To: Gracey
A structural biologist would probably not be the first choice of a terrorist looking for help making weapons of mass destruction.
5 posted on
11/20/2001 11:12:12 AM PST by
tgiles
To: tgiles
Thanks for the input but I don't understand enough regarding types of biologists.
However, it seems to me that someone was in the car with him and made him get out - enter another vehicle. Perhaps the location would make it seem like suicide.
6 posted on
11/20/2001 11:14:55 AM PST by
Gracey
To: tgiles
A structural biologist would probably not be the first choice of a terrorist looking for help making weapons of mass destruction Unless it was one who had worked with Visna in particular, say back around 1980-'85.
-archy-/-
7 posted on
11/20/2001 11:17:00 AM PST by
archy
To: tgiles
"A structural biologist would not be first choice for a terrorist..."
Probably true, but would not a structural biologist be important to developing counter measures to bio terror. Sort of like taking an all star linebacker off the field at game time. Just a thought.
To: tgiles
What does a structural biologist study?
11 posted on
11/20/2001 11:19:18 AM PST by
motexva
To: tgiles
"A structural biologist would probably not be the first choice of a terrorist looking for help making weapons of mass destruction." Is that something a terrorist would know, though? How many people have even heard the term "structural biologist"? I don't think I've ever seen it until I read this thread. Is it possible that a terrorist outfit would see the list of diseases the guy worked with, and decide he's just what they need, and then proceed to kidnap him?
72 posted on
11/20/2001 9:55:57 PM PST by
Don Joe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson