Skip to comments.
Astronomers Find Massive Black Hole in Galaxy
Reuters ^
| 11/28/2001 2:56 pm ET
| Reuters
Posted on 11/28/2001 11:39:15 AM PST by mdittmar
LONDON (Reuters) - Astronomers have calculated the mass of the heaviest stellar black hole in our galaxy in a discovery that turns the accepted theory of how such objects are formed and behave on its head. Scientists at the Astrophysical Institute in Potsdam, Germany, and the European Southern Observatory in Chile said the huge black hole has 14 times more mass than the Sun and is in a remote area of the Milky Way almost 40,000 light-years away.
A light year is about six trillion miles.
The black hole and the star that revolves around it and feeds it are in the stellar system called GRS1915+105.
Black holes suck in everything near them including light and can only be detected by the activity around their edges. Stellar black holes, the remnants of dead Sun-like stars, typically have the mass of three to seven Suns.
"The one that I found is 14," Jochen Greiner, of the Astrophysical Institute, said in a telephone interview.
Greiner and his colleagues identified the star that feeds the black hole by studying the steady flow of stellar material. In research reported in the science journal Nature, they estimated the mass of the black hole by analyzing the orbital motion of the star around it.
The distance between the star and the black hole is about half the distance between the Earth and the Sun.
The size of GRS1915+105, which astronomers have dubbed a microquasar, has cast doubt over the theories on how black holes are formed.
Scientists consider microquasars, binary systems consisting of a normal star and a black hole or neutron star, as natural laboratories for testing Einstein's general theory of relativity.
GRS1915+105 is one of a handful of microquasars in our galaxy. Scientists are puzzled by the size of the black hole because the interaction in a binary system increases the mass loss of the star and they don't know how it can retain enough mass to form such a massive black hole.
"The big mystery now is how can theory explain these 14 solar masses which I have measured," said Greiner.
"The present theory cannot explain how to produce such large masses," he added.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
DA DUN ,DADUN,DADUN,DADUN..
1
posted on
11/28/2001 11:39:15 AM PST
by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
This might be where all my socks went.
To: mdittmar
black holes suck
To: mdittmar
Bill Clinton's Harlem office?
To: mdittmar
Scientists are puzzled by the size of the black hole because the interaction in a binary system increases the mass loss of the star and they don't know how it can retain enough mass to form such a massive black hole.I can't make heads or tails of this sentence, and it's the key to the whole article.
5
posted on
11/28/2001 11:44:26 AM PST
by
Physicist
To: mdittmar
Al Gore invented black holes
6
posted on
11/28/2001 11:45:10 AM PST
by
Tai_Chung
To: Physicist
Clearly, the black hole existed before it drifted into the star system it's now in. It's feeding off of the current star (the "binary system" made up of the star and the black hole), but this current star is likely only the black hole's current victim. To be as massive as it seems, it must have devoured other stars in its path. That's probably the simplest, and most likely explanation.
7
posted on
11/28/2001 11:47:06 AM PST
by
My2Cents
To: mdittmar
Black holes are created upon the collapse of a populated planet. This can only occur once it has been completely taken over by liberals....
Now, do I get the Nobel Peace Prize?...or does someone want to wait and see if I'm right?
To: mdittmar
I bet it is just a reflection of Hillarys Butt where she finally pulled her head out!!!
To: mdittmar
I guess we're all doomed:^)
10
posted on
11/28/2001 11:50:08 AM PST
by
geege
To: mdittmar
The present theory cannot explain how to produce such large masses," he added. Maybe neutrinos are not exactly massless, after all?
(Just kidding, don't flame me)
11
posted on
11/28/2001 11:50:47 AM PST
by
TopQuark
To: Physicist
because the sentence seems to contradict itself??
Increase the mass loss of the star (the exising star?)
vs.
how it can retain enough mass to form such a massive black hole. ("it" being the black hole)
To: My2Cents
We are the Borg.
Resistance is Futile
To: mdittmar
Black holes are caused by global warming. And second hand smoke. Isn't it obvious? We must ban SUV's and cigarettes now!
14
posted on
11/28/2001 11:53:56 AM PST
by
LJLucido
To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior
Black hole alert.
To: Physicist
It is a very stupid sentence. Am I correct in stating that there is no limit to the mass of a black hole?
If that's the case, it can suck in as much as it damn well pleases. Like the government.
16
posted on
11/28/2001 11:54:44 AM PST
by
dead
To: My2Cents
"Clearly, the black hole existed before it drifted into the star system it's now in. It's feeding off of the current star (the "binary system" made up of the star and the black hole), but this current star is likely only the black hole's current victim. To be as massive as it seems, it must have devoured other stars in its path. That's probably the simplest, and most likely explanation."
Sounds a lot like the plot to one of the original Star Trek episodes.
To: My2Cents
I would think that it is extremely unlikely (even on an astronomical scale) that a wandering black hole would just perfectly approach a small star, so that they would end up in such a binary configuration, ie without the orbit decaying rapidly. Just my thoughts...
To: mdittmar
I can't believe the racism rampant here on these posts. These aren't "black holes", they should be referred to as African-American holes.
To: Tai_Chung
If you are Jeri Ryan resistance isn't even on my list of options.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson