Justice Department won't let (FBI) agent testify (in Nichol's state trial)

Indianapolis Star ^ | November 3, 2001 | JAMES PATTERSON

[OKCSubmariner]

While Terry Nichols, already convicted on federal charges in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, returned to court Monday to face the state's case against him, the government was squirming to squelch evidence that Nichols and Timothy McVeigh did not act by themselves.

[lawdog]

Those who continue this charade despite whatever political affiliations do so so because 1. They have been manipulated, thus duped, 2. They are compromised. 3. They too are criminals. 4. They have their own agendas which do not square with "full and honest disclosure".

Anyway you look at it it ain't good.

[Judge Parker]

Now, you are sounding like a fanatic. Until you can give me a convincing argument as to why the Bushes would allow Reno to get away with this, when they are running a political campaign against her in FLA, I will disregard your posts.

EarlyBird, I'd like to hear your reasoned explanation as to just why the Republicans don't want the FBI agent to testify about his knowledge of more than twenty Oklahomans swearing under oath that they saw McVeigh with people who appeared to be of Middle Eastern heritage? Would you say that Bush and his Justice Department are committed to making public all the details of the killing of more than 160 Americans? Would you say that OKCSubmariner is a member of the Michigan militia for posting a news article which raises serious questions about the honesty, decency and integrity of the Bush Administration? What are you, a recruiter for the Michigan Militia?

[Judge Parker]

I noticed you flagged Judge Parker earlier. I haven't seen him here in awhile, now. Has anyone heard from him? Monkeywrench, except for being able to post a couple of times recently, I've been on the road for more than two weeks because of a family emergency. It's just a hurtful part of the life process, my mother-in-law is 97 years-old and is having a very hard time. She's a wonderful lady who on her worst day, on the edge of death, unable to breathe, with her oxygen level bottoming out, is more aware and wise and caring that the Government supporters we constantly run into. Based on this observation, I've decided that the Government types can't possibly be as ignorant, unwise, foolish and uncaring as they appear - they just want lurkers to think they're on the Government side. Why, you ask? It's simple, they're secret recruiters for the Michigan Militia. It's their sole purpose to expose the shallowness of the Government argument.

Consequently, I think we should be much easier on them. They're actually on our side. They're just making the Government side look ignorant and foolish. If we had a few more of them, we'd win this thing.

God bless all, it'd be a sorry world without people like you.

[Sandy]

Terry Nichol's has the right to appeal the decision if he doesn't like it.

Oh for crying out loud...talk about missing the point. Sheez. We're pissed about the continuing cover-up, not the abuse of Terry Nichols' civil rights (although that is a side issue). He wouldn't have to appeal if the feds would simply let him have his witness.

[Professor Jim]

My point wasn't a JUSTIFICATION--it was the opposite. Someone said that the Iraqi connection can't be true because the Bush administration would have no incentive to keep it quiet. I was pointing out that they might well have an incentive to keep it quiet. Thus, my comments tended to support the possibility that the story is true.

[Sandy]

what law, power or precedent...

TOUHY v. RAGEN

[E.G.C.]

BTTT!!!!!

[rdavis84]

"What the 'h' are you talking about? Reno isn't in power anymore. She's gone; she's history. Ashcroft is the attorney general - he's in charge now. This is Ashcroft's and Bush's doing. You people can't keep blaming what is happening now on Clinton and Reno. The federal government is doing what Bush wants done now. Face the facts and deal with it. Both Bush and Clinton work for the same NWO puppet masters. Nothing has changed and it's not going to until we get the Repub/Demo party out of control. No one at the Justice Dept. is doing anything contrary to what Bush wants done."

I made it Bold, because it said Exactly what I would have :-)

Just a detail, but when the Monica thingy was in full glory many "good" Republicans could see that a diversion was possibly going on. Now, there's a "war" going on and they can't see the diversion.

In the meantime, we get crap fed to us like "trust them" (Bush Sr.'s recycled crew), and "loose lips sink ships", Like we can damage the "War Effort" by communicating something "secret". Some of the most Juvenile Game Playing I've ever seen.

I saw some B-52's flying east the other day. You don't suppose .....???? Naw, Forget I said that. They (Taliban) might shoot them down.

[rdavis84]

"Ever heard of Promis or Inslaw?"

They're way past that now. Look at the new bank crawling software mentioned here --- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/563257/posts

[marajade]

You are making assumptions that aren't there. How do you know there is a cover up?

[Twodees]

Yep, and that's why I don't try to convert them. The last thing I want is someone on my side stupid enough to shoot me in the back because they suddenly decided to fall for someone's BS and switch allegiances again.

Twisting their tails and mocking them is much more productive than trying to convert them. You can't polish a turd, you know.

[monkeywrench]

Glad you're alright. I will remember your mother-in-law in my prayers. As far as the shills go, I thought we were done with the spinners coming here, after clinton left. Yes, I honestly did!

[OKCSubmariner]

In your reply #111 you wrote to me : "I warn you though that you'd better stick with OKC. So far you're still alive."

What is it that you "warn" me Not to stick with? Please spell it out so I can know the "ground rules". The OKC story connects directly to corruption in the DOJ, FBI and the WTC attacks which were planned and trained for in OKC starting in 1993 all the way to 2001 (just ask Steve Emerson or view "Jihad in America").

BTW, Do you mean to suggest that A Republican Attorney General (Meese-Promis/Inslaw) could be as evil, corrupt and dangerous as a Democratic Attorney General(Reno)?