Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What has happened to Free Republic
Me | Me

Posted on 11/19/2001 2:03:57 PM PST by FF578

Has anyone noticed that the Liberal influence has spread here into Free Republic. I notice that less and less Conservatives seem to post here, and more and more Libertarians seem to be.

I get a letter from someone named NYpeanut who is mad because I posted a discussion based on the Gender Gap in voting.

I didn't make it up, there is really a huge Gender gap with Female Voters tending toward the more liberal candidate. The discussion went well without name calling, but this person seems to have taken issue to the fact that I pointed out women seem to vote more liberally than men.

All those who are newbies here are considered disruptors, and those who hold a more right-winged view than the average libertarian seem to be kicked out.

Why is this? Is this a Libertarian site now?

I have noticed more and more posters standing up for Abortion, Homosexuality, the Porn Industry and Drugs since I first came to this site back before the 2000 Election.

Are Christian Conservatives(Who make up a large part of the Republican core vote) not allowed here anymore?

Just because one holds to a higher power, and wishes to shape society in accordance with the laws of Almighty God, does not make one a Taliban Milita member.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 801-820 next last
To: Gracey
#580 oops...

A Born Again Christian who supports a Pro-Abortion candidate - no way...never happen!

601 posted on 11/19/2001 7:44:02 PM PST by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: bluefish
I am anti war on drugs, and you have utterly failed to identify my motivation for being so.

Let's see if I can guess your motivation:

1. You want to be able to take illegal drugs.

2. You think that the Federal Government is too overreaching and abusive in the war on drugs and so drugs should be legalized.

3. You think that too much crime is caused by illegal drugs.

Which one? 1, 2, 3 or all of the above?

602 posted on 11/19/2001 7:45:05 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I do know that to be conservative not to very long ago meant that you agreed with religious people more than leftists

First of all, the "hard drinking" rebels that founded the country called themselves "liberals." Even the fundies amongst them, like Patrick Henry were not "conservatives" of the time. The "liberal" fundies and rationalists that founded our nation embraced the radically "liberal" notion at the time of toleration of all religions--fundie and otherwise.

The conservatives at the time of the founding were loyal to old political ideas of the time like monarchy and a state church.

At the beginning of the 20th century, the meanings of the political terms "liberal" and "conservative" reversed themselves with regard to fundie-religion. The hard drinking "conservatives" like Mencken opposed the "liberal" church lady prohibitionist reformers.

Sometime during World War II, the next group of Americans to call themselves "conservatives" re-adopted fundie religion, empire, and declared war on communism.

The last good Americans to call themselves liberals were around at the time of the founding and the last good Americans to call themselves "conservatives" were around at the turn of the century. Hence, the terms "classical liberal" and "paleo-conservative.""

603 posted on 11/19/2001 7:45:12 PM PST by Libertarian Billy Graham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
can't we leave the bible out...? this is a political discussion.

excuse me. when life begins is a legitimate question that people have. i used the bible as a reference to support my beliefs. abortionists can rarely quote a source to support their beliefs. i interpret this to mean that they believe abortion is a convenience.

our founding fathers referred to the bible often to help them govern. if we as a people would do the same today, we would find that we would have less government interfering with our lives.

with freedom comes responsibility.

604 posted on 11/19/2001 7:45:34 PM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: GreatOne; yall
Sour grapes. Your high minded 'discussion' ended with you calling me silly names, because you couldn't counter my arguments. The proof is in on the thread, here:

Ashcroft's moral stand out of line

Address:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/573251/posts?q=1&&page=101

605 posted on 11/19/2001 7:45:44 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: sirgawain
Well.... Yeah.
606 posted on 11/19/2001 7:47:16 PM PST by StoneColdGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
At the beginning of the 20th century, the meanings of the political terms "liberal" and "conservative" reversed themselves with regard to fundie-religion. The hard drinking "conservatives" like Mencken opposed the "liberal" church lady prohibitionist reformers

The issue isn't what labels we put on people, but what they believe. John F. Kennedy would be a conservative by todays standards. The founding fathers would be homophobic, extreme right wing nuts on the FBI's terrorist list.

607 posted on 11/19/2001 7:48:38 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: FF578
only a moron cannot distinguish between libertarian and liberal ... sheeesh
608 posted on 11/19/2001 7:49:24 PM PST by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
What is bestiality? Doesn't sound appetizing. Kiddy porn? No way? We're talking about what ADULTS do. Anything in moderation is no one else's business, as long as I don't hurt anyone else. Well, I still grant you to think and believe as you wish. I'm glad your views constitute a small amount of Americans - and I'm still on the same side of the spectrum as you - the RIGHT side, friend.
609 posted on 11/19/2001 7:50:37 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Verax
Yes, she's the only one in my family. Sorry but it's true. Rest of my family is very right wing, Dr. Dobson types.
610 posted on 11/19/2001 7:51:47 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru; Howlin
Me too. Now, let's try and figure out who it is.

It's not me...

611 posted on 11/19/2001 7:52:30 PM PST by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
I didn't just get here yesterday. You could have logged off and back on as you!
612 posted on 11/19/2001 7:53:38 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Check your history. Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Adams and most of the others were hardly "fundamentalist."

The three I agree who were not religious (publically they were but privately were not) are Jefferson, Franklin and Paine. Washington was certainly quite devout and contrary to popular custom very private about it. Some have interpreted this to mean something else based on their agenda. I disagree with your take on Washington.

Presbyterians, Episcopalian, Methodists, Baptists, Quakers were well-represented. When I said fundamentalist I meant that those same denominations relative to today's respective denominations. Obviously I know that evangelism and the charismatics came much much later. I'm talking about the Biblical view. The first three have moved doctrinally considerably. I doubt one would recognize the differences of a Methodist sermon in 1776 from a fundamentalist sermon today.

They weren't anti-religion as many of the leaders of the French Revolution were but they weren't particularly religious either. Actually the only two Presidents of the 20th century that could be labeled Fundamentalist would be Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter.

Oh sure Carter was charismatic fundamentalist in the modern sense. I don't know much about Wilson. The founders were largely anti-Anglican and anti-Catholic for some obvious reasons, and not at all anti-religion. Though I believe there was 1 or 2 Catholic founders. Most all the States had Protestant religious requirements for elective office. Most all the states had sodomy, adultery, and pornography laws. Most all the states had laws respecting the Sabbath. Methinks we pay much to much attention to the Federal government our founders created which was far removed from the people, rather than those state and local governments that were closer and actually governed the people.

613 posted on 11/19/2001 7:54:01 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
so the founding fathers were diseased?

of course not (i know you knew this). the founding fathers had a faith in god that undergirded their beliefs on freedom. because 250 years ago the vast majority of people believed in god, their freedom was 'guided' by god's laws.

we as a nation have become apostate. we therefore need more man made laws because we no longer feel the need to be guided by god.

our founding fathers did not believe in anarchy or a system of uncontrolled freedom.

with freedom comes responsibility.

614 posted on 11/19/2001 7:54:13 PM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: FF578; yall
Your dupicity is obvious. - You're just another of a long line of previously banned, libertarian hating, authoritarian, socialist leaning, self described-in name only 'conservatives'.

Welcome back cotter. - Or mojo, navi, cynical, imbe, etc, etc.

615 posted on 11/19/2001 7:55:31 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Verax
Born Again Christian who supports a Pro-Abortion candidate - no way...never happen!

Ever heard of President Jimmy Carter? He voted for Clinton twice.

616 posted on 11/19/2001 7:55:45 PM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
No, Imbe is back under imbeiux or something like that.
617 posted on 11/19/2001 7:56:46 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
What is bestiality? Doesn't sound appetizing. Kiddy porn? No way? We're talking about what ADULTS do. Anything in moderation is no one else's business, as long as I don't hurt anyone else. Well, I still grant you to think and believe as you wish. I'm glad your views constitute a small amount of Americans - and I'm still on the same side of the spectrum as you - the RIGHT side, friend.

So sex between adults and animals is okay. Prostitution is okay...and hey...wait a minute. Moderation??? How DARE you infringe the rights of the people to indugle in their favorite vices however they see fit. If someone wants to pork (so to speak) their sheep 24x7 it's right as an American!

Moderation Nazi!!

Also you do realize that kiddy porn purveyors are attempting to change the age of sexual consent? It's really the last barrier to full, no holds barred Sodom and Gommorah stuff. You know, the city where they would screw angels because I guess it was their patriotic duty and their rights as citizens.

618 posted on 11/19/2001 7:58:30 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You could have logged off and back on as you!

LOL! That wouldn't be any fun though!

619 posted on 11/19/2001 7:58:43 PM PST by NoCurrentFreeperByThatName
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
which is exactly the libertarian stance

i know. i am having a hard time understanding if libertarians are undergirded by god's law. perhaps you can enlighten me.

thanks

620 posted on 11/19/2001 8:00:57 PM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 801-820 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson