Skip to comments.
Justice Department won't let (FBI) agent testify (in Nichol's state trial)
Indianapolis Star ^
| November 3, 2001
| JAMES PATTERSON
Posted on 11/03/2001 12:15:30 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
Edited on 05/07/2004 6:26:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-185 next last
To: Judge Parker
Thank you for the heads up to the article and your views! I'm praying for your mother-in-law! She sounds like quite a lady!!!
To: marajade
How do you know there is a cover up?Because I can read. Did you not read the article? "Vogel could not testify for Nichols' regarding the affidavits because the Justice Department doesn't want the former FBI agent to be heard." Again: The Justice Department doesn't want the former FBI agent to be heard. It's pretty straightforward.
142
posted on
11/04/2001 1:11:11 PM PST
by
Sandy
To: Memphis Schmuel
--thanks for the comments! As to the media, we have the INTERNET! it's taking over, people are becoming not just consumers of the news, but reporting it, commenting on it-and making it! Because we can share, instantly, we can bypass the controlled press, or at least get to look at so many angles, that it becomes "more" real than in the past. Just like this thread, and okc submariners work, and so many others work, we all can be 'the media" now. And yes, that's really our best chance right now.
143
posted on
11/04/2001 1:56:07 PM PST
by
zog
To: Sandy
He may have security issues that relate to the entire country that can't be let out in court. Like I stated, Nichol's can appeal.
To: marajade
He may have security issues that relate to the entire country that can't be let out in court.Uh-huh. And Clinton covered this up for 6 years because he's just a swell guy looking out for the good of the country. Oh, that's right, I almost forgot...when Clinton did it, it was bad; but when Bush continues it, it's okay. National security. Got it.
145
posted on
11/04/2001 2:10:15 PM PST
by
Sandy
Comment #146 Removed by Moderator
To: honway; OKCSubmariner; AtticusX; alien2; Judge Parker; golitely; thinden; zog
The reason that Republicans sometimes cover for Democrats and Denocrats sometimes cover for Republicans is not complicated, and you nailed it:
"If all that you know and have effectively reported concerning OKC was revealed to the public at large, confidence in our government by the masses would be irrevocably shaken. The result would negatively effect the existing power structure and our economy."
Those currently and recently in power, both Republican and Democrat, have been successful because the rules of the game -- and the essential illusions of the electorate -- favor them. If either the rules or the illusions change, they might lose their grip. The whole truth about any one of a number of longstanding converups -- living American POWs abandoned in enemy hands, CIA drug running, Inslaw-Promis, BCCI, Waco, Vince Foster, Ron Brown, WTC I, OKC bombing, TWA800 -- would certainly change the illusions, and no one in the power structure of either party is going to let that happen.
147
posted on
11/04/2001 3:17:45 PM PST
by
LSJohn
To: chantal7
We need to get a grip on our government, like yesterday. It's totally out of control!
Please share YOUR ideas on how to accomplish the above...
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
..."If you keep doing what you've been doing...
...you'll just keep getting what you've been getting"...
148
posted on
11/04/2001 3:27:56 PM PST
by
freddy
To: LSJohn; Judge Parker; BlueDogDemo; OKCSubmariner; rdavis84; Wallaby; golitely; Fred Mertz
been out of pocket. thanx for all the flags to such an outstanding thread. I'm pretty much back up to speed.
best regards to all.
special prayers to Judge Parker. if that mountain livin can get ya that close to 100, I'll take it!
149
posted on
11/04/2001 3:58:12 PM PST
by
thinden
Comment #150 Removed by Moderator
Comment #151 Removed by Moderator
Comment #152 Removed by Moderator
Comment #153 Removed by Moderator
Comment #154 Removed by Moderator
To: Alamo-Girl
Thanks for your prayers, she is quite a lady. She is a great and good example for her family. We're hoping she improves enough so she can come and live with us. That is the desire of our heart.
To: ratcat
"You're alive and Danny's not. Why?"
I didn't post that, only quoted it.
Comment #157 Removed by Moderator
Comment #158 Removed by Moderator
Comment #159 Removed by Moderator
Comment #160 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-185 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson