Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can we distinguish between Islam and Christianity
Miscellaneous | November 23, 2001 | John J. Abele

Posted on 11/23/2001 7:18:23 AM PST by RealGem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-460 next last
To: hinckley buzzard
buzz:
What is it with you and the "Najran Christians?" This is 2001, and I don't know how they figure into the issues of today.

But you keep dredging them up, so maybe you could explain what relevance they have to the World Trade Center atrocities and the AlQaeda-led Islamic war against humanity?

kangharue:
The problem with the Islamic world is that have too many anti-thinking/anti-intellectual type people like you running the show. Can you imagine the state of the US if people such as yourself assumed absolute power? It would be a hell on earth.

381 posted on 11/24/2001 1:47:45 AM PST by KanghaRue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: RealGem
Whatever one might think of this fellow's argument, his Latin could use some work. "Novus ordo seclorum" doesn't mean "a new order has begun;" it's not even a full sentence, as it lacks a verb. It translates as "[a] new order of [the] ages" (Latin doesn't have words corresponding to "a", "an," or "the"). For that mattter, "annuit coeptis" is borrowed from Virgil; I've seen it translated as "he approves of the beginnings," but the subject is only specified as to number and person by the verb form, and could as well be "she" or "it" as "he" in the absence of context.
382 posted on 11/24/2001 2:09:34 AM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
That describes religion in the late 4th century and early 5th century Arabia before Mohammed in the Time of Ignorance.
383 posted on 11/24/2001 4:16:39 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
As I Christian I would not presume to second guess God's plan. I accept that HE must have had something in mind when with Judiasm and Islam.

In any I case I think it is a mistake to ridicule and demean another's faith in God particularly when there are more similarities than differences.

384 posted on 11/24/2001 4:20:48 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
If you mean can there be bad Muslims? Of course.. just as there are bad Christians and bad Jews.
385 posted on 11/24/2001 4:24:01 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
I have never done drugs either so I can't tell you about that, but I have lived in Muslim countries and Christians are treated with kindness and respect.
386 posted on 11/24/2001 4:31:27 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Islam has no relation to the WTC attack. OBL is an aberration. He is a terrorist who has twisted and used religion. People who teach hate in God's name and do evil things to their fellow man generally do that... and I mean that in the broadest sense.
387 posted on 11/24/2001 4:38:00 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"The mystery of that is what separates the Christian from the pagan, moslem, atheist, agnostic, Jeffersonian Deist, whatever form of ignorance and faithlessness you choose to identify with. This is the simple rock that trips up shallow infidels like a_Turk. And you, I guess."

You left out Judiasm.

388 posted on 11/24/2001 4:42:08 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
"Good Muslims, like good libs, are quick to say "Oh yeah, that Jesus guy was a good teacher."

Sorry.Muslims call Jesus the Messiah.

Muslims respect and revere Jesus.

They consider him one of the greatest of God's prophets and messengers to humankind. A Muslim never refers to him simply as "Jesus", but always adds the phrase "upon him be peace." The Qur'an confirms his virgin birth, and a special surah of the Qur'an is entitled "Mary." The Qur'an describes the Annunciation as follows:

"'Behold (O Mary!)' The Angel said, 'God has chosen you, and purified you, and chosen you above the women of all nations.

O Mary, God gives you good news of a word from Him, whose name shall be the Anointed (Masih or Messiah), Jesus son of Mary, honored in this world and in the hereafter, and one of those brought near to God. He shall speak to the people from his cradle and in maturity, and shall be of the righteous.'

389 posted on 11/24/2001 4:45:54 AM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
Emperor Constantine convened the Council of Nicea for political reasons (go where the votes are), and the bishops got together and argued about this and that and came up with things like the doctrine of the trinity (which is self-evident when one actually reads the Gospels).

Thank you for a concise exposition of this moment in history.

Unfortunately, it does not answer the original question, "Is it possible, that the sources you site --- The Books of Acts, Chapters 1 & 2 in the New Testament for the words of Christ and the words of the apostles --- are not conclusive on this subject?"

The mere facts that:

(i) Christians read these sources for centuries without coming to the conclusion adopted at Nicea;
(ii) it took several Councils, not one, at which the most learned members of the Church argued the matter without resolving it,
(iii) even after the Nicean Council there remained for centuries large numbers of Christians who rejected the conclusions of Nicea (of course, the Church has promptly called this descent a "sect," much like many people on this board feel freely to call any religion other than Christianity a "cult").
prove that the Nicean Doctrine is not self-evident as you suggest, and does not by itself follow from the sources you sited.

Observe that in your post you followed the now standard practice of reciting history and then merely declaring some fact as self-evident. I wish all matters were so simple, but...

390 posted on 11/24/2001 6:59:10 AM PST by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
If Jesus is God in the flesh, then we all are.

Well, thanks at least, for being honest, and for the invite. I have no doubt about your sincerity, but I can't handle that statement about all of us being a little god. That is Hindu theology. Oh well, have a nice forever.

Later on.

391 posted on 11/24/2001 7:14:29 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
If Jesus is God in the flesh, then we all are. There is no exclusivity in God's Kingdom, only in the kingdoms of men.

How do you understand and explain these words of Jesus Christ?

"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." Matthew 7:14

"All things are delivered to me of my Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him." Luke 10:22

"But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead." Matthew 8:22

"When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are: Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets. But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out." Luke 13:28

392 posted on 11/24/2001 7:30:21 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: KanghaRue
It's a result of stripping religion of its power. Not necessarily. Secularization is essentially an intolerant process, and only Christianity has prevented the elitesd who espouse it from forcing society into a worship of the state. Two very different forms of Christianity profited from the destruction of the old State Church order: the evangelicals and the papacy. Each is hated by the seculat elites primarily because of the affections that masses of the people have for each.
393 posted on 11/24/2001 8:01:33 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
This reading allows for a co-existence between Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
That's what is supposet to happen.
I just wonder which sects within Islam are most open to this view.
Ignorance does not run along the lines of any sect, just like it does not in Christianity and Judaism.
394 posted on 11/24/2001 8:30:08 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Are you a Clintonoid in deep cover by any chance? You have the ethics of Billyboy.
please do not revert to name calling. Go back to the playground if you must act like an immature child.
395 posted on 11/24/2001 8:32:32 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
When dealing with spiritual realities, I'll go the original source material IN THE BIBLE and base my belief on what is found there.
396 posted on 11/24/2001 8:33:30 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Answer his frickin' question, TURK.

Leave out the weasel words, and the "Etc, Etc," because we know from your pal Clinton, you can cover a lot of turds with those little words.

Too bad for you, we already had 8 years of a lying psychopath. To get us tuned up--for the likes of you.
I am going to ignore you from now on. You have an abusive character.
397 posted on 11/24/2001 8:35:29 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Perhaps I am one of the annoying Christians who would have to has his mind changed at the end of a scimitar.
398 posted on 11/24/2001 8:40:26 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
You don't understand Christianity. Wherever your "understanding" of Christianity came from, it obviously is not from reading the Bible
There are those Christians to whom the status of Jesus as God is more important than His deeds and words of wisdom. Those to me are superficial Christians, but that's just me.

My understanding of Christianity came from the Bible, and my understanding of Christians came from everyday life. The same is true of my understanding of Islam.

Most of you Christians and Muslims cling to imagery of grandure. Very few of you actually understand what's beneath the surface, the appreciation of which leads to a belief of substance.
399 posted on 11/24/2001 8:45:22 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
The cornerstone of our faith is Christ as God and Savior crucified and resurrected for the sins of all mankind.

Any Christian who doesn't believe that might be a nice, moral, religious person, but he's not a Christian.

400 posted on 11/24/2001 9:12:19 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-460 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson