Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second Amendments Rights In Reality and In Court
Eagle Forum ^ | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 11/02/2001 8:05:50 AM PST by Asmodeus

If the hijackers had used guns for their crimes on 9/11, we would surely now be caught up in a frenzy of demands that this "lesson" calls for tough gun-control legislation. But they didn't use any firearms, just easily purchased box-cutters.

The real lesson of 9/11 is that, if any pilot or off-duty policeman had had a gun on board, he could have averted supreme tragedy by doing what all our powerful FBI, CIA, and Armed Services could not do.

That's why individuals, not government, are the ultimate protectors of a free society. The American people understand this. The 9/11 events have led to a big increase in gun purchases and the taking of courses at shooting ranges.

Against the stunning reality of 9/11, the federal Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit just issued a landmark decision in United States v. Emerson, affirming the constitutional right of individuals to own a gun. The Founding Fathers understood this, and that's why they gave us the Second Amendment.

The Emerson case tackled the meaning of the right "to keep and bear arms" in the Bill of Rights. At issue was whether the Second Amendment defines an individual right, protecting defendant Emerson and all law-abiding citizens, or a collective right available only to government groups such as the National Guard.

This disagreement about the meaning of the Second Amendment has been a matter of intense debate for many years. Unfortunately, federal court decisions in several circuits over the last several decades have muddied up the issue.

The Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." For many years, the anti- gun lobby and some lower court decisions have touted the notion that the Second Amendment is limited to firearms carried in actual military situations rather than by civilians in peaceful self-defense.

The Emerson decision thoroughly rejects that theory. The Court ruled: "The plain meaning of the right of the people to keep arms is that it is an individual, rather than a collective, right and is not limited to keeping arms while engaged in active military service or as a member of a select militia such as the National Guard."

The court concludes: "It appears clear that `the people,' as used in the Constitution, including the Second Amendment, refers to individual Americans." This is consistent with the use of the term "the people" in all the other amendments in the Bill of Rights.

As the Tenth Amendment shows, the Founders clearly understood the difference between "the states" and "the people." The Emerson decision also cites the renowned Black's Law Dictionary definition for "carry arms or weapons" as "being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in case of conflict with another person."

At stake in the gun control debate is whether we control government and defend freedom, or government controls us. Should our defense against hijacking terrorism be limited to government fighter planes shooting down hijacked planes, killing everyone on board, or extended to allowing airplane crews and qualified passengers (such as off-duty law enforcement officials) to take defensive measures without fear of litigation or prosecution?

The Emerson decision disposed of arguments that only formal state militias have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms. As the Supreme Court explained over 60 years ago in United States v. Miller, the framers of the Constitution used the term "militia" to mean "all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense."

It still does mean that. Current federal law (10 U.S. Code 311) states: "The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age. . . . The classes of the militia are (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia."

The males on board the hijacked airplanes constituted a militia, and some courageously acted, forcing one hijacked plane down in rural Pennsylvania instead of allowing it to continue to the terrorists' target. A disarmed public cannot protect a free society against terrorists' assaults.

In Cuba, Castro first required all guns to be surrendered before he could impose his brutal dictatorship. After England banned private gun ownership, violence using guns against persons rose sharply and politics turned sharply left.

Strict gun control creates vulnerable targets for the enemies of a free society. The Fifth Circuit's upholding of the constitutional right of individuals to keep and bear arms is a welcome development in our continued defense of freedom.

__________________________

Militia
"All Males Physically Capable of Acting In Concert For The Common Defense."


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/02/2001 8:05:50 AM PST by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus; *bang_list
Bump to the bang list.
2 posted on 11/02/2001 8:09:15 AM PST by white trash redneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
if any pilot or off-duty policeman had had a gun on board...

Or any armed citizens as imagined by the Founding Fathers...

3 posted on 11/02/2001 8:44:47 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Blam! to the top!
4 posted on 11/02/2001 8:46:34 AM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
10-4 on this. Peace and safety exist whereever good strong people tread. They do not permit crime in their domain.
5 posted on 11/02/2001 9:19:00 AM PST by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age..."

Males only? Won't the femlibbers complain about that?

6 posted on 11/02/2001 9:25:36 AM PST by etcetera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
The real lesson of 9/11 is that, if any pilot or off-duty policeman had had a gun on board,

If any passenger had had a gun on board*****

7 posted on 11/02/2001 9:29:56 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Bump - "Don't Tread on Me"
8 posted on 11/02/2001 9:32:17 AM PST by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etcetera
"Males only? Won't the femlibbers complain about that?"

Well, the majority of them better not complain, as they are of the group that doesn't believe in gun ownership anyway. Ergo, no conflict with their "principles".

9 posted on 11/02/2001 1:27:50 PM PST by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: veracious
"A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." - Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

To arms, to arms, the terrorists are coming!

America's Militia wants YOU!
Congress has provided (Article I - Section. 8, U.S. Constitution) the Militia with a means to arm themselves: CMP (Civilian Markmenship Program).

Luke 22:36 (KJV) --Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

Got sword? (M1 Garand ==>CMP)

No mercy, no quarter!
May the jihadists burn in hell for eternity!
Help speed them on their way!

Please download and sign the Petition to Attorney General Ashcroft, asking him to enforce the Second Amendment.
Bible quotes in favor of annihilating jihadists
Molon Labe!

10 posted on 11/02/2001 8:07:50 PM PST by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson