Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What has happened to Free Republic
Me | Me

Posted on 11/19/2001 2:03:57 PM PST by FF578

Has anyone noticed that the Liberal influence has spread here into Free Republic. I notice that less and less Conservatives seem to post here, and more and more Libertarians seem to be.

I get a letter from someone named NYpeanut who is mad because I posted a discussion based on the Gender Gap in voting.

I didn't make it up, there is really a huge Gender gap with Female Voters tending toward the more liberal candidate. The discussion went well without name calling, but this person seems to have taken issue to the fact that I pointed out women seem to vote more liberally than men.

All those who are newbies here are considered disruptors, and those who hold a more right-winged view than the average libertarian seem to be kicked out.

Why is this? Is this a Libertarian site now?

I have noticed more and more posters standing up for Abortion, Homosexuality, the Porn Industry and Drugs since I first came to this site back before the 2000 Election.

Are Christian Conservatives(Who make up a large part of the Republican core vote) not allowed here anymore?

Just because one holds to a higher power, and wishes to shape society in accordance with the laws of Almighty God, does not make one a Taliban Milita member.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 801-820 next last
To: JeanS
ROFLMAO!
481 posted on 11/19/2001 6:30:03 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: FF578
Yes I have.
482 posted on 11/19/2001 6:30:09 PM PST by Pit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
FWIW it bears pointing out that cannabis, coca, and poppies are natural life forms placed on this earth ... and that the Bible states how herbs are made for the enjoyment of mankind.

God also put a brain in your head and - call it a leap of faith here if you want - I doubt he meant for you to fry it.
483 posted on 11/19/2001 6:30:57 PM PST by GussiedUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FF578
I noticed an increase in Libertarians, although certainly I don't think it's enough to nearly outnumber the traditional conservative-Republican types on this forum.

More disturbing to me is the way a whole bunch of RINOs who are racist Dem apologists seem to be allowed to run wild on this forum. Many of them spend their SOLE time on this forum to post vanities proclaiming anyone with an "R" next to their name is a "marxist"-- then go on the next thread and talk about how great life was under a bunch of segregationalist 'RATS. I don't understand why some minor posts listed under the "wrong" catergory" get pulled, but garbage like this is allowed on the forum; it certainly doesn't help "promote" conservativism or improve our image:

Abraham Lincoln: America's Greatest War Criminal [In addition to pledging they will "spit on his grave", several "Republicans" insist only "history revisionists" believe Woodrow Wilson gave us the income tax instead of Lincoln. Gee, we better leave those nice WWI-era Democrats alone]

Confederate flag down, scalawag Jeb Bush faces fight [A.K.A. "Republicans for native Floridans RENO/CHILES" thread. Some "conservatives" even talk about how great ol' Lawton "Gore recount court" Chilies was on this thread]

Man From Hope: ZELL MILLER (Nominee Sought for Golden Balls Award-- Courage in Politics) ["Conservatives" fall all over themselves to insist pro-abort Miller is "more right-wing than most of the Republican Senators from up north"]

Senator Byrd's cameo just a start"> [ <-- RINO Shucksmaster expresses glee that the senial old liberal Senator and "former" KKK member Byrd will appear as in civil war uniform to celebrate West Virgina's "hertiage"]

I want a real conservative for president [A bunch of Bush-hating "Republicans" have a bashing fest against the "war monger" here, although none of them were around to back Keyes, it seems...]

Spielberg shows darker side of saintly Lincoln Rumor had it that big DNC contributor Stevie Spielberg was going to defame the first Republican president as evil incarante to get even at the GOP for "destroying President Clinton" RINOs expressed delight that Spielberg would reveal "the truth" about Abe, which they were ready to beat down the door to see the film, several RINOs even went as far to claim Speilberg was a "conservative patriot" who's Saving Private Ryan "was made to attack the left"

Giuliani's third term (What New York can ask from Michael Bloomberg Drivel from the London Times talking about how great RINO Bloomberg is. Several self-proclaimed conservatives on this forum were overcome with joy that "former" Democrat (he switched to the GOP a few monthes before the election solely because the Dem slot was too crowded) was such a victory of the GOP. RINOs marveled at his ablity to win over Jews, minorities, and registed Democrats (gee, I wonder why that is?)

Other NON-conservative articles celebrated on freerepublic include many threads I can't find because I forgot the exact wording, but included such gems as "Condit is the son a baptist preacher and a true conservative-- the media should lay off him" , <-- paraphrased) the " we must perserve Fritz Holling's (arrogant libDem from S.C.) legacy" , the "Roy Barnes is a GREAT governor" apologist thread, the various threads talking about how Bobby & Jack Kennedy were "real conservatives" , the various "U.S. Grant was EVIL" threads , the "NRA was founded by people who destoryed the bill of rights" thread, the "Rethink the civil rights act of 1964" (article actually argued that the law passed by Senators Dirksen and Williams to outlaw public segregation was bad, and Byrd, Gore, and Ervin had the right idea), the "Jesse Helms is a UN-loving stooge" hate piece, and the ever popular "Bob Smith is an idiot who must be kicked out of office " and the "we hope Earley loses cause we hate him and Gilmore" threads (the RINOs got their wish on that one).

Even though I can't locate any of the above trash, that's just fine with me because I hope they never see the light of day on this forum again.

484 posted on 11/19/2001 6:32:11 PM PST by BillyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Yes. Maybe no one.
485 posted on 11/19/2001 6:32:57 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
That's true and when they're like that, they become much like liberals who are also too serious all the time. Reagan was cool because his humor was always there.

And that's why the liberals hated him. Liberals loved it when the typical conservative was a grumpy ultra-serious type. So Reagan comes on the scene and he is laughing AT their foibles....and they really hated that. A lot of the old line conservatives don't even realize how clueless they are. Many of them probably condemned Sam Kinison for foul language without actually LISTENING to what he said.

486 posted on 11/19/2001 6:33:30 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Well, I'm a newbie but don't consider myself a disrupter.

Compared to the 'author' of this post, you're an old timer.

487 posted on 11/19/2001 6:33:44 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Pure social Darwinism?
488 posted on 11/19/2001 6:34:13 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Most of the founding fathers were Paleo-fundies, and if they were alive today, they'd be banned from FR in 10 seconds.
489 posted on 11/19/2001 6:34:36 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspirator1
Paleo-fundies?

Care to enlighten me?

490 posted on 11/19/2001 6:36:53 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Would the founding fathers oppose the use of force in response to the 9/11 attacks on America while maintaining that our borders should be totally open?

I'm not a Libertarian Party member but I never heard that they were opposed to using force against the terrorists. OTOH, I am sure a lot of old line conservatives would have condemned Ben Franklin for writing why it is advantageous to make it with older women.

491 posted on 11/19/2001 6:37:11 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Bump.
492 posted on 11/19/2001 6:37:19 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: OWK
A passionate Jeffersonian Constitutionalist who has been associated with Libertarianism's ideals since picking up Ayn Rand at the age of fifteen -- and who scores 100% on any and every Libertarian Quiz -- I wouldn't touch the modern party with a hundred foot pole!

Its members seem more like libertines than Libertarians!

493 posted on 11/19/2001 6:37:27 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Speaking of "biggest killers" (for all of you moderates products consumed with potential life threatening possibilities), you forgot cigarettes.

"Comment #3 Removed by Moderator". This was once posted by an obvious liberal, Northman who I don't know how to locate now that he was erased. Nonetheless, if you would care to get a feel for general reaction to a leftist on our ground, read the reactions which obviously are in tact Bush Country, America .*

*Following all of the reactions to Northman may not be a good idea for you moderates.

494 posted on 11/19/2001 6:37:34 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FF578
Thank you for this thread FF578

Lilly
COC, CNLGLFG.com
495 posted on 11/19/2001 6:38:53 PM PST by Lilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OWK
Hey! I was told you'd been banned!

Glad it wasn't true.

496 posted on 11/19/2001 6:39:54 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspirator1
Most of the founding fathers were Paleo-fundies, and if they were alive today, they'd be banned from FR in 10 seconds.

Sorry but most of them just weren't all that religious. Not Franklin, not Washington, and not Jefferson. They weren't anti-religion but they just weren't too religious for the most part.

497 posted on 11/19/2001 6:40:15 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: OWK
That's what keeps it fun.
498 posted on 11/19/2001 6:40:40 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I'm not a Libertarian Party member but I never heard that they were opposed to using force against the terrorists. OTOH, I am sure a lot of old line conservatives would have condemned Ben Franklin for writing why it is advantageous to make it with older women.

Perhaps you should get out of the history books more?

499 posted on 11/19/2001 6:41:13 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Just checking in...I hear Ron Brown is still dead...is that true?
500 posted on 11/19/2001 6:41:32 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 801-820 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson