[doyle]

Here is a real tough question: Which is a more likely reason for the Bush Administration to conform to the same TWA 800 coverup strategy set in place by the Clinton Administration ?:

(A) Both administrations decided to conceal, for diplomatic reasons, a foreign terrorist attack on US citizens on a US airline.

(B) Both administrations decided to conceal, for reasons of national security, a friendly fire accidental shootdown of a US commercial aircraft.

Try not to pick the one you would like to be true.

Pick the one that is most logical.

[LS]

Right. And your radar verification of the missile is . . . where? Why is it that Rivero or NONE of the conspiracy kooks have EVER produced a SINGLE RADAR IMAGE of a missile??? Oh, we don't need that. Their word is good enough. Some red residue on a seat cover that could have been from virtually ANYTHING---except a missile that actually exploded (and which doesn't leave residue like that)is supposed to be a case for a "shoot down." Time to give this one a rest in the same coffin as the Masons, the Rothschilds, and Hangar 18.

[ladyinred]

Since there were witnesses to the shootdown, and George Steff a whats his name said the aircraft was shot down by terrorists, I think I will believe the terrorists shot it down, and that the Clinton administration didn't want us to know for whatever reason.
I do know that following the incident, a commission was formed on airline safety from this kind of thing, headed by Al Gore, which was then ignored after major contributions by the airlines.

Connect the dots.

[Sloth]

Pick the one that is most logical.

Since when are such decisions made logically by the gov't?