Posted on 11/05/2001 10:16:14 PM PST by KQQL
Vote Earley
Bush, Giuliani, and Bishop Loverde pitch in.
By John J. Miller & Ramesh Ponnuru
November 5, 2001 11:00 a.m.
Behind in the polls and badly outspent by his opponent, Virginia's GOP candidate for governor brought America's two most popular politicians and an important religious leader into his campaign over the weekend. Mark Earley's campaign mailed a brochure displaying a big picture of Earley walking half a step behind President Bush on what appears to be a tarmac. Inside, there's a quote from Bush: "I appreciate his strong stance on holding the line on taxes and cutting the car tax in Virginia." Bush recorded a phone message on behalf of Earley and two ticket mates, lieutenant governor candidate Jay Katzen and attorney general candidate Jerry Kilgore: "Mark Earley, Jay Katzen and Jerry Kilgore are the experienced leaders Virginia needs to keep the state moving forward--with a positive agenda for lower taxes, accountable schools, more jobs, and a safe and secure commonwealth." Earley's campaign also aired a new ad featuring New York mayor Rudy Giuliani: "If I were a Virginian, I would vote for Mark Earley." Voters who tuned in to the start of the World Series game last night would have seen it.
In northern Virginia, Earley may benefit as well from a letter by Catholic Bishop Paul Loverde that was either read at Masses or inserted into church bulletins over the weekend. In it, Loverde reminds parishioners of their "moral responsibility to vote" on Tuesday. "Respect for the dignity of the human person must be part of our consciousness as we enter the voting booth," continues the two-page letter. It also reminds voters of "the priority to protect the human life of all persons, pre-born and born."
The letter would have been stronger if Loverde had mentioned specifically that Earley is the pro-life candidate in the race and that his opponent, Democrat Mark Warner, supports abortion rights. In other words, there's more than just a moral responsibility to vote; there's a moral responsibility to vote for Mark Earley. Another possibility would have been to attach a scorecard showing how Earley and Warner (plus other candidates down the ticket) differ on abortion. Earley, for instance, supports legislation to require parental consent before a minor may obtain an abortion, while Warner won't commit past the parental-notification law that Earley helped enact.
As things stand, the bishop's letter leaves voters on their own to figure out the candidates' positions by tomorrow's election day. Perhaps they're sophisticated enough to know where Earley and Warner stand. Then again, perhaps not--and they won't receive much help from Earley's campaign website, which focuses on taxes, education, and safety issues.
But it's a good conclusion to what has been a lackluster campaign. In the end, though, the only thing that may salvage the hopes of those who intend to vote Earley is if they somehow manage to vote often.
Turnout was very light this morning in Sterling; only 2 people ahead of me in line to vote. Many people are still stuck in traffic when the polls close at 7 PM.
Are you kidding me? Where is this? Someone should sue the ass off the teachers union. There's plenty of time for them to vote after work like everyone else.
Me, too...and I was pleasantly surprised as well at the busy parking lot in my VERY REPUBLICAN voting precinct considering it was just after 6:30 am!! The pro-Earley poll workers were in high spirits and we high-fived on the way out...I taunted the pro-Warner lady fer a bit, then headed into the office.
Been making calls and sending emails to my RightWing friends since then...I SENSE AN EARLEY WIN!! And it'll be the grass roots that make it happen!! SCREW the EFFETE ELITE Leftist DemonRATS!!
FReegards...MUD
The libs have lots of ways of unethically affecting an election, but this isn't one of them.
Out at 6am this morning to vote Earley! One piece of good news - I saw someone hand back the sample ballot to the Warner rep saying "Warner is the democrat???". I think having the "R" and "D" placed next to the candidates names helps us a lot more than we think in this election.
I really, really doubt a quick call in Virginia. As has been discussed before, Virginia GOP candidates consistently outperform their poll numbers. I'm hoping that there's a decision before the 11:00 News, but I won't be surprised if there isn't a decision by then. Weather is clear, so my prediction of an Earley victory by less than 1% stands. My "margin of error" (personally judged, of course) is probably 3%. So I'll also give my prediction uncertainty range:
Max bad: Warner 52%, Earley 48% Max good: Earley 54%, Warner 46%.
Speaking of the weather, the lack of rain here in the mid-Atlantic is putting us on track for a drought watch for December. So not only will the new Virginia governor have to be concerned about shrinking revenues, he'll have to be concerned about shrinking rivers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.