Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huge explosion hits front lines north of Kabul
The Associated Press ^ | 10/30/2001 5:20 am ET | The Associated Press

Posted on 10/30/2001 2:14:26 AM PST by mdittmar

JABAL SARAJ, Afghanistan (AP) A huge explosion hit the Bagram front lines about 25 miles north of Kabul on Tuesday, sending up a mushroom cloud that billowed at least 1,000 feet into the air.

The origin of the explosion was not immediately clear, since there were no airplanes immediately overhead. However, U.S. planes had roared in the skies over the front lines north of the capital throughout the morning and early afternoon Tuesday.

It was also not clear what positions had been hit by the blast and how extensive the damage was.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-206 next last
To: gaspar
You are right. The bomb was designed to create an intense horizontal over-pressure and shock wave to clear vegetation (along with other desireable collateral damage). Bomb was intended to explode just above ground, as you suggest.

A crater makes a lousy helipad, and a 15,000 lb. bomb can make a HUGE crater if it penetrates and then explodes.

Bear in mind this report was about a 1000' foot cloud. there was no indication in the report of secondary explosions. There was no report, that I read of an intense fireball (as would be with an FAE, which ALSO explodes above ground). This reporter has probably never seen a 2000 pounder go off before.

JDAMS in the morning are a beautiful thing.

121 posted on 10/30/2001 5:18:58 AM PST by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Movemout
I hadn't heard anybody mention Davy Crockett since the early 70s when they were abandoned, allegedly for being as dangerous to our guys as the enemy

That was in the early days of planning for the new army, the one they are designing for running around in modestly armored cars waging war in urban areas on citizens throwing rocks ala Palestine.

122 posted on 10/30/2001 5:22:43 AM PST by Elihu Burritt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Two Thirds Vote Aye
'No, as I understand it, an FAE explodes on or above ground. The shell is not really designed to penetrate. It basically explodes into a gas vapor cloud and then the gas vapor cloud is ignited by some ignition device after the cloud has had time to expand sufficiently. The burning fuel in the cloud demands oxygen and creates a vacuum for some radius around the burning cloud. So, it not only causes a horrendous fire, it also consumes all the oxygen in the near vicinity."

Kind of like a fully-fueled commercial airliner impacting a tall building???

Those 'high-tech bullies' of the Al-Queda used the Volkswagon version of the FAE. "Drivers wanted"

123 posted on 10/30/2001 5:27:31 AM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
My guess would be a fuel air bomb, which can flatten a 10 sq. km. area. It could have been dropped from way up so the airplane was not noticeable.
124 posted on 10/30/2001 5:32:11 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Good, I'm all for some serious, smart, nasty retribution and total annihilation of the enemy.
125 posted on 10/30/2001 5:37:06 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Just a slight correction. FAE's are not explosives but incendiaries. The results are nasty and very lethal but they do not act like explosives.

Mike

126 posted on 10/30/2001 5:39:38 AM PST by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
My guess would be a fuel air bomb, which can flatten a 10 sq. km. area. It could have been dropped from way up so the airplane was not noticeable.

Safest place to be when one of these babies goes off....

Anywhere you can say, "What the f was that?"

127 posted on 10/30/2001 5:48:13 AM PST by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
A fuel air explosion results when a dispersed mixture of fuel and dissolved, or finely dispered high explosive is detonated. It's a big blast. It's more economical than using all HE(high explosive).

Fuel air should be the weapon of choice in this war. Tit for tat.

128 posted on 10/30/2001 5:50:56 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Take the thousand feet estimate worth a grain of salt. The article says "at least 1000 feet." Very difficult to judge height from a distance, esp. when you don't know the distance and have no other reference points. Could have been lower. Might have been much, much higher. Some people don't even have a clue what a thousand feet is in the abstract. It's roughly equal to three football fields, with end zones, stacked end-to-end. Quite a few golfers can drive a golf ball more than a thousand feet.
129 posted on 10/30/2001 5:59:15 AM PST by Atticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abwehr; OLDWORD
As usual, the reporter on the article had not done his homework. The BLU-82, as I've said many times on FR, is a 15,000-pound Fuel Air bomb that drops on a parachute. It is a "retarded" bomb, because it MUST go off AFTER the plane that dropped it has gotten away. Otherwise it will blow the tail off the plane.

It runs the air pressure at ground zero up to 1,000 pounds per square inch, killing every living creature for about a square mile. But 30 minutes later, the area is safe for invading troops. In short, it is the perfect weapon against deployed troops.

If the reporter bothered to look up the informaton that is available readily on FR, he would have known that this was the BLU-82, being used for the second time (there were "demonstrations" in the Gulf War), and for the first time against troops.

The virgin supply in heaven just went way, WAY down.

The (More er Less) Honorable Billybob,
cyberCongressman from Western Carolina

Click here and go to "ALCU Watch" for "The Law of War," a detailed legal discussion of how the US declares war, both historically and in this instance.

For a clear discussion of the difference between what the US can constitutionally do in wartime with aliens (but NOT with US citizens of foreign extraction), see my book, Manzanar, published in 1988.

130 posted on 10/30/2001 5:59:38 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Was this nice explosion anywhere near where the 10,000 zealot/fanatics recently crossed the border to fight to the death?

If so, it was nice of them to make a target worth hitting and to go to Allah so quickly!

Attention to the next group of zealot/fanatic goat thumpers! You can start gathering on the border. Our special forces teams will usher you to your final seating arrangements! Leave your goats at home! We don't want your Peta buddies to have a bad day!

131 posted on 10/30/2001 6:20:07 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Was this the Daisy-Cutter used in Viet Nam? I thought the bomb they used there fell by parachute and had a long probe that allowed for an airburst when the probe made contact with the ground.

The one that I saw used in 1971, Central Highlands, VN, was as you described. I was on a very small FSB, near Charlie Ridge, called "Linda" or hill 270. There was an abandoned FSB on hill 327, several Klics away, which still had old culvert halves and other miscellaneous stuff that was left behind. It was used as an OP, due to height and location, by the NVA. I often called in fire missions, both day and night unexpectedly, to drop 10-15 rounds (105 or 155 mm) on hill 327 as surprises for Charlie. The Army decided to drop a blockbuster and remove all easy hiding places on 327. I was basically an FO on hill 270 and was told to observe from the 30' tower, where I worked while on duty. Everyone on 270 was ordered to stay inside their bunker/one-man hootch or wear flak vest and steel pots, if outside, at the appointed hour/minute. Using 20x, large field of view, binocs that were part of the I.O.S. instrument, I watched as the blockbuster was dragged out of a high altitude cargo plane by a parachute, and dropped at a high rate of descent, even with the small chute. There was a 10-20 foot pole on the bomb nose, for above ground detonation. Even though we were far enough away, the same relative altitude of the blast as our hill made the shockwave a minor danger but a major bone rattling, deep penetrating, thud. I can only imagine the effects of the same shockwave, at a closer range. Needless to say, the top of hill 327 looked nice and clean, like freshly plowed dirt, after the blast.

BTW .. that was the same hill 327 that the Marine sniper, Gunny Carlos Hathcock, used as a home base for a while, in the late 60s.

132 posted on 10/30/2001 6:25:13 AM PST by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: d14truth
Kind of like a fully-fueled commercial airliner impacting a tall building???
Those 'high-tech bullies' of the Al-Queda used the Volkswagon version of the FAE. "Drivers wanted"

Right you are!

133 posted on 10/30/2001 6:27:00 AM PST by Two Thirds Vote Aye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: sonofliberty2
What do you think it was? Ammo-dump, fuel air explosive, or micronuke?
134 posted on 10/30/2001 6:30:56 AM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dglang
"...If it was a nuke, there would be no one nearby able to ask what it was..."Funny how we have lots of pictures of nuclear explosions going off...
Gee, wonder who took those photos?
135 posted on 10/30/2001 6:31:00 AM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226
A distinguishing feature of FAE is that the dispersed cloud detonates. The tendency to detonate instead of burn is what makes it an explosive. Detonation means that once it's ignited there is no progressive flame front from the ignition source; the reaction goes from everywhere and anywhere in the mix all at once.

A familiar example is a gasline engine that burns fuel/air. If the ignition is advanced, the mix too lean, or the octane's too low the mix will knock(detonate), because the pressure is high enough. The fuel/air instead of burning with a smooth flame front and providing an even push on the piston, explodes and bangs the piston really hard. The engine doesn't transfer any of the power to the wheels, because all the energy goes into wrecking the metal parts in the engine.

If the mix in the FAE bomb is ignited before it's dipersed, it will just burn like napalm, or a flung bucket of burning fuel. If it's allowed to mix with air beyond it's explosive limit, it will detonate. That's what generates the overpressures. One of the key ingredients in FAEs is cyclonite, it's in there by design to insure an explosive mix.

Incendiaries are used to start fires. With FAEs, there's a big fire, but the mix consumes all the oxygen in the area. For that reason it wouldn't be used to deliberately start a fire, because the things one wants to set fire to won't burn very well w/o the oxygen. Incendiaries other than napalm types usually contain powdered metal or phosphorus. Those additives raise the temp. quite high and spread burning pieces all around.

136 posted on 10/30/2001 6:38:00 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
how sweet it is bump..
137 posted on 10/30/2001 6:45:56 AM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Movemout; patriciaruth
The main destructive force of FAE is high overpressure, useful against soft targets such as minefields, armored vehicles, aircraft parked in the open, and bunkers.

I had never heard of a FAE before, but this news is likely to have me grinning like a fool all day!

138 posted on 10/30/2001 6:49:24 AM PST by mtngrl@vrwc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: edskid
"huge.... size is relevant.

I saw the cloud on Fox ... Big but notb really a mushroom.

139 posted on 10/30/2001 6:51:40 AM PST by blackbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Yobe svoyu - Deshevle budet! ;-)
140 posted on 10/30/2001 6:52:06 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson