Skip to comments.
Times Co. joins bid for Sox (NY Times to own Red Sox???!!!)
Boston Globe ^
| November 28, 2001
| Meg Vaillancourt
Posted on 11/28/2001 5:54:29 AM PST by Mr. Mulliner
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:07:06 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The New York Times Co. said yesterday that it will enter the bidding war to buy the Boston Red Sox by joining an investment group headed by television producer Tom Werner and skiing entrepreneur Les Otten.
The late addition of the Times Co. to the Werner-Otten group comes as the process to sell the team enters its final phase. As many as seven groups may file formal bids for the team, due by noon tomorrow, in what has become one of the most competitive sales of a franchise in the history of Major League Baseball.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baseballlist
Feel free to post what this world would look like in the pages of the NY Times as part owner of the Red Sox.
To: *Baseball List
index for the baseball bump list
To: LibertyBelt
As a Yankee fan living in the heart of Red Sox territory, perhaps you'd care to comment?
To: Singapore_Yank
Maybe they'd like a farm team in Minnesota, eh ?
To: Eric in the Ozarks
The Twins always were the farm team for the rest of the American League anyway.
To: Singapore_Yank
I don't know. If the NYT owned a baseball team, the entire pitching staff, in order to ensure traditional doctrinal purity, would have to be left handers.
6
posted on
11/28/2001 6:14:31 AM PST
by
Tacis
To: Tacis
LOL!!!
To: Tacis
Heh -- "leftheanders", eh?
And we can just see The New York Times editorial page advocating arresting Yankees fans for "hate crimes" -- cursing at Bosox players at the Stadium...
To: F16Fighter
Tantamount to Armegeddon.
To: Tacis
Im wiping tears from my eyes. LMAO !
To: Singapore_Yank
The Boston Globe is a wholly owned subsidiary of The New York Times. Presumably they would put the Red Sox in that subdivision of their company.
Frankly, I hope they go ahead. Then they would be saddled with an expensive, historical losing team, and they would PO their more sensible New York readers to boot, if there are any such left.
Maybe they can make Maureen Dowd the new manager. I'm sure she'd do a better job a that than what she's doing now.
11
posted on
11/28/2001 6:48:18 AM PST
by
Cicero
To: Singapore_Yank
I think you're on to something.
To: Cicero
And some PC left winger for the TV play by play.
To: Singapore_Yank
"a long-term strategic plan to solidify the Globe's position
as the leading news and advertising medium in New England.Head for the hills, the end of the world draws nigh!
Ya' know, I hate myself already for being addicted to that God-forsaken poor excuse for a baseball team - now this.
If I wasn't a homicidal maniac, I'd probably kill myself.
14
posted on
11/28/2001 8:40:20 AM PST
by
Psalm 73
To: Singapore_Yank
In comparison, contraction no longer seems so bad to this Twins fan.
To: Singapore_Yank
If I remember correctly, the NYT and/or the Boston Globe laid off a bunch of folks a couple months ago.
Now they are buying a baseball team?
It's true once again, liberism only applies to others, it never applies to the liberals themselves.
16
posted on
11/28/2001 10:17:06 AM PST
by
RJL
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson