutu genocide with machetes.
30
posted on
12/05/2001 7:49:45 AM PST
by
Wm Bach
To: sean327
sean327 I'm with you all the way, but look what happen to for posting a few negative things about the originators of the "I hate America" four.
THE BEATLES
31
posted on
12/05/2001 7:53:00 AM PST
by
dtom
To: white trash redneck
Somewhere I read a quote that said "Those who pound their swords into plowshares will be ruled by those who don't"
32
posted on
12/05/2001 8:00:11 AM PST
by
SMDC/TLX
To: ReasonedVoice
Another tenet of modern liberalism, deconstructed and shown to be a lie.
To: white trash redneck
Imagine a World where you are the only person without a gun.
Imagine a world with no guns ruled by gangs of thugs with sticks.
To: white trash redneck
Once we have a world without liberals and criminals, tyrannical governments, war, and under-control animal populations, I'll still want my guns. So imagine a world without guns? Hell no!!!!!!
To: Texbob
Yeah, no guns would mean the return of Bows and arrows, sabers, knives, sling shot like David used to slay the giant or as the Mother in Houston did, use the bath tub to kill her children. We have all those items now, but they pose little threat to the liberal ruling elite. Only guns give the "peon" the ability reach out and touch even the elite hiding behind their most skilled guards. A peasant with a sword has almost no chance against a samurai with a sword. A peasant with a rifle has an almost-even chance against an expert rifleman, or at least a vastly better chance than his sword-armed equivalent.
Liberals don't have to explicity posit this principle. Their built-in instincts for survival and advancement will do it for them.
In the end, gun control is merely the means that the statist elite (mostly liberals) use to try and protect themselves from any negative consequences that might arise from their evil policies.
Looking back at history, we see that the gun, and only the gun has been the one real "equalizer" that can hinder out-of-control elites. It equalized the relationship between the powerful and skilled, and the weak. The liberals, who worship "equality", absolutely hate that kind of equality.
To: Texbob
Hey, if you want some cool tales of murder, read "12 Caesars," by Suetonius. It'll give you chills, all the ways Romans had to off each other. If they'd had hypodermic needles, they might have wiped out the empire entirely.
To: MoralSense
The Lateran Council of 1139 outlawed the crossbow because that weapon allowed a peasant foot soldier to kill an armored knight -- obviously not part of God's plan.
To: white trash redneck
When I imagine a world without guns, I imagine the 13th century.
To: white trash redneck
Excellent post
40
posted on
12/05/2001 10:21:05 AM PST
by
Mikey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson