[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Another thing I wonder his Jim's explanation for the orange RDX chemical found on seat cushions in the wreckage. I wonder if he can comprehend how difficult it is to manufacture that US grade military explosive? I heard the head investigator fess up about the RDX chemical to Trafficant in an early hearing. True, Trafficant later said it wasn't a coverup. But I think they convinced Trafficant that it's best not to give terrorists credit for any kills. It's a powerful argument. Freegards....

[Excuse_Me]

Another thing I wonder his Jim's explanation for the orange RDX chemical found on seat cushions in the wreckage. I wonder if he can comprehend how difficult it is to manufacture that US grade military explosive? I heard the head investigator fess up about the RDX chemical to Trafficant in an early hearing. True, Trafficant later said it wasn't a coverup. But I think they convinced Trafficant that it's best not to give terrorists credit for any kills. It's a powerful argument. Freegards....

My opinion is that it was not a terrorist attack, but that they convinced enquiring Congress Critters that it was. The lack of reaction by naval vessels in the area, and the position of the triangulated firing sites well outside of the area where flights could be expected to be within range, would preclude a terrorist attack with MANPADS. The friendly fire explanations are more logical.

[_Jim]

Another thing I wonder his Jim's explanation for the orange RDX chemical found on seat cushions in the wreckage.

You apparently have me confused with somebody else who may have taken issue with this particular point.

Unless you can find a specific post on a thread here at FR you are either:

1. hallucinating or
2. making things up.