Posted on 10/31/2001 10:11:16 PM PST by JohnHuang2
Libertarians: Repeal
all gun laws
Party calls firearms 'practical solution' to problem of terrorism
By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
One result of the recent terrorist attacks in the U.S. has been a surge in gun sales, prompting the Libertarian Party to call on lawmakers to repeal a number of gun-control measures.
"More Americans are beginning to realize that the Second Amendment is not some fossilized remnant of a frontier nation, but a practical solution to the 21st century problem of terrorism," Steve Dasbach, the party's national director, said yesterday. "Now, it's time for politicians to acknowledge this change in attitude as well as the new reality of the terrorism threat and immediately start repealing laws that prohibit law-abiding Americans from buying and carrying firearms to protect themselves and their families."
The party quoted recent media reports denoting the rise in gun sales.
The Washington Post, on Oct. 2, reported "a surge in gun sales" following the Sept. 11 attacks against the U.S. The paper said that applications to buy handguns in Virginia doubled the week after the attack, and background checks for handguns, rifles and shotguns went up by 32 percent.
Forty-five percent more Americans "value Second Amendment rights" than before the terrorist attacks, according to an NRA poll reported by U.S. News & World Report in the magazine's Nov. 5 issue.
In Colorado, background checks for concealed-carry permits jumped 172 percent from August to October, according to the Rocky Mountain News' Oct. 30 edition.
In Connecticut, 41 percent more people bought guns in September 2001 than in the same month last year, according to an Oct. 2 Associated Press report.
Women across the country are signing up for gun safety courses in record numbers, according to the Oct. 10 "Today Show" on NBC, with sales of guns to women increasing by 60 percent.
CBS Morning News reported Oct. 2 that gun sales in California arguably the most restrictive gun control state in the union rose 42 percent since the attacks.
The reason for so much renewed interest in guns is obvious, Dasbach said.
"Americans have begun to realize, following the Sept. 11 tragedy, that government and police cannot keep them safe from every danger."
"There is simply no way the government can protect 280 million Americans from stealthy terrorists or even garden-variety criminals," the party leader said. "Americans have begun to understand that they must take personal responsibility for their own safety. That's why we're seeing such a surge in gun sales especially to vulnerable demographic groups, like women."
Currently, the LP noted that about 21,000 federal, state and local laws limit or prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms or ban outright the carry or ownership of others. Such bans and restrictions are leaving Americans at risk, the party says.
"Sept. 11 was a wake-up call to America that we are vulnerable to terrorists," noted Dasbach. "Now, politicians need to wake up and start repealing the 21,000 gun-control laws they passed over the last few decades."
He added, "It is unconscionable that old-fashioned gun laws and anti-gun politicians can prevent Americans from protecting themselves and their families from murderous terrorists."
For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.
Is there some special dispensation being given to those who bait libertarians?
I take it pretty seriously when some asshole accuses me of having sex with children.... yes.
biblewonk is too busy meeting with his lawyer over his $1 Million suit against the local cops for their "wrong house" no-knock drug raid that just demolished his trailer.
I seems we have, once again, a 'special' group on FR, to whom the rules do not apply.
It so happens I'm also a Christian, biblewonk.
You may choose to let slanderous comments stand, but I challenge them when I see them. I also challenge those who agree with them to provide substance to their claims. You made a flippant comment that was incredibly foolish. Be big enough to admit you were wrong and let's move on.
You sir are a not only a liar, you are a stupid liar.
If it's a totally ridiculous and disgusting statement, why do you agree with it?
Your picking a fight with the wrong group on those issues my friend. I would suggest you take back your remarks.
Ah, the old "you have to give up your rights so you can keep your rights, doncha get it" circular argument. You guys are like manic puppies chasing your tails. Perhaps that is why your field of vision is so limited and self-focused.
By the way, exactly how does a statist like yourself define a "free republic?"
Who is going to protect your rights and property while you are stoned?
Like you obviously give a rat's patoot about our rights. Stoned or not, we can do a damn site better job of protecting our own rights and property without self-superior busy bodies like you dreaming up new ways to steal them from us for your benefit and our "safety and protection." But, thanks for caring.
Since alchol is legal you must be drunk. That explains your behavior. I was wondering what your problem was.
RE: Sin hard. Enjoy!
"If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but the true mercy. If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the true, not an imaginary sin. God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides... No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day. Do you think such an exalted Lamb paid merely a small price with a meager sacrifice for our sins? Pray hard for you are quite a sinner."-- Let Your Sins Be Strong: A Letter From Luther to Melanchthon Letter no. 99, 1 August 1521
If someone accused you of being Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict you?(Intellectual, entertaining, facetious, tangential, and rhetorical)
That's funny. I sure can spot things like that and masons and the like. My neighbor is a mensa, ultraliberal, Unitarian and I'm sure she'd call herself a Christian too. But she denies that anyone had to die for anyones sins.
Your summations about myself are so jocular that they deign probity.
That's some bible! But what would I know? I think that the words ultraliberal and unitarian can't be found congruent with Mensa.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.