Left-wing Castro front groups in US possible Transit of Saddam's Anthrax into America?

A loss to Afghanistan, should we lose this war, would be final and fatal to us. It could not fail to be part of a process that would reduce us to the scale of a minor power. And that is exactly why the left wants us to lose this war. The ABC news network and the leftists within this organization, especially the ABC radio news network which broadcasts on ABC affiliates at the top of the hour, have gone into full operation in trying to undermine the war effort in Afghanistan. We are not even four weeks into this war, which we have already made significant groundwork considering the war has only just started, and already we see ABC for example taking on all the methods used by the left in undermining the war effort in Vietnam in the late 1960's and early 70's, the themes around the clock by ABC are a focus on civilian casualties, with every single report, every hour, including numbers of civilians killed or non-military buildings destroyed, often reports that go on for many minutes with an obtuse referral, only at the end of the news item, that the numbers were provided by the enemy. Every hour, perhaps a variation of the same report, confusing the audience such that multiple reports of the same enemy claim of civilian casualties appears to the public as many different reports, one blurred and continuous horror story of massive misdirection of military might. In every real war, such as the one we are now engaged, casualties of US troops and support are expected, a loss of a tank usually should only be a footnote, the loss of personnel in a particular operation though tragic an expected statistic. Yet, the theme is that with the loss of even one tank, this single tank is made into acute, vital news, the loss exaggerated beyond any import to the war, and of course included in this theme which is propagated by ABC in order to try an undermine the war effort is to play up the strength of the enemy, i.e. "the Taliban is standing strong". The same methods as used in Vietnam, the use of propaganda word-smiting, such as repeated used of terms such as "the starving poor", "hungry villagers", in order to paint an image of the enemy in a different light by trying to confuse Americans to think that the enemy, even though they are "standing strong", are also nothing but starving poor who need our help instead of bombs - as if they are now starving only because of America and as if they were not already starving before anybody knew where Kabul is on the map. Yet, what ABC doesn't understand is that this is not Vietnam, and these leftist of ABC, by taking up all the methods they used to undermine the war effort in Vietnam to try and also undermine this war effort, they don't ponder that they themselves, the leftist ideologues and personnel of ABC, are also under attack by this enemy who has attacked us, that this enemy will surely kill them as they will others. What ABC doesn't understand is, when this enemy speaks of "Death to Israel, Death to America", it is like the National Socialists when they spoke of death to the Jews - ABC doesn't understand that the enemy doesn't just see us as a military opponent, they see us as the next Jew for the ovens.

There are also many Americans who simply do not understand this element of the war, that we are not just seen as the enemy, we are seen as people to be put into the gas chambers. The Nazi's, they had a "chemical weapon" called Zyclon-B and other such hallmarks. Did they use this gas on the battlefields, against the French for example? While such chemical or biological warfare was seldom, if ever, used by the Germans (though such was used by the armies of Imperial Japan) against the armies of France, England, America, they certainly didn't hesitate to use it against the Jews. They used this gas on the Jews, because they saw the Jews in a different way, as a different enemy, than the average G.I. Joe enemy. Today, Islamic terrorists try to obtain chemical and biological weapons to use against us. They want to poison us, gas us. You see, it is because they don't see us as the average G.I. Joe enemy as well - they see us as the next Jews to be gassed.

Why would the left, and in particular the extreme left, support such an enemy? The answer is this: rather the most anti-liberal regime on the face of the plant, the 12th Century Taliban, be victorious as far as the left is concerned, and it is simply because they hate us so much and would rather support the regime in Iraq for example, a regime that uses chemical and biological weapons of terror on their own people, if it meant another cusp of propaganda and hatred they can retch upon us.

The threat of Iraq demonstrates this, for one simply needs to visit the many web pages of the various left-wing Castro front-groups for example - notice the focus on Iraq. Why? I will tell you, the answer isn't their concern for the starving poor in Iraq. The answer is found in the hatred of the left-wing for the United States, and their hatred of England and nations that are the apex of our civilization. The cultic left-wing extremists, they will support cavemen who would take civilization back centuries if it simply meant the destruction of us, if it would bring a dreadful blight to our governments and liberty.

Castro front groups which are stationed in the United States are speaking a lot about Iraq, and perhaps the governments who have declared a war on terrorism should pay attention here, take note: Iraq - this is significant.

The reason Castro front groups in the USA expound so much about Iraq, is not because they actually care about sanctions or whatever they claim - the reason is that they currently have a liaison with Iraq and the Saddam Hussein regime. That is a fact.

These Castro front groups can be found in Florida, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Texas, and California. In fact, they can be found across the United States (and other countries), and are very active in certain key states.

In 1989 Central Intelligence Agency director William Webster, in warning about the use of biological terrorism, reported that 10 countries were developing biological weapons, some since 1995 likely to have done so, and these countries are also included in the list named as evident biological weapons producers according to sources cited by the Office of Technology Assessment and U.S. intelligence under the first Bush administration. When we review these lists, it is a composite of terrorist nations, nations which likely not only manufacture the biological (as well as chemical weapons and nerve gas), but also likely export such agents to others. The list consists of the nations of Iraq (of course), and there is Libya, Syria, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, Bulgaria, South Africa, China, and Russia which the former Soviet Union insists they have terminated their biological program. Other nations which apparently also manufacture such agents, but not necessarily export them, are Egypt, Taiwan, Israel, and now there are more nations as suspect including the newest suspects Vietnam, Laos, India, and of course, Pakistan. Cuba came into the picture about 1995, and it is likely that Cuba did not need to manufacture anthrax if it could be obtained from Iraq.

CONTINUED . . .

Look at the rhetoric of Castro front groups, such as the Workers World Party, Gloria La Riva, units of the Peace and Freedom Party. Look at the Fellowship of Reconciliation, the Workers Defense League, Turn Toward Peace, Castro operatives who have infiltrated and taken control of units of the American Friends Service Committee, the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA), and on and on. There is one notable and common focus of the various Castro accomplices, and that is their rhetoric regarding Iraq. Why Iraq? Why such emphasis, in the words of so-called Pastors for Castro, the ARCA Foundation, others? It seems they were all given the same cue, just around 1995 . . . why Iraq?

Read the words of Marcus Tullius Cicero regarding the danger of internal subversion. In a speech to the Roman Senate, as recorded by Sallust, Cicero said:

"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. The traitor is the plague."

Would left wing organizations engage in terrorist activities? Just look at the SLA, and the SDS of the 60's and 70's - all they need is a war to be against, and they will certainly start killing Americans and support the enemy. Could Left-wing Castro front groups in the US be a possible transit of Saddam's anthrax into America? I have no direct proof, but I think that their rhetoric, and what indicates their liaison with Iraq, could be evidence enough that they should be investigated. In my opinion, in addition to the existing Islamic terrorist network within America (thanks to our open border policy), these Castro front groups and their leftist cells would be the most efficient, and because of their hatred for America and desire to see us fail in Afghanistan, willing, agent of Iraq and the Islamic biological and chemical weapons terrorist network.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.