Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Container Found In Fayetteville Tests Positive For Anthrax
wral.com ^ | 11/02/01 | Julie Moos

Posted on 11/02/2001 10:56:33 AM PST by nctracy

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:55:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Thanks for the map. I hope they are keeping an eye on the schools, hospitals and malls in the area. I think the close up map shows it next to a shopping mall?
61 posted on 11/02/2001 2:52:11 PM PST by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

An update. Note, room was registered to people of Middle Eastern descent.

Container Found In Fayetteville Tests Positive For Anthrax

Only 20-30 Percent Of Positives Are Accurate

Julie Moos, Staff Writer

POSTED: 1:47 p.m. EST November 2, 2001

UPDATED: 2:40 p.m. EST November 2, 2001

FAYETTEVILLE, NC -- Around 9:30 a.m. Friday, a motel employee at StudioPlus Deluxe Studios found a sealed plastic container in a rest room. The employee thought it was suspicious, contacted his manager, and they called for emergency respose.

Haz-mat teams and firefighters did an initial test on the container and that test came back positive. Then, they did two more screenings and both of those tests came back positive for anthrax as well.

Initial field tests are not 100 percent accurate. In fact, officials say a positive test has only a 20-30 percent accuracy.

The 20 employees and guests of the hotel have been bused to another location where the health department is collecting their names, phone numbers, and medical histories. Officials will then determine whether to put them on antibiotics.

Sycamore Dairy Road, where the hotel is located, remains open, although the building has been evacuated and the ventilation system shut down.

Officials say even if the package did have anthrax on it, it is not contagious and there is no cause for Fayetteville residents to panic.

The police and SBI are investigating where the container came from and who it belongs to.

The material has been taken to a state lab for further testing, and those results are expected back in 72 hours.

WRAL-TV5 and WRAL.com will have the latest updates as they become available Click here for the article

62 posted on 11/02/2001 3:24:10 PM PST by nctracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

I believe I posted the same article I did originally. Sorry. If you click the link I gave, it gives the article I meant to post. It's Friday, gimme a break. :)
63 posted on 11/02/2001 3:28:10 PM PST by nctracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: nctracy
My husband is going to Durham on business in a couple of weeks. They always stay at StudioPlus. Great...
64 posted on 11/02/2001 3:34:04 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
I wonder if instead of a restroom, it was found in a rental unit bathroom? Perhaps the room was still rented and a maid thought the container was suspect?

Perhaps they thought it was suspect because they were already suspicious about the room's occupant(s).

65 posted on 11/02/2001 3:57:45 PM PST by Lorraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nctracy; *Anthrax_Scare_List
To find all articles tagged or indexed using

Anthrax_Scare_List

Go here:

Anthrax_Scare_List

66 posted on 11/02/2001 5:16:43 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nctracy
Here's a note from a linked article within the updated article that is at WRALtv.com website.

"The deputy Director of North Carolina's Public Health lab, John Sheats, says the accuracy rate for the field tests Haz-Mat teams across the state are using is troubling. "They lack precision and they lack accuracy," he says. "That's why we recommend that you do lab work." Sheats says that some of the better tests have a 30 percent false positive rate and that some of the ones that are not quite as good have a 50-50 positivity rates.

I believe that means there is 30-50% chance the tests given so far are not accurate for there being anthrax here.

That's somewhat comforting - though not as great a comfort as what the original article seemed to indicate - which was a 70% chance of a false positive.

67 posted on 11/02/2001 5:21:42 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: nctracy
Here is the article's author's quote in the original article re: the accuracy rate of the "field tests" used to detect anthrax on the container found in Fayetteville:

"In fact, officials say a positive test has only a 20-30 percent accuracy."

I am really tired - so I may not be reading this right - but if I read the linked info above - it says not that there is a 20-30 per cent chance the test is accurate - but a 30% chance the test is NOT accurate - for a good test / and a 50% chance the test is NOT accurate - for a mediocre field test.

Did I miss something?

Either way - we have to wait this maddening 72 hrs to find out what the doggone bacteria actually is! If it is Anthrax - well - the linked article said "people of Middle Eastern descent were at that hotel before this was found". One would hope that the authorities are tracking these "people of ME descent" NOW - and not waiting the 72 hrs to find out what this stuff really is. Is that profiling? Yes - too bad.

68 posted on 11/02/2001 5:26:44 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt


These triple-wrapped cans contain samples of a powdery substance that tested positive for anthrax. The substance was found at a Fayetteville hotel in a sealed container about the size of a soda can.

69 posted on 11/02/2001 5:31:31 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jerod
Not to mention that I heard from my mom's best friend's cat that Nostradomus predicted: "White tiny beings in cylinder in place of rest on path of white barked tree and milk cow haven in black substance province will precede the end of the world." AAAH!!! :)
70 posted on 11/02/2001 5:42:16 PM PST by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Hi, there. Yes, glad you posted the pictures.

Will see what WRAL reports at 11 PM.

71 posted on 11/02/2001 5:48:42 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc
LOL, you are funny!
72 posted on 11/02/2001 5:55:14 PM PST by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RightlySo
If tests are 25% accurate, then for each test there is 75% chance of false positive. If three tests are made, the chance of a false positive is 3/4 x 3/4 x 3/4 = 27/64 or about 42%.
73 posted on 11/02/2001 6:23:22 PM PST by T Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RightlySo
The field tests are crap. Even when they are occassionaly correct in being positive for bacteria that doesn't mean it's anthrax. They should stop using them bec they are worthless and create bogus stories and panic like this.

I'll bet you a thousand dollars it's Tide or Gain or something like that.

The locals and the media overreacted. Antibiotics should have been given unless a LAB result was positive.

Someone said something about Stevens -- he became ill while visiting NC, which pretty much indicated that he was infected before coming here which was borne out by finding the spores in his office.

Nothing to see here, folks, let's move along.

74 posted on 11/03/2001 5:04:22 AM PST by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
O K!

(pssst. Somebody call the rubber truck, we've got a live one here.)

75 posted on 11/03/2001 11:25:30 AM PST by jerod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: twigs
His son is going to University - What's he taking? Veterinary studies maybe? Access to Anthrax?
76 posted on 11/03/2001 11:32:31 AM PST by jerod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Thanks for the heads up, harpseal. There was an Army special forces ex on FOX the other day who termed it a "weapon of mass distraction". I get the same feeling that the the sappers are busying us with this while cranking up another punch.
77 posted on 11/03/2001 6:19:53 PM PST by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson