Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA unleashes new threat to human babies
American Life League, Inc. ^ | Release issued 21 Nov 01

Posted on 11/22/2001 10:59:38 PM PST by toenail

FDA unleashes new threat to human babies

"In the midst of a terror campaign and a frightening battle against anthrax, the FDA has somehow been able to find the time to sanction yet another form of baby killing," said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. "The newly-approved birth control patch uses the same abortion-causing chemicals used in many other so-called contraceptives."

With its approval of the birth control patch, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has now approved its fourth new "contraceptive" option in the last year. The skin patch has been added to a collection that already includes a monthly injection, a hormone-emitting IUD, and a hormone-emitting contraceptive ring.

"All these devices deliver the same hormones to the woman's body and all work in the same manner," said Mrs. Brown. "They all affect the uterine lining and prevent implantation of a newly-conceived human being, thus causing the end of that human being's life."

"The FDA should be ashamed of itself," said Mrs. Brown. "All Americans should reject this new form of baby killing and seek to protect all innocent human life, from fertilization to natural death."

Release issued: 21 Nov 01

©2001 American Life League, Inc.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-407 next last
To: pcl
Brad's Gramma is against *free choice*? Interesting how it's okay for you to have free choice in believing whatever you want to believe but it's NOT okay for BG to belive what SHE wants to believe.

How intolerant of you.

61 posted on 11/23/2001 10:27:25 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pcl; Artist
A two week old fetus, as you call it, has a heartbeat. What do you make of that? Still a blob?

For the record...most abortions are performed between 6-12 weeks. If there's a heartbeat by 10 days just imagine what else is developed by 6-12 weeks.

62 posted on 11/23/2001 10:29:02 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Artist
bump
63 posted on 11/23/2001 10:30:05 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: pcl
I asked: "So how have you determined that a two week old fetus is not a person?"

You answered: "I have observed that you anti-abortionists do not treat a two week old miscarriage like a person. You flush them down the toilet. If you truely belived the two week old fetus to be a person, you would treat it like a person."

Your answer seems to be that a two week old miscarried baby deserves a funeral I guess, but since they don't get one, they must not be human beings. Since pro-life people don't have funerals for early miscarriages, they really don't think they were carrying a baby.

I can assure you that pro-life people mourn the loss of their miscarried babies and depending on the stage of development, some do have funerals. Maybe they don't do it in a way that satisfies you. If they did have a funeral and a burial, would you then be convinced that the 2 week old fetus is a human person deserving protection? Would that make you pro-life?

It seems like you are trying to justify your pro-abortion position by pointing out a perceived hypocrasy on the part of pro-lifers. Since pro-lifers don't behave they way you think they should, you must be right in thinking its ok to intentionally kill the unborn.

Husband of Artist

64 posted on 11/23/2001 10:31:51 PM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pcl
If they abort a fetus in the first three months of pregnancy it is not killing a baby human. It is killing a fetus which has the potential to become a baby human.

Ha ha ha. Nice use of language: "I don't eat flesh, I eat meat." In Latin, "fetus" means "filled with young, pregnant, breeding, with young". The nature of the young is taken for granted as being the same as that which it is filling. The duck fetus is duck. The aardvark fetus is aardvark. The human fetus is human. In English, "fetus" is most often used to mean "that with which a [human] woman is pregnant but which itself is not [yet] human". Thus, the question has been begged and the conclusion wrapped into a word which is then employed in a certain way as to justify an action whose merit has not yet been demonstrated. What is it, other than an arbitrary decree by you, that the individual organism before, but not after, the passage of three months is only potentially, but not actually, human? Is it merely the passage of time or the development that occurs during that passage of time? Are you defining 'its' humanity by its appearance or by the organism's ability to "do" something? If so, demonstrate how your conclusion follows from the nature of the organism rather than from your own definitions. Isn't it more than a little suspicious that it is a definition that you make that allows you, without compunction, to interrupt, to your own advantage, the process of continual development of a genetically unique individual that eventually would become someone--if not deliberately prevented from doing so--who would be in the position of doing the same thing to you? If it has nothing to do with what he actually is at this particular stage in his development, is it the fact of his complete inabilty to live on his own that makes him only potentially human? If that individual at a later stage in his life eventually were supporting you at the end of a rope over a chasm, would he then be perfectly justified in releasing the rope because you were totally dependent upon him for your life and unable to do anything about it?
65 posted on 11/23/2001 10:55:00 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
Roe v Wade was flawed legal reasoning and should be overturned

That would be a shattering blow to freedom and a very dark day for this country.

Think of all the women you would be killing by forcing them into coat hanger abortion apartments. Have you now compassion for life?

66 posted on 11/23/2001 10:56:40 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Artist
Please see #65.
67 posted on 11/23/2001 10:57:48 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: niki
I took it out

and did what?

You are a fool if you expect me to believe the majority of the early term miscarriages of anti-abortionist do not go down the toilet.

68 posted on 11/23/2001 10:59:46 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: pcl; Artist
Think of all the women you would be killing by forcing them into coat hanger abortion apartments. Have you now compassion for life?

Think of all the babies you actually are killing by forcing them into nice, bright, clean abortion clinics. Have you no compassion for life? In either case, hospital or back-alley abortion, the woman is exercising her choice. It's just that in the back-alley type, she is marginally more likely to suffer the same fate as her unborn child. She still has choice. The unborn child still has none. Have you no compassion for life?
69 posted on 11/23/2001 11:04:43 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
You however, seem to have a great disdain for the Creator.

Not at all. I have great respect for the Creator.

I do have disdain for the myths about the Christian god and the fairy tales in the book you call the bible.

I do have distain for all the killing that has been done in the name of your god.

I do have distain for all of the followers of your god who feel justified in enslaving the rest of mankind.

I do have distain for people who attack me and call me names in the name of your god.

I do not have distain for people who homeschool their kids. We have homeschooled our all our kids.

70 posted on 11/23/2001 11:07:42 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Women who miscarry at two weeks conception usually don't realize their even pregnant. I miscarried at approximately 7 weeks and then again at 3-1/2 months. My babies were given names and were cremated.

I respect that. I truely do. That fact that you have stood by your belief gives me the greatest respect for you. While I do not believe you can change my opinons, you are one person to whom I will listen closely.

You have my deepest sympathy for the loss of your two children.

71 posted on 11/23/2001 11:11:33 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
but it's NOT okay for BG to belive what SHE wants to believe.

I have no problem with her believing anything she wants. I do have a problem when she tries to force her beliefs upon others.

72 posted on 11/23/2001 11:17:02 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Artist
If they did have a funeral and a burial, would you then be convinced that the 2 week old fetus is a human person deserving protection?

No. But I would believe that YOU believed what you are preaching.

73 posted on 11/23/2001 11:19:00 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I can not understand your post. Must be my age. Reading all those words run together does not work for me. I will say this:

If they abort a fetus in the first three months of pregnancy it is not killing a baby human. It is killing a fetus which has the potential to become a baby human.

74 posted on 11/23/2001 11:22:59 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
She still has choice

Not if you have your way. You want to take away her choice. remember?

75 posted on 11/23/2001 11:27:48 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: pcl; Artist
1. You are a fool if you expect me to believe the majority of the early term miscarriages of anti-abortionist do not go down the toilet.

2. I have observed that you anti-abortionists do not treat a two week old miscarriage like a person. You flush them down the toilet.

pcl, in #2, you said you knew this; you stated it as a fact that you have observed. Now you're saying in #1 that you "believe" this. This evidently is the problem: you are unable to distinguish between what you believe to be true and what actually is, all on its own, true. This also happens to be at the root of so many of life's problems. It is something that good parents strive to teach their children: Simply the fact that they want something is not sufficient warrant for them to have it or to try to obtain it. Their desire is subject to other considerations, many of which lie completely outside the realm of their "choice". The best education a child can receive is to learn that his will is not the end all and be all of existence. His will is not the axis around which the world spins. Some, unfortunately, have not learned this. Some are called spoiled brats. Some are called juvenile delinquents. Some are called bank robbers, murderers, or Supreme Leaders of the Fatherland. They are all pro-choice and the underlying psychology is the same: Me first at all costs.

Supermarket Morality
or
If I don't like it, I can always take it back
Too bizarre to be mistaken for anything else but the condition of a diseased spirit is the dichotomy of thought manifested in the appeal, on the one hand, to the poor, illiterate, unloved, socially-disadvantaged, abused and abusing bastard of incestuous rape who will only be an additional drain on an already overpopulated planet unless he/she/it should first agonizingly die from a genetic defect inherited from parents too selfish and insensitive toward it, toward themselves, and toward the welfare of society to prevent its suffering by means of a "therapeutic" abortion; and, on the other hand, to Noble Woman, guardian and embodiment of Constitutional virtue, struggling to protect herself from the advances of a rapacious, patriarchal religion and society, to cast off the biological shackles slapped on her by a cruel and unjust evolution.

It is a rationale designed to justify any choice and to silence any criticism. It is an awfully big gun to pull out for something they allege to be merely a medical decision between a woman and her physician. To remove or not to remove a wart is a decision on that level.

And here is where the slip shows--although they claim (or want to believe) that the act of abortion is nothing, attempting to prevent, to limit, or even to talk first about their doing it is everything.

"Hey! Get the hell off of my will! Just who do you think you are to attempt to even think about imposing your morality on me? Besides, can't you see how much I'm suffering?" they say while imposing something far more severe than morality on those who literally depend on them for life.

To put it even more into perspective, imagine a bumper sticker reading: My fetus was chosen Unviable Tissue Mass of the Month at the Me-First Womyn's Health Center.

Even lab animals get more consideration.

Abortion is a denial. It is a denial of nature, of responsibility, of self-sacrifice, of love, and of life. And what is left? A will whose choices are unobstructed by any of the above.

"Well, that's done," they say, turning to pat and admire the shape of their uncoerced will. "Maybe I'll take this sweater back today, too."

76 posted on 11/23/2001 11:30:12 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: pcl
...an outdated morality.

Morality has no expiration date.

77 posted on 11/23/2001 11:36:00 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pcl
...the freedom of women to control their reproductive functions..

How about the freedom of defenseless babies? They will never enjoy a single bit of freedom.

Without life, it is impossible to experience liberty.

78 posted on 11/23/2001 11:39:05 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pcl
I will admit that it is not clear when a fetus becomes a human. In my mind it is somewhere between month 3 and month 6.

In your mind? Wow. What a powerful argument. Not.

79 posted on 11/23/2001 11:41:30 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Some are called juvenile delinquents. Some are called bank robbers, murderers, or Supreme Leaders of the Fatherland.

And some are called anti-free choicers.

All of those mentioned do things to hurt other people. When you take the stand that a woman does not have a free choice you hurt that woman.

80 posted on 11/23/2001 11:48:40 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson