Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA unleashes new threat to human babies
American Life League, Inc. ^ | Release issued 21 Nov 01

Posted on 11/22/2001 10:59:38 PM PST by toenail

FDA unleashes new threat to human babies

"In the midst of a terror campaign and a frightening battle against anthrax, the FDA has somehow been able to find the time to sanction yet another form of baby killing," said Judie Brown, president of American Life League. "The newly-approved birth control patch uses the same abortion-causing chemicals used in many other so-called contraceptives."

With its approval of the birth control patch, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has now approved its fourth new "contraceptive" option in the last year. The skin patch has been added to a collection that already includes a monthly injection, a hormone-emitting IUD, and a hormone-emitting contraceptive ring.

"All these devices deliver the same hormones to the woman's body and all work in the same manner," said Mrs. Brown. "They all affect the uterine lining and prevent implantation of a newly-conceived human being, thus causing the end of that human being's life."

"The FDA should be ashamed of itself," said Mrs. Brown. "All Americans should reject this new form of baby killing and seek to protect all innocent human life, from fertilization to natural death."

Release issued: 21 Nov 01

©2001 American Life League, Inc.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 401-407 next last
To: Marathon Man
P.S. At the very least, won't you agree that companies and organizations marketing a "contraceptive" that frequently works as an abortifacient is committing a vile and nasty fraud, when they don't manifestly inform the consumer that the product sometimes works in such a way that they may find morally abhorrent?
201 posted on 11/25/2001 2:45:49 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: toenail
You can try to ignore this but you must figure a way to reconcile your professed libertarianism with your belief that the needs of one trump the freedom of another.
202 posted on 11/25/2001 3:25:13 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: pcl
Sorry, it says no serious injury, it does not say just to the wife. To me this clearly means any serious injury to either.
203 posted on 11/25/2001 3:56:51 PM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Republic
This is an interesting point. If a woman is raped, does she have the right to an abortion? To me the answer is simple, NO. For some reason God intended the woman to be pregnant, that is not to say that rape is right in any way shape or form.

There are many unwanted children who grew up to be very intelligent and prove to be of great value to society, I wish I could remember a name but I am at a loss at the moment.

Pregnancy is a wonderful, God given right for women. What a gloroius thing, to help produce life (only God produces life with the help of women and men). Why would anyone ever wish to stop this blessing?

Loose morals should not be an excuse for murder, EVER!

204 posted on 11/25/2001 4:05:59 PM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
"You can try to ignore this but you must figure a way to reconcile your professed libertarianism with your belief that the needs of one trump the freedom of another."

I saw that someone else had already responded and didn't feel the need to add anything else, but I will later tonight. The living room wall is just calling to be painted....

205 posted on 11/25/2001 4:07:39 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: wwjdn
A life, is a life, is a life, and so forth!
206 posted on 11/25/2001 4:31:47 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
... needs of one trump the freedom of another. posted by Free the USA Courts do it all the time and pay little heed to it because law has become (perhaps always has been) transactional in nature where civil law is practiced, that's why they're called 'rulings'.
207 posted on 11/25/2001 4:47:15 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: pcl
homeschoolmama said:

I miscarried at approximately 7 weeks and then again at 3-1/2 months. My babies were given names and were cremated.

Your response:

"...You have my deepest sympathy for the loss of your two children."

Then you say: "If they abort a fetus in the first three months of pregnancy it is not killing a baby human. "

So what I conclude from that is that if a woman has a miscarrage at 7 weeks (baby less than 2 months old in the womb) then it is a baby, and you express sorrow at that loss.

But if a woman has an abortion at 2 months and 30.9 days, it is not a child?

Hmmmmmmm

208 posted on 11/25/2001 5:35:24 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
But if a woman has an abortion at 2 months and 30.9 days, it is not a child?

YOU GOT IT!!!!!! You're starting to figure things out!!!! I AM KIDDING!!!!!

When my child came to me telling me of the pregnancy..oh never mind. These people are so narrow minded and blinded by Satan it's pathetic.

209 posted on 11/25/2001 5:45:39 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
LOL well what I got was HIM.

I wonder if he will respond to his getting caught (with his own words) in his massive hippocracy?

210 posted on 11/25/2001 5:47:35 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Ok, you insist on reading Exodus wrong. I am not surprised.

I am still interested to see how your cognitive dissonance is going to deal with Num. 5:11-31.

211 posted on 11/25/2001 5:51:03 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: wwjdn
This is an interesting point. If a woman is raped, does she have the right to an abortion? To me the answer is simple, NO. For some reason God intended the woman to be pregnant, that is not to say that rape is right in any way shape or form.

There are many unwanted children who grew up to be very intelligent and prove to be of great value to society, I wish I could remember a name but I am at a loss at the moment.

Well Ethyl Waters, the famous Gospel singer, wasn't unwanted. But her mother was raped when she was a teenager, and Miss Waters was a WANTED baby even though concieved by a rape.

And she is a great addition to mankind.

212 posted on 11/25/2001 5:51:12 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: pcl
Hi! How ya doin'?????? I got the ironing done. Now I have to fold some clothes yet....Hope you're having a good day. BG
213 posted on 11/25/2001 5:54:23 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Dear Hmmmmmmm,

Read the posts carefully. I was acknowledging that SHE believed her first trimester misscarriage was a true human in all respects. Given that is what SHE believes, I am sympathetic for her loss.

It is called compassion. I can be compassionate to her beliefs without giving up my own. You might try it some time.

214 posted on 11/25/2001 5:57:30 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: pcl
Given that is what SHE believes, I am sympathetic for her loss.

Loss of WHAT?

215 posted on 11/25/2001 5:58:52 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: pcl
"If they abort a fetus in the first three months of pregnancy it is not killing a baby human. It is killing a fetus which has the potential to become a baby human."

Do you really believe this? Tell me exactly when the unborn person changes from fetus to a baby.What is the precise moment that this occurs? How do we know when it is a fetus....or it is a baby? Is there a test?

216 posted on 11/25/2001 6:06:36 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pcl
I can be compassionate to her beliefs without giving up my own.

Well the point here is your hypocritical statements.

You offered your compassion for her CHILD (your word), and that child was a 7 week old fetus.

Something , some where down, waaayyy down in the recesses of your being wanted to aknowledge that a 7 week old fetus is a HUMAN child. That is so nice. Let it out....

So glad to see you give up your beliefs for a small second there...

Oh and thanks for the suggestion for me to try compassion...I think I will take you up on that...

217 posted on 11/25/2001 6:31:33 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: hove
According to pcl's own words, a fetus is a child at 7 weeks, but not as baby til 3 months.

???????????

Hard to figure people like that...see my post #208...

218 posted on 11/25/2001 6:34:51 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
According to pcl's own words, a fetus is a child at 7 weeks, but not a baby til 3 months.

Yeah! I get it! NOT!!!!!

219 posted on 11/25/2001 6:39:20 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: wwjdn
There are many unwanted children who grew up to be very intelligent and prove to be of great value to society

Of course, there are also an equally large number of absolutely worthless people (or at least people who don't contribute anything of real value) who are born as well. Hypothetical value is a pretty weak argument for the pro-life position; at the very least, there are much better arguments. I consider a non-trivial fraction of people alive today to be a net loss on the human balance sheet.

220 posted on 11/25/2001 7:02:27 PM PST by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson