Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doyle
Right. And your radar verification of the missile is . . . where? Why is it that Rivero or NONE of the conspiracy kooks have EVER produced a SINGLE RADAR IMAGE of a missile??? Oh, we don't need that. Their word is good enough. Some red residue on a seat cover that could have been from virtually ANYTHING---except a missile that actually exploded (and which doesn't leave residue like that)is supposed to be a case for a "shoot down." Time to give this one a rest in the same coffin as the Masons, the Rothschilds, and Hangar 18.
13 posted on 11/27/2001 2:23:33 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: LS
Right. And your radar verification of the missile is . . . where? Why is it that Rivero or NONE of the conspiracy kooks have EVER produced a SINGLE RADAR IMAGE of a missile???

If that is your standard, you will forever be dissatisfied. Missles, especially the smaller ones that might be launched from a small boat, rarely have enough radar cross section to produce a radar "hit", oh you might get one every ever 10 or more sweeps if the geometry was just right, but then again you might not. They don't carry transponders either, so the only possibility would be a skin paint, and as I said, that is unlikely. Even larger missles, such as Sparrows and AMMRAAMS rarely show up on radar.

19 posted on 11/27/2001 2:31:37 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Right. And your radar verification of the missile is . . . where?

All over the Internet for anyone who cares to look.

They're on Rivero's site someplace. (I'd supply a link but I get the feeling you wouldn't look anyway, for some strange reason.) Ian Goddard has posted them. Paris Match has published them. Kallstrom et al. call these images (Note the "s." There's more than one, and they move in a time sequence on a collision course with the TWA 800 radar returns.) on ATC radar "anomalies."

ML/NJ

25 posted on 11/27/2001 3:06:21 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Unless I misread something, the red residue is consistent with military rocket motors and was tested by Jim Sanders.
37 posted on 11/27/2001 7:53:38 PM PST by fliberman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: LS
I suppose you can believe the likes of Kallstrom who maintain that the "DIESEL FUEL" in the center fuel tank exploded, (I heard him say this on O'Reilly. We all know that jet engines burn diesel fuel...NOT!!!!!!)

Visit TWA 800 Investigation Site

The missiles, the witnesses the cover up are all linked/posted. Try reading what George Stephanopolus and Sen Kerry have to say about the "bombing" of TWA 800.

96 posted on 12/04/2001 9:16:11 AM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson