Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It appears to me that the fix was in and that TWA was "on board" from the get go.

Why can't the politico's just tell us the truth? The Stingers that the Taliban are alleged to be missing have been used against our own airlines. The FBI and CIA were sleeping at the gate and for "national security" reasons we aren't supposed to know the truth.

Kick me gently - this is my first post.

1 posted on 11/27/2001 1:52:03 PM PST by sandydipper (sandidipir@aol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sandydipper
Totally believable. Thanks for posting it.
But who is Fred? Your friend?
2 posted on 11/27/2001 1:56:10 PM PST by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
Just one more item on the massive pile of evidence that TWA 800 was shot down. Thanks for the post.
4 posted on 11/27/2001 2:02:02 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
My personal conclusion is that TWA Flight 800 was shot down but that the most recent crash was an accident.

Your post is one more straw in the wind, and I suppose some enterprising news person could follow up on it to see where the President of TWA was at the time and whether he visited the White House as claimed. But without names and corroborating facts, it doesn't mean very much.

Clinton covered up and lied reflexively, and the media were happy to back him to the hilt. I won't say that Bush wouldn't cover up if he thought there was good reason to do so, but so far I think the evidence is the other way.

5 posted on 11/27/2001 2:02:57 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
"3rd Party," huh? Sounds like "hearsay" then.

This is such steaming, REEKING BULLSH*T!

8 posted on 11/27/2001 2:12:39 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
Here is a real tough question: Which is a more likely reason for the Bush Administration to conform to the same TWA 800 coverup strategy set in place by the Clinton Administration ?:

(A) Both administrations decided to conceal, for diplomatic reasons, a foreign terrorist attack on US citizens on a US airline.

(B) Both administrations decided to conceal, for reasons of national security, a friendly fire accidental shootdown of a US commercial aircraft.

Try not to pick the one you would like to be true.

Pick the one that is most logical.

10 posted on 11/27/2001 2:18:17 PM PST by doyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
The x42 and staff perfected cover up, I hope more people will come forward to expose the fraud who thought he was king.
11 posted on 11/27/2001 2:20:51 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
It was reported at the time that the President of TWA was taken to the Pentagon the next day. One other report said the government bought a new plane for TWA. I have nothing to support any of that except that I remember reading it at the time.
16 posted on 11/27/2001 2:27:28 PM PST by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
I had heard the following from a senior TWA mechanic about 6 months after the shoot down (oops, incident) so take it as company gossip. The White House had the new TWA president (2 months in the job) in for a three hour session on the day following the crash. When he left the White House, he looked like had been through the 5th degree grilling and he wouldn't tell anyone anything within the corporation. He resigned a week later which surprised everyone because he had promised the share holders an aggressive two year restructuring program just the previous month.
31 posted on 11/27/2001 4:55:15 PM PST by Traction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
Stingers? Need something with more range than that, to have gotten Flt 800. Now maybe if the USN was having a live fire drill somewhere off the coast. Example, the Ukraine zapped a Russian plane doing that very thing.
33 posted on 11/27/2001 7:39:17 PM PST by vladog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
Well, we have "a commercial pilot who spoke to another commercial pilot who spoke to Fred."

With an impeccable source such as this, the case can now be closed.

41 posted on 11/28/2001 5:37:26 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
They told us the truth..A wiring problem, yeah, that's it!Move along, folks, nothing to see here...
59 posted on 12/01/2001 1:38:19 PM PST by placebo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
The stinger missile is only about 5 feet. Moslems Taliban sold it to Moslem Iran? or some other Moslem country. Countries are allowed to bring things to their overseas embasies without submission to search. It is called the DIPLOMATIC POUCH. So, from the Iranian embassy, for example, a van can be loaded and drive to any place in the USA. Now if that is the case, what is going to stop the brief case nuclear bombs?
78 posted on 12/03/2001 7:33:22 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
dip,

Why do you take advantage of people's tragic deaths to drag out conspiracy theories? It's a lot of nonsense, and no one's buying it.

90 posted on 12/04/2001 5:45:50 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
I heard that it was George Bush (x41) that flew to Paris to meet with Iranian officials...wait, that was October Surprise, my tinfoil must be off kilter. Let me get my hat and meds straightened out and I'll be right back...
100 posted on 12/04/2001 11:17:58 AM PST by Leesylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
Why can't the politico's just tell us the truth?

Duh...

Klintoon was in the White House then. You aren't so naive to think ANYONE associated with him could even be capable of uttering even a smidgeon of truth, are you?

128 posted on 12/06/2001 1:34:45 PM PST by Norb2569
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
If it had been shot down, there would have been a clear IR picture seen by CLINTON-haters in C-Springs - no WAY kept secret.
209 posted on 12/10/2001 6:23:50 PM PST by BamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sandydipper
Your initial post is likely true that TWA knew early on that FLT800 was shot down. TWA president Erickson was rather upset to say the least at his first press exposures. His later departure was undoubtedly connected. Since both TWA and Boeing must operate with the government's blessing, they have to show agreement to stay in business. Any threats of showing favor to Airbus have been discarded lately with the A300 falling apart in flight. One principal conclusion is that OUR NTSB IS EITHER INCOMPETENT OR UNTRUTHFUL. There is no other way to put it. The public gets the government that they are willing to put up with. There is no time like the present to stop putting up with either incompetence or untruthfulness.
255 posted on 12/13/2001 10:50:23 AM PST by barf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson